Case law

Cooper v. AFSCME, LOCAL 1033

656 A.2d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1995

See Williams v. … Compare Newman v.

79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1018, 335 u.s.app.d.c. 179 Jessie Berger, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen, Local 201, Appellees/cross-Appellants. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Appellant/cross-Appellee

170 F.3d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1999

Brown. … Paul Brown, James Hicks, and James Brown.

Fregeau v. Mossinghoff

602 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1984

DeSeversky v. Brenner, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 370, 424 F.2d 857, 858 (1970). “Deference is owed to the findings of the Patent Office.” Puharich v. Brenner, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 402 , 415 F.2d 979, 982 (1969). … Puharich v. Brenner, supra, 134 U.S.App.D.C. at 402 , 415 F.2d at 982 .

In re Soto

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2023

Porter, Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, and Joseph C. Perry, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, were on the brief for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. … We accept the Board’s recommendation. “The Board’s recommended sanction ‘comes to us with a strong presumption in favor of its imposition.’”

In re Roy L. Person, Jr.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2020

Pearson v. … Because Pearson v.

Taylor v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2014

B°"k""pt€¥ Courts SAUNDRA TAYLoR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) l v ) civil A¢ci@n N@. f 4 -»QXQ_/ l VERIZoN COMMUNICATIoN, 1Nc., er al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMoRANDUM oPlNloN This matter is before the Court on consideration of … See, e.g_, Wrz`ght v, District of Columbia Dep ’t of E)np ’t Servs., 924 A.Zd 284 (D.C. 2007) (affirrning Compensation Review Board’s decision to vacate award by administrative law judge of workers’ compensation benefits

Myles James Swift v. Director of Selective Service

448 F.2d 1147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 1971

V, 1970) § 460(b) (3)). In our initial opinion in this case of March 16, 1971, we disagreed with that conclusion and held, Judge Wilkey dissenting, that under United States v. … United States v. Ritchey, 423 F.2d 685 (9th Cir. 1970) ; United States ex rel. Luster v. McBee, 422 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1970) ; accord, United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1970) ; contra, Liese v.

Timothy Jenkins v. Howard University

123 F.4th 1343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2024

Caterpillar Inc. v. … In fairness, the charter does vest the Board with governing authority and require the Board to enact lawful bylaws.

Michael Baxley v. Daniel Driscoll

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2026

Rodgers v. … R.Rs. v. ICC, 978 F.2d 737, 740 (D.C.

DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE v. Bebchick

706 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1998

Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978). See also W. Page Keeton et al., ProsseR and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 130 (5th ed.1984). … Federated Dep’t Stores v.

Bender v. Jordan

515 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2007

Doe v. Harris, 696 F.2d 109, 111 (D.C.Cir.1982) (citing County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 , 99 S.Ct. 1379 , 59 L.Ed.2d 642 (1979)). … Bender v. Jordan, 439 F.Supp.2d 139 (D.D.C.2006) [Dkt. #50], Earlier versions of the dispute are reflected in Bender v. Indep. Fed. Sav. Bank, No. 05-1787 (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2005); Indep. Fed. Sav. Bank v.

Daniels v. Wick

655 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 1985

See FEC v. … New England Coalition on Nuclear Poll. v. N.R. C., 727 F.2d 1127 (D.C.Cir.1984); Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 415 F.2d 922, 939-40 (D.C.

George v. Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

825 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1993

. § 411 (a)(2); see also International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 498 U.S. 466 , 111 S.Ct. 880 , 112 L.Ed.2d 991 (1991); Carothers v. Presser, 818 F.2d 926, 929 (D.C.Cir.1987). … See Bright v.

Wesby v. District of Columbia

765 F.3d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 2, 2014

BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The court today articulates a broad new rule — one that essentially removes most species of unlawful entry from the criminal code. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). The surrounding context may not convince a jury to find probable cause.

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Saturn Airways, Inc., Capitol Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Saturn Airways, Inc., Capitol Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Saturn Airways, Inc., Capitol Airways, Inc., Intervenors

348 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1965

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Saturn Airways, Inc., Capitol Airways, Inc., Intervenors. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. … Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v.

Georgia Department of Community Health v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

79 F. Supp. 3d 269 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2015

v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). … v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 160 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (citing Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 (1973)); Richards v.

Putman v. Dudas

539 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2008

See Monsanto Co. v. Kamp, 269 F.Supp. 818, 822 (D.D.C.1967). The “thrust” of the action “is that the decision of the board is erroneous on the facts, the law, or both.” Fregeau v. … Standard Havens v. Manbeck, 1994 U.S. Dist.

Robinson v. United States

355 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1976

Hence, the frisk was lawful under Sibron v. State of New York, supra; Terry v. Ohio, supra; and Adams v. Williams, supra. … Appellant is a Negro male and was wearing a red jacket and brown or reddish-brown pants. 3 .

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

310 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2004

See INS v. … Defendants’ Reliance on FDA v. Brown & Williamson Is Misplaced Defendants rely heavily on Brown & Williamson. In that case, the Supreme *74 Court held that the FDA lacks authority to regulate tobacco products.

Laccetti v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n

885 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2018

LACCETTI, PETITIONER v. … Conley, Solicitor, and Dominick V. Freda, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission.