Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.01s
69 Mo. App. 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1897
Brown and John M. Ayres, $400, which they promised to pay if a depot is established on the H. & C. M. railroad on the W. i of the S. … 1889, it is provided that “at all stations or depots where a telegraph office is Icept, the agent or telegraph operator at such station or depot shall, for the information.of the traveling public, indicate on such bulletin board
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Mo. App. 86 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1876
Peter Brown was convicted of the murder of Celia Brown-on April .16, 1875, in St. Louis county, at a place called Hog Hollow, in Bonhomme township. … The indictment is for the murder of Celia Brown. The confession is of "the murder of Cynthia Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Mo. 397 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1823
See Gov. of Missouri v. Rector, 1 Mo. R.,p. 638. Snell v. Owens, 3 “ “ 225. Posey v. Buckner, 3 " “ 605.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 Mo. 8 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1835
That court, on Kelsy’s motion, dismissed the cause for want of notice of the appeal from the justice; and to reverse the judgment of the circuit court Brown now prosecutes his appeal in this court. … See 23 of the “act to establish justices’ courts, passed 21st 1825f ’ ]\j0 COpy 0f the notice served on Kelsy seems to , 1 , , , , , , r, have been kept by the deiendant Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished66 Mo. App. 211 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1896
Loos has this second day of October, 1894, bargained, sold, conveyed and transferred, unto-Lucy Brown a certain stock of merchandise, consisting of a stock of drugs and jewelry, and in fact all the stock of goods contained
Cited 0 timesPublished315 Mo. 478 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1926
[See Brown v. Holman, 238 S. W. 1065 .] … In Adams v. Main, 3 Ind. App. 232 , 29 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished110 Mo. App. 424 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1905
Brown and E. R. … Ency. of Law (2 Ed.), pp. 698-9; Pollard v. Lumpkin, 6 Gratt. (Va.) 398; Aldrich v. Jessiman, 8 N. H. 516.] The judgment is affirmed. All concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna