Opinion

State v. Brown

  • 188 Mo. 400
  • 87 S.W. 1197
  • 1905 Mo. LEXIS 27
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
May 16, 1905
Status
Published
Author
Fox
On the bench
Burgess, Fox, Gantt
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FOX, J.

There was no bill of exceptions filed in this cause and the case is here by appeal upon the record proper.

The record discloses that on November 2,1903, the prosecuting attorney of Ripley county, Missouri, filed in the circuit court of said county an information charging the defendant with taking a female person, under the age of eighteen years, from her mother, who had legal charge of the person of- said female child, for the purpose of concubinage and cohabitation with him as man and wife, which acts are prohibited and denounced by section 1842, Revised Statutes 1899.

Defendant waived formal arraignment and entered his plea of not guilty. Upon a trial by a jury a verdict of guilty was returned and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. Judgment *401 and sentence was entered of record in accordance with the verdict, and from this judgment defendant appeals.

The proceedings during the progress of the trial .have not been preserved by the bill of exceptions and none is on file before us, and an examination of the record proper discloses substantial regularity; hence, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Gantt, J., concurs; Burgess, P. J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.