Case law

Brown v. Brown

185 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 3, 1992

McClure, 176 AD2d 325, 326 ; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444 ; Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg, 127 AD2d 766 ; see also, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 ). … Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929 ; see also, Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611 ; Kilmer v Kilmer, 109 AD2d 1004 ; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 842, at 194).

Brown v. Brown

362 S.C. 85 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Dec 6, 2004

Brown (Mother) appeals the family court order awarding custody of the couples’ three children to George C. Brown (Father). We affirm. … .”); Bragg v.

Buncombe County Board of Health v. Brown

271 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

Reade, J., in Doyle v. … To the same effect is Condry v. Cheshire, 88 N.C. 375 . Smith, C.J., in Lyon [Lynn] v.

Brown v. Brown

18 Conn. 410 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 15, 1847

Snellgrove v. Bailey, 3 Atk. 214. Ward v. Turner, 2 Ves. 431. 441. This reasoning seems at best to be artificial. … Parish & al. v. Stone, 14 Pick. 198 . *417 Grover, admr. v. Grover, 24 Pick. 261 .

Board of Education of Ashland School District v. Chattin

376 S.W.2d 693 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Mar 13, 1964

Hoskins v. Keen, Ky., 350 S.W.2d 467, 469 (1961). … In Guthrie v.

Brown v. Brown

45 Mo. 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

Brown, under a purchase from the latter’s administrator in October, 1855, for the consideration of $2,025. … Ev., § 307; Adams on Eject., by Tillinghast, p. 248; Merchants’ Bank v. Harrison, 39 Mo. 433 .)

Brown v. . Brown

124 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1899

State v. Massey, 97 N. C., 465 . … In Reed v. Reed (Appellate Court of Indiana), 33 N. E.

Brown v. Brown

4 Ind. 627 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1853

See Loveland v. Jones, ante, p. 184. Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Brown v. California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2009

BACKGROUND Brown’s claims stem from our grant of Brown’s habeas petition in Brown v. Poole, 337 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2003). … Absolute Immunity For Parole Board Decisions By Parole Board Members [4] The district court properly granted summary judgment on Brown’s claims against the parole board members, as parole board members are entitled

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 45 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Munson v. Hallowell, 26 Tex., 486 ; Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex., 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex., 354 ; Bremond v. McLean, 45 Tex., 11 ; Alston v. Richardson, 51 Tex., 1 . … Henderson v. Pilgrim, 22 Tex., 471 ; Wade on the Law of Notice, sec. 34.

Brown v. . Brown

58 N.Y. 609 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1874

Brown v. Brown

132 Conn. App. 30 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Nov 8, 2011

Brown, and (2) making certain findings with respect to the parties’ eldest child. … Brown that is the problem.”

Brown v. Brown

392 S.C. 615 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Mar 30, 2011

Sheri Denise Brown (Wife) and Phillip Ray Brown (Husband) were divorced in 2006. … See Eaddy v.

Brown v. Brown

300 Ga. 559 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 23, 2017

Killingsworth v. Killingsworth, 286 Ga. 234 (3) ( 686 SE2d 640 ) (2009). … See also Pollard v. Pollard, 297 Ga. 21, 22 ( 771 SE2d 875 ) (2015) (“It is well settled that a court may not modify a divorce decree in a contempt order. . . .”).

Brown v. Brown

266 N.Y. 532 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1935

Brown v. Brown

86 Tenn. 277 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1888

Brown v. H. A. … In Wilkinson v.

Brown v. Vitelcom, Inc.

47 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Apr 26, 1999

s directors, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, also sat on Vitelcom's corporate board. … ATN Inc. and Vitelcom's corporate boards had two directors in common, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, who apparently owned 60% of both companies.

Brown v. Brown

12 A.D.3d 176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 2004

“Beneficiaries enjoy only expectancy interests and not vested legal rights” (Blackmon v Estate of Battcock, 78 NY2d 735, 739 [1991]). … Capital v Karp Family Assoc., 285 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]). In any event, the tort claims were merely duplicative of the insufficiently pleaded breach of contract causes of action herein.

Brown v. Brown

156 Tenn. 619 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1928

In Clark v. … Lyon v. Lyon, supra.

Brown v. Brown

28 Minn. 501 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Dec 23, 1881

In Norton v. … Shaubhut v. Hilton, 7 Minn. 412 , (506;) Keegan v. Peterson, 24 Minn. 1 . Judgment affirmed.