Case law

Brown v. Woodworth

5 Barb. 550 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1849

. & V. ed. 1789.). … In Monk v. Buller, (Cro. Jac. 574,) it was held that a license by a commoner must be by deed. (2 Saund. 323, 328.) Many cases will be found considered in Hawkins v. Shippam, (5 B. & C. 221;) Perry v.

People v. Brown

2018 NY Slip Op 3109 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2018

People v Brown ( 2018 NY Slip Op 03109 ) People v Brown 2018 NY Slip Op 03109 Decided on May 1, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on May 1, 2018 Renwick, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Webber, Kahn, JJ. 6421 4824/14 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryant Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Seymour W.

Brown v. Coughlin

165 A.D.2d 935 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1990

We have previously suggested that a deficiency in employee assistance is one which can be corrected during the hearing if the inmate makes a timely complaint (see, Matter of Reveron v Coughlin, 142 AD2d 860, 861 ). … Petitioner’s refusal to select an employee assistant from the list provided him during the adjournment precludes his claim that he was denied the right to employee assistance (see, Matter of Bates v Kelly, 152 AD2d 1009 )

People v. Brown

306 A.D.2d 12 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 2003

The court properly concluded, from the totality of the circumstances, that there was an independent source for the victim’s identification of defendant (see Manson v Brathwaite, 432 US 98 [1977]; People v Brown, 34 NY2d 879 … Illinois, 484 US 400, 414-415 [1988]; Williams v Florida, 399 US 78, 81-82 [1970]; People v Walker, 294 AD2d at 219 ).

People v. Brown

99 N.Y.2d 488 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2003

To support his argument, he points to our observation in People v Collins ( 82 NY2d 177 [1993]) that the exclusion for pretrial motions under CPL 30.30 (4) (a) “generally refers to delays attributable to responding to and … Specifically, defendant contends that the People were not entitled to the charge because it was never shown that his half brother was in his “control” (see People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428-429 [1986]).

People v. Brown

16 A.D.3d 430 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 7, 2005

Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281 [1992]; People v Rice, 285 AD2d 617 [2001]; People v Horn, 7 AD3d 638 [2004]; People v Weiss, 122 AD2d 180 [1986]). … Renna, 13 AD3d 398 [2004]; People v Regan, 11 AD3d 640 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 747 [2004]; People v Rice, supra; People v Horn, supra; see also Long v Donnelly, 335 F Supp 2d 450, 465-466 [2004]; McKenzie v Poole, 2004 WL

People v. Brown

169 A.D.2d 934 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1991

denied 69 NY2d 827 ; People v Shea, 54 AD2d 722 ). … Jones, 47 NY2d 409, 414-415 , cert denied 444 US 946 ; People v Hinton, supra; People v Santos, 154 AD2d 284, 285 , lv denied 75 NY2d 817 ).

Donohue v. Brown

3 Misc. 2d 969 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1956

Anow v. Hunt, 259 App. Div. 1071 ; Matter of Hines v. State Board of Parole, 181 Misc. 274 .)

People v. Brown

160 A.D.2d 1039 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1990

As the extensive plea colloquy attests, the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered into with the advice of counsel (see, People v George, 137 AD2d 876 ). … Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1,11 , supra; People v Bauer, 153 AD2d 988 ; People v Maye, 143 AD2d 483, 484 ).

Curtis v. Brown

2 Barb. 51 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1847

In Prosser v. … In Hough v.

People v. Brown

25 N.Y.3d 1174 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2015

Brown v. George

138 A.D.3d 466 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 7, 2016

The testimony *467 “established] that there was no dangerous condition on the premises which caused the accident, but rather that it was caused by the manner in which” plaintiff performed his work (Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d … The conclusory allegation in plaintiff’s bill of particulars, that defendant created or had notice of a defective condition on the exterior of the house, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (compare Sanchez v

People v. Brown

104 A.D.2d 696 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1984

opening statement, the prosecutor should “set forth the nature of the charge against the accused and state briefly the facts he expects to prove, along with the evidence he plans to introduce in support of the same” (People v … not rest on the belief of the police officer, but on the objective belief of defendant: “The test is * * * what a reasonable man, innocent of any crime, would have thought had he been in the defendant’s position” (People v

Brown v. . Guthrie

110 N.Y. 435 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1888

In form it was an absolute sale upon a chattel mortgage given for a fixed and agreed consideration; and while, nevertheless, such a sale, in spite of its form, may be proved to be an assignment in trust (Britton v. … (Brackett v. Harvey, 91 N. Y. 214 .) We see no- just reason why this creditor who defends should lose the preference which he obtained.

People v. Brown

135 A.D.3d 495 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 12, 2016

The challenged portions of the prosecutor’s summation were generally responsive to defense arguments, and there was nothing so egregious as to warrant reversal (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1st Dept 1997], lv denied … 91 NY2d 976 [1998]; People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1st Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]).

People v. Brown

2026 NY Slip Op 01628 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2026

People v Brown ( 2026 NY Slip Op 01628 ) People v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 01628 Decided on March 20, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … ANDRELLO BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Brown v. . Elwell

60 N.Y. 249 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1875

It establishes a "Board of Commissioners of Pilots," with authority to license pilots for that port, under the restriction that no license shall be granted to any person holding any license or authority from any other State … licensed or authorized by the laws of either, and that part of the thirty-ninth section of our statute, which makes it the duty of a master to take a licensed pilot — meaning, as we construe it, a pilot appointed by the board

Brown v. Andrews

1 Barb. 227 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1847

Lustig v. Brown

2026 NY Slip Op 02641 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2026

Lustig v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 02641 April 29, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Judy Lustig, appellant, v Volvie Brown, defendant, Lucy M. Mark, et al., respondents.

Brown v. Brown

64 A.D. 544 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1901

Thus, in Cook v. … (Finch v. Carpenter, 29 Hun, 268 .)