Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersLA

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Central La. Elec. Co. v. La. Public Service

    373 So. 2d 123 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 18, 1979

    Clearly, as mentioned above, the Commission has the power to disallow any unreasonable or unjust operating expense paid by a parent utility in fixing rates. La.R.S. 45:1176. … However, all of the cases cited by the Commission involve telephone companies and are clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Shaheen v. Khan

    13 La.App. 5 Cir. 998 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 21, 2014

    the trial court; and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). … The appellee first objects to the admission of the translation of the marriage contract as inadmissible hearsay, as the expert/translator provided only an attached affidavit and did not qualify as required under La.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mejia v. Lafayette Consolidated Government

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 3, 2024

    Kelly also asserts qualified immunity “[t]o the extent Plaintiffs intended to also assert § 1983 claims against [Kelly] in his individual capacity;” (Id. at p. 3) however, as Kelly is named only in his official capacity … , the Court need not address the issue of qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. George

    855 So. 2d 861 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 2003

    Aggravated kidnaping is the doing of any of the following acts with the intent thereby to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value, or to grant any advantage or immunity … Clearly these events constituted one continuing transaction.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Olds v. Ashley

    250 La. 935 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 5, 1967

    Tucker, a qualified surgeon practicing in Shreveport. … that the trial judge clearly abused the discretion vested in him by granting her the nominal sum of $250 as compensatory damages for her injuries.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Inzinna v. Guitreau

    272 So. 3d 582 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 2019

    Guitreau was acting with reckless disregard for the safety of others and thus not entitled to immunity under La. R.S. 32:24. … Second, this court must determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). Id. This test requires this court to review the record in its entirety to determine manifest error.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rebouche v. Anderson

    505 So. 2d 808 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1987

    The trial court found that she did not and that finding is entitled to great weight and is not to be overturned unless shown to be clearly wrong. … Finally, the court reasoned that if litigants were afforded an adequate supply of highly qualified polygraph experts, extensive procedural safeguards should be established, either by court rule or legislation, before the

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. James

    189 So. 2d 430 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1966

    Appellant, Whitney-Holding, is a Louisiana business corporation which owns all the stock in Whitney-New Orleans, excepting director's qualifying shares. … with the approval of the Comptroller of the Currency, establish and operate new branches: (1) Within the limits of the city, town or village in which said association is situated, if such establishment and operation are

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Council for the Advancement of Social Services and Education d/b/a CASSE Community Health Institute

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 5, 2026

    Chumley’s comment, the third element of the retaliation claim is clearly met. Therefore, the EEOC has established a prima facie case for the retaliation claim. … Therefore, the EEOC has established that Johnson was qualified.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Munaires

    12 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 12, 1935

    From the language of the exemption in the bill of lading above quoted the shipowner is clearly not liable for any fire occurring without the owner's personal design or neglect, and consequently fully relieves the respondents … In a case such as this where the fire starts on a pier and is communicated to cargo on a ship, the Fire Statute is applicable and, accordingly, the respondents are entitled to complete immunity. Providence & N. Y. S. S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    957 So. 2d 833 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 2007

    In Batson , the Court established a three part inquiry for the courts to make in determining whether the prosecution engaged in purposeful discrimination in the exercise of its peremptory challenges in jury selection. … A reviewing court owes great deference to the trial judge's evaluations of discriminatory intent and should not reverse them unless they are clearly erroneous. State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Estate of Rice v. Deville

    240 So. 2d 379 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1970

    Rice died, but before plaintiff was formally appointed and qualified as executrix of her estate. … This article accomplishes this result, and the language employed is emphatic enough to indicate clearly the legislative intent to overrule all cases to the contrary.” In Simpson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Magee v. Coats

    598 So. 2d 531 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1992

    He was qualified as an expert in accident investigation and accident reconstruction. … Plaintiffs assert that this finding is inconsistent with the jury's finding that Coats was at fault, because once it was established that he was speeding, the role of speeding in causation was also established; causation,

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Leitz v. Rosenthal

    166 So. 651 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1936

    The speed limit as established by the municipal ordinance was 30 miles per hour. According to the testimony of Dr. … A number of witnesses were presented by defendant; four in all qualified as expert automobile mechanics, each of whom testified that there was little or nothing that one could do to control the movement of an automobile which

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bullock v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

    429 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Mar 30, 1977

    Oral reasons were assigned at that time, and we here reiterate that although we felt that plaintiff established a prima facie case, it was not established by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff’s firing was based … This is clearly an inappropriate factor under the law. Brennan v. Prince William Hospital Corp., 503 F.2d 282 (4th Cir. 1974); Hodgson v. Brookhaven General Hospital, 436 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1970).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin

    837 So. 2d 1207 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 28, 2003

    Proc. art. 641 establishes two sets of circumstance under which a third-party may be considered a party needed for just adjudication. … Moreover, the Connells clearly do not qualify as a party needed for just adjudication under La.Code of Civ.

    Cited 261 timesPublished
  • Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.

    992 So. 2d 465 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2007

    The factfinder's factual determinations may not be disturbed on appeal unless they are clearly wrong. … clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Inzinna v. Guitreau

    272 So. 3d 582 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 2019

    Guitreau was acting with reckless disregard for the safety of others and thus not entitled to immunity under La. R.S. 32:24. … Second, this court must determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). Id. This test requires this court to review the record in its entirety to determine manifest error.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Manning

    885 So. 2d 1044 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 19, 2004

    The trial court erred when it qualified a State witness with limited experience as an expert in blood spatter analysis. … Paul Ware, who qualified without objection as an expert in forensic psychiatry.

    Cited 153 timesPublished
  • State v. Lewis

    125 So. 3d 482 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2013

    When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and inferred from the circumstances established by the evidence must be sufficient for a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable … Where the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence | ^imposed, remand is unnecessary even where there has not been full compliance with La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1. State v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.