Opinion

State v. Brown

  • 263 Or. App. 751
  • 330 P.3d 1249
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 866
  • 2014 WL 2884444
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Jun 25, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Hadlock, Mooney, Sercombe, Tempore
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.4%

holding that a trial court’s failure to merge PSV and UUV verdicts was plain error, exercising discretion to review the error for the reasons stated in State v. Camacho-Alvarez, 225 Or App 215, 216-17, 200 P3d 613 (2009), and remanding for resentencing

How later courts described this case

  • holding that a trial court’s failure to merge PSV and UUV verdicts was plain error, exercising discretion to review the error for the reasons stated in State v. Camacho-Alvarez, 225 Or App 215, 216-17, 200 P3d 613 (2009), and remanding for resentencing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, possession of a stolen vehicle, ORS 819.300, and first-degree criminal trespass, ORS 164.255. On appeal he raises three assignments of error. We reject without discussion defendant’s first two assignments of error, in which he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal on the unauthorized use of a vehicle and possession of a stolen vehicle charges. In his third assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court committed plain error in failing to merge the guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle with the guilty verdict for unauthorized use of a vehicle. See State v. Noe, 242 Or App 530 , 256 P3d 166 (2011) (guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle merges with guilty verdict for unauthorized use of a vehicle); see also ORAP 5.45(1); Alies v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82 , 823 P2d 956 (1991) (court has discretion to review unpreserved error of law apparent on the face of the record). The state concedes that the trial court so erred. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and, for the reasons stated in State v. Camacho-Alvarez, 225 Or App 215, 216 , 200 P3d 613 (2009), conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error in this case.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge the guilty verdict for possession of a stolen vehicle and unauthorized use of a vehicle into a single conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.