Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • State v. Brown

    297 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1984

    The next day, and again on April 8, the victim identified the defendant, Alvin Brown, as the perpetrator of the crimes by picking his photograph out of a photographic display. … .”); People v.

    Limited by Snow v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 308 Or. 259 (1989)Cited 244 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    310 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1990

    See also Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 704-05 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (same rule applies to exhibits). … Bates, do you know the Defendant in this case, Cornelius Brown? “A. Yes. “Q. How do you know Mr. Brown? “A. Well, I’ve met Mr.

    Cited 468 timesPublished
  • Hazell v. Brown

    352 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2012

    Hazell v. Brown, 238 Or App 487 , 242 P3d 743 (2010). For the reasons set out in this opinion, we also affirm the trial court’s judgment and the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals. … See Eacret v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    301 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1986

    State v. Brown, 72 Or App 342, 347 , 695 P2d 1383 (1985). The Court of Appeals rejected the idea, as it had in previous cases, State v. Martin, 71 Or App 1,6 , 691 P2d *273 154 (1984); State v. … As we said in State v. Greene, supra, and State v.

    Overruled by State v. McCarthy, 369 Or. 129 (2021)Cited 125 timesPublished
  • Richards v. Brown

    345 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025

    Affirmed. 322 Richards v. Brown EGAN, J. … No such exception exists for affirmative defenses. 328 Richards v. Brown prohibited special verdict.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    7 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

    (State of Oregon v. Dodson, 4 Or. 64 .) And we hold it to be good and sufficient in law. … (Shattuck v. Smith, 5 Or. 125 .)

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    263 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2014

    See State v. Noe, 242 Or App 530 , 256 P3d 166 (2011) (guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle merges with guilty verdict for unauthorized use of a vehicle); see also ORAP 5.45(1); Alies v. … We agree, accept the state’s concession, and, for the reasons stated in State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sievers v. Brown

    45 L.R.A. 642 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1899

    In Button v. … Stower, 9 Johns. 331 ; Dolittle v. Eddy, 7 Barb. 74 ; Whiteside v. Jackson, 1 Wend. 418 ; Leonard v. Pitney, 5 Wend. 30 ; Jackson v. Stewart, 6 Johns. 34 ( 8 Am. Dec. 293 ); Quackenboss v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    5 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

    .: The record shows that Brown, the respondent, was indicted in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Lane, on December 10, 1872, for the crime of larceny in a *120 shop.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hackney

    228 Or. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 2009

    See Hughes v. … .”); see generally Mendez v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nielsen v. Brown

    232 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1962

    This is a personal injury action based on charges of gross negligence in the operation of an automobile by the defendant Beverly Elizabeth Brown. … In Wilson v.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by State v. Foster, 296 Or. 174 (1983)Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    1 Or. App. 322 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 21, 1969

    State of Texas v. Gonzales, 388 F2d 145 (5th Cir 1968); United States v. Calabro, 276 F Supp 284 (SD NY 1967); Brock v. United States, 223 F2d 681 (5th Cir 1955). … Mosco v. United States, 301 F2d 180 (9th Cir), cert den 371 US 842 *328 (1962); Teasley v. United States, 292 F2d 460 (9th Cir 1961); Boim v. State, 194 So2d 313 (Fla 1967); Browne v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lord

    7 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

    This court held in the case of Odell v. … (Wi lmer v. Farris, 40 Iowa, 309 .)

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Northcutt

    14 Or. 529 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1887

    Brown.” The respondents and appellant were the principal owners of the wheat stored. … (See Cushing at al. v. Breed et al., 14 Allen, 380 ; 53 Iowa, 192 , 193 ; 3 Federal Reporter, 19 and 20; Dole et al. v. Olmstead et al., 36 Ill. 150 .) In Cushing v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    231 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1962

    State v. Henderson, 182 Or 147 , 184 P2d 392 . It is, of course, the general rule that in the trial of a criminal case, evidence that the defendant committed independent and unrelated crimes is inadmissible. State v. … State v. Dennis, 177 Or 73 , 159 P2d 838 , 161 P2d 670 ; State v. Sullivan, 139 Or 640 , 11 P2d 1054 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    28 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1895

    In State v. … In Kumli v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Knepper v. Brown

    345 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2008

    Knepper v. Brown, 182 Or App 597, 623 , 50 P3d 1209 (2002). On remand, the case proceeded to trial. … more likely if Brown, rather than a board-certified plastic surgeon, performed liposuction surgery.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    306 Or. 599 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1988

    State v. Brown, 90 Or App 445 , 752 P2d 1316 (1988). … See, e.g., Wagner v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    306 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 2020

    TYLER MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 18CR59273; A169722 473 P3d 1164 Sheryl Bachart, Judge. … The trial court denied the motion, relying on State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    305 Or. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 29, 2020

    Aoyagi, J., dissenting. 646 State v. Brown KISTLER, S. J. … See State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.