Case law

Brown v. Lutterlott

1 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1802

State v. Brown

311 N.C. 764 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1984

Shore v. Brown

323 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1988

State v. Brown

305 N.C. 761 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1982

Brown v. Candler

236 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1952

Kistler v. Board of Education, supra; Feezor v. Siceloff; 232 N.C. 563 , 61 S.E. 2d 714 ; Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661 , 58 S.E. 2d 725 ; Atkins v. McAden, supra; Messer *581 v. … Feezor v. Siceloff, supra,; Board of Education v. Lewis, supra; Atkins v. McAden, supra; Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N.C. 499 , 193 S.E. 732 .

Brown v. Scism

302 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1981

Brown v. Boney

298 N.C. 294 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1979

State v. Brown

292 N.C. 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

State v. Brown

286 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1975

Ayers v. Brown

287 N.C. 464 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

Perry v. Brown

17 S.C.L. 45 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1828

Powell v. Brown

17 S.C.L. 100 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1828

The case of Cooper v. … The same remark applies to the cases of Stockton v. Martin, 2 Bay, 471 , Tucker v. Stevens, 4 Desaus. 532 , and Milledge v.

State v. Brown

280 N.C. 723 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1972

State v. Brown

263 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

State v. Brown

251 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1959

Brown v. . Clegg

41 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1849

Brown», married soon after C-ariess took the slaves into possession.

Honeycutt v. . Brown

191 N.C. 829 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926

This is an action for actionable negligence, brought by plaintiff, Luther Honeycutt, against defendant, Jim Brown. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows: "1.

Green v. . Brown

64 N.C. 553 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

The words ‘‘good, bankable currency” must be interpreted according to the state of the facts and the popular understanding of these terms at the time the note was given Laws v. Rycroft, ante 100.

Whitsett v. . Brown

56 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

Thomas Brown died in 1855, leaving a last will and testament, which has been duly admitted to probate. … The execu- or of Thomas Brown has no right to intermeddle with it; nor *300 ‘Lave the other children any claim to it; but that is not the question here.

Brown v. . Fink

48 N.C. 378 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1856

In Hitchcock v. … Our attention was called to the case of Cox v. Parry, 1 T. R. 464. That was an action on a ~bond, and several breaches were assigned.