Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.73s
585 A.2d 771 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1991
Bar Counsel points out that a three year statute of limitations would have applied to Holley v. … The Board, however, recommends that these two charges be dismissed due to a lack of clear and convincing proof. We agree with the Board’s recommendation as to these two charges.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMcGettigan v. National Bank of Washington
320 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1963
Finally it is not contended that defendants had attempted either to remove the trash or to board up the premises. … See, e. g., Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. (60 Mass.) 292 (1850) ; 8 Holdsworth, History of English Law, 446-59 (1937). .
Cited 23 timesPublished179 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1950
Co. v. City of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 1933, 64 F.2d 921, 929 , certiorari denied 1933, 290 U.S. 668 , 54 S.Ct. 88 , 78 L.Ed. 577 ; Southwestern Oil Co. v. … Case v.
Cited 18 timesPublished379 A.2d 713 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977
Spence v. Spence, D.C. App., 266 A.2d 29 (1970). … Compare, e.g., Brown v.
Cited 8 timesPublished534 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1976
See Cooper v. Lockhart, 489 F.2d 308, 314-15 (8th Cir. 1973); Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270, 272 (D.D.C.1973). See also, Lawrence v. … Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 (1965). . Tippitt v. Wood, supra, 140 F.2d at 692 ; Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, supra, 345 F.2d at 739 . .
Vacated on other grounds by Reed v. Byrd, 429 U.S. 995 (1976)Cited 11 timesPublished204 A.2d 341 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1964
Pettas v. United States, D.C.App., 203 A.2d 170, 172 (1964); Teresi v. United States, D.C.App., 187 A.2d 492, 493 (1963). … The suspect had been described as a “brown-skinned” colored man, 5' 7” or 5' 8” tall, 150 pounds, “very neatly” dressed, wearing a gray or black topcoat and a brown or gray hat.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCenturyTel of Montana, Inc. v. NLRB
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 2026
Cir. 2024) (quoting Dickinson v. … (quoting Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB, 440 U.S. 301, 314 (1979)).
Cited 0 timesPublished461 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2006
Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 ; Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc., 216 F.3d 1111, 1113 (D.C.Cir.2000); Harris v. … See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 . II. DISCUSSION A.
Cited 189 timesPublishedWilkes County, Ga. v. United States
450 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 1978
United States v. Board of Commissioners of Sheffield, Alabama, 435 U.S. 110 , 98 S.Ct. 965 , 55 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978); United States v. Georgia, 411 U.S. 526 , 528 n. 1, 93 S.Ct. 1702 , 36 L.Ed.2d 472 (1973). 4. … Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 569 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); Perkins v. Matthews, 400 U.S. 379, 390, 394 , 91 S.Ct. 431 , 27 L.Ed.2d 476 (1971); United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished979 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009
Henson v. … Huber v.
Cited 30 timesPublished513 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986
See Caravel Office Building Co. v. Peruvian Air Attache, 347 A.2d 280, 283 (D.C.1976); see also Briggs v. Goodwin, 186 U.S. … See Board Rule 7.2, note 11 supra.
Cited 2 timesPublished746 F. Supp. 1113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 1990
Knight v. … Brown, 365 A.2d 381, 384 (D.C.App.1976). Plaintiffs cannot be faulted for settling.
Cited 2 timesPublished141 A.2d 190 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1958
to interpretation by a member of the board. … Shade v. Colgate, 4 N.J.Super. 356 , 67 A.2d 193, 195 , appeal dismissed 3 N.J. 91 , 69 A.2d 19 .
Cited 1 timesPublished442 F.2d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971
The Board’s decisions are subject to review in the District Court. McCloskey v. Scrivener, 238 F.Supp. 497 (D.D.C.1965). … Connor v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedD&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
961 F.3d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2020
Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for 4 W. Dist. of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 60 (2013). … See Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd., 494 F.3d 378, 386 (2d Cir. 2007).
Cited 9 timesPublished483 F.2d 1284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1973
NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. TRANSWORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Lynn M. Tschirhart et al., Intervenors. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS INC., Petitioner, v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108
278 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1960
National Labor Relations Board v. … to the union); National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOrtiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
867 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 2016
Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). The district court granted summary judgment to the Department on the ground that Ortiz-Diaz failed to show that he suffered an adverse employment action. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ; see also Stewart, 352 F.3d at 426 .
Cited 33 timesPublishedFarris v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2021
(citing Johnson-El v. District of Columbia, 579 A.2d 163, 170 (D.C. 1990))). 7 Aziken v. District of Columbia, 194 A.3d 31, 34 (D.C. 2018). 8 Id. 9 Brown v. … Brown, 853 A.2d at 736; see also Motley-Ivey v. District of Columbia, 923 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCracken v. State of Colorado
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2025
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). McCracken’s allegations are not simple, concise, or direct, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1); the paragraphs are not limited to a single set of circumstances, see Fed. … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499. McCracken’s Complaint falls squarely into that category.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna