The opinion
246 February 26, 2025 No. 155
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
SHAKEYA ANITA MARIE BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
22CR58470; A183060
Jodie A. Bureta, Judge.
Submitted January 10, 2025.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Carla E. Edmondson, Deputy Public Defender,
Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for
appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
EGAN, J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 338 Or App 246 (2025) 247
EGAN, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction entered
after a conditional plea of guilty to one count of fleeing or
attempting to elude a police officer, ORS 811.540. Her
appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90
and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The
brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We
affirm.1
The state charged defendant with fleeing or attempt-
ing to elude a police officer because she drove away after a
traffic stop. Defendant moved to suppress evidence of her
“conduct in response to an unlawful seizure and extension
of a traffic stop.” The trial court denied the motion determin-
ing that a trooper had probable cause to stop defendant, and
that the trooper’s conduct during the stop was subjectively
and objectively reasonable. Defendant entered a conditional
plea of guilty, and the trial court sentenced defendant to a
stipulated sentence of 18 months of bench probation.
Having reviewed the record, including the trial
court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour
brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed
authority to review, see ORS 138.105(9), we have identified
no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
1
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding
matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).