Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.00s

  • Funston v. District School Board, Etc.

    130 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1929

    Such programs are instituted by the board, and it would be an anomaly for them to sit as judges upon the merits of causes of dismissal which they created. The case of Venable v. … Board of Police Commrs., supra, decided by this court, is an authority against plaintiff’s contentions. From Kenny v. Kane, 27 Misc. Rep. 680 ( 59 N. Y.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Mueller v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    325 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1997

    The order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Board for reconsideration. … Petitioner’s diagnosis does not include any V Codes. The other two axes are Axis IV, Severity of Psychosocial Stressors, and Axis V, Highest Level of Adaptive Functioning Past Year.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hanson v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    331 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2001

    Id. at 150 ; see also Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151 , 934 P2d 399 (1997) (same result in similar circumstances). … See generally Mueller v.

    Reversed — as noted by 2 later courtsCited 10 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. Weintraub, Genshlea, Hardy, Erich & Brown

    844 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1994

    Hirsch v. Blue Cross, Blue Shield of Kansas City, 800 F.2d 1474, 1477 (9th Cir.1986). … In State ex rel Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners

    50 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 9, 1981

    Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, supra, 288 Or at 304-305 . … Assn. v.

    Modified by Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners, 51 Or. App. 773 (1981)Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Esperum v. Oregon Board of Parole

    296 Or. 789 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984

    Hein v. Board of Parole, 56 Or App 293 , 641 P2d 642 (1982). In Hein , the court stated: “The Board contends that such a holding would ‘nullify’ our decision in Cruz v. … review. 3 Matteson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Board of Parole

    190 Or. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2003

    We deny the board’s motion to dismiss. … Within 30 days of being served with petitioner’s petition for judicial review, the board must serve petitioner with a copy of the record. ORS 144.335(5).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    235 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2010

    We understand petitioner’s argument to oppose the board’s interpretation and application of the rule in denying his request to redeposit funds into his variable account. In Jordan v. … See Robison Jewish Home v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County

    Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2017

    Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County, 277 Or App 651, 372 P3d 587 (2016). … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185, 192, 935 P2d 411 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    338 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

    SHAKEYA ANITA MARIE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 22CR58470; A183060 Jodie A. Bureta, Judge. Submitted January 10, 2025. Ernest G. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Campbell v. Board of Medical Examiners

    16 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1974

    Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 (1951), 200 Or 488 , 258 P2d 124 (1953), appeal dis *387 missed 346 US 919 (1954); Board of Medical Examiners v. … As in Board of Medical Exammers v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Esperum v. Oregon Board of Parole

    297 Or. 222 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1984

    *226 MEMORANDUM OPINION A review of the Board of Parole orders setting initial release dates pursuant to ORS 144.120(1) reveals that, in the case of petitioner Borders, the Chairman of the Board was not present at the original … However, the chairman concurred in the action of three of the members of the Board on March 18, 1983, to override the minimum sentence imposed by the trial court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dawson/Fletcher v. Board of Parole

    346 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2009

    See Esperum v. Board of Parole, 296 Or 789, 796 , 681 P2d 1128 (1984) (so stating); Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 696 , 159 P3d 1151 (2007) (reaffirming that holding of Esperum). … E.g., Burden v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sommers v. Board of Parole

    69 Or. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 1984

    PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review, pursuant to ORS 144.335, of a final order of the Oregon State Board of Parole setting her parole release date. We remand for reconsideration. … She contends that the Parole Board abused its discretion in setting her release date at June, 1992, following ten years of incarceration. Without more, we would affirm. However, after the briefs were submitted, State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    338 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

    SHAKEYA ANITA MARIE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 22CR58470; A183060 Jodie A. Bureta, Judge. Submitted January 10, 2025. Ernest G. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Cardwell v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    38 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1979

    Petitioner appeals from an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board ("PSRB” or "the Board”) revoking his conditional release and ordering him committed to the Oregon State Hospital. … There is ample evidence in the record from which the Board could make such a finding. The Board, however, did not do so.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. McCoy

    193 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1951

    In Miller v. … See State v. Sunbeam Rebekah Lodge, 169 Or. 253 , 127 P. 2d 726 . Reversed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barmore v. State Board Medical Examiners

    21 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1891

    (Gerrish v. Gerrish, 8 Or. 351 ; 34 Am. Rep. 585 ; McIntyre v. Kamm, 12 Or. 253 ; Trabant v. Rummell, 14 Or. 17 ; Crawford v. Roberts, 8 Or. 324 .) … The same question was again before the supreme court in Board of Dental Examiners v. People, 123 Ill. 227 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board

    35 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 1978

    The Board and Drs. … Bacon v. Harris et al, 221 Or 553, 557 , 352 P2d 472 (1960). Under the Act, the Board is liable for certain of its torts for claims arising after July 1, 1968.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders Board

    19 Or. App. 794 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 1974

    State Highway Com. v. Rawson, 210 Or 593 , 312 P2d 849 (1957); Banif Corporation v. Black, 12 Or App 385 , 507 P2d 49 (1973). … Whitney v. Morgan, 9 Or App 289 , 497 P2d 865 (1972); Thomas v. SAIF, 8 Or App 414 , 495 P2d 46 (1972). Such is the case here.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.