Opinion

State v. Brown

  • 263 N.C. 247
  • 139 S.E.2d 256
  • 1964 N.C. LEXIS 810
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Dec 16, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Cuelam
On the bench
Cuelam
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER Cuelam.

There was plenary evidence that defendant intentionally shot Blumell on December 6, 1963, between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m., on Roxboro Street (near its intersection with Canal Street) in Durham, North Carolina, and that Blumell died at Duke Hospital on December 7, 1963, at 12:45 a.m., as the result of bullet wound (s) so inflicted.

*248 Upon the evidence and instructions, whether defendant was guilty of murder in the second degree, or guilty of manslaughter, or not guilty, was submitted for jury determination. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict. A full and careful consideration of the record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. The court instructed the jury fully as to all legal principles and contentions favorable to defendant. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

Defendant, an indigent, was represented in the superior court by two court-appointed counsel. After trial and conviction, defendant requested that said counsel be discharged and that the court appoint other counsel to prosecute his appeal. Under these circumstances, the court permitted said court-appointed trial counsel to withdraw and appointed Marshall T. Spears, Jr., Esquire, as counsel for defendant to perfect and prosecute his appeal. Mr. Spears has served only as appellate counsel.

No error.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.