Case law

In Re Day

717 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1998

Bar Counsel agrees with the Board's recommendation. … See Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 378-79 , 91 S.Ct. 780 , 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971). However, it is well established that an individual can waive any process to which he or she has a right. See D.H. Overmyer Co. v.

United States v. Rapheal Earl Brown, Jr.

8 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1993

UNITED STATES of America v. Rapheal Earl BROWN, Jr., Appellant. No. 92-3216. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 27, 1993. Before: WALD, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges. … See United States v.

Davis v. District of Columbia

59 A.2d 208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1948

such board. … V, § 36 — 402 et seq.

Denver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

13 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1993

COOPER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 93-1442. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Dec. 6, 1993. … In Cooper v. Railroad Retirement Board, 977 F.2d 647 (D.C.Cir.1992), we held that petitioner was without fault in causing the overpayment.

In Re Campbell

522 A.2d 892 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1987

United States v. … Citing United States v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East)

380 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1967

this 7 E.g., United States v. … Trainmen v. Certain Carriers, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 232 , 349 F.2d 207 , 209 n. 7 (1965). 8 E.g., Bowman v. Curt G. Joa, Inc., 361 F.2d 706, 716 (4th Cir. 1966); Cranston Print Works Co. v.

In Re Baker

579 A.2d 676 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1990

.”); Roberts v. … District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 577 A.2d 319 (D.C.1990) (“although the Board’s requirement of a 75 passing grade may seem harsh when the applicant came close to that and was certified by another state, it is the Board

Ricciardi v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 2026

Ass’n v. … See Niblock v.

Rizzi v. Fanelli

63 A.2d 872 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1949

Dick v. Marx and Rawolle, Inc., 55 App.D.C. 267 , 4 F.2d 879 ; Board of Trustees, etc., v. O. D. Wilson Co., 77 U.S.App.D.C. 127 , 133 F.2d 399 ; Portland Hotel Corporation v. Fidelity Storage Corporation, 77 U.S.App. … See also Whiting v. Davidge, 23 App.D.C. 156 , and Stanton v. Haskins, 8 D.C. 558 , 1 MacArthur 558 , 29 Am.Rep. 612 . Neary v. Markham, 10 Cir., 155 E.2d 485; Ridge v. Healy, 8 Cir., 251 E. 798; Skeen v.

Junius Joyner, III v. Morrison and Foerster LLP

140 F.4th 523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2025

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting George v. … Brown, 774 F.3d at 1023.

Major Adolph H. Knehans, Jr. v. Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army

566 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1977

See, e. g., Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549, 551 (8th Cir. 1975); Sohm v. Fowler, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 365 F.2d 915 (1966); McCurdy v. … See, e. g., Hodges v.

In re Tsai

860 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2004

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that reciprocal and functionally identical discipline be imposed in the form of a public censure. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Tsai, 376 Md. 538 , 830 A.2d 910 (2003). 1 Respondent did not notify Bar Counsel of this Maryland order, as our rules require. See D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11(b).

Bender v. Jordan

570 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2008

See Bender v. … Bender sought to oust had already resigned from Board); Bender v. Jordan, 439 F.Supp.2d 139 (D.D.C.2006) (granting Mr.

In re Washington

513 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986

If no exceptions are timely filed, the parties waive their rights to briefing and oral argument, and the Board takes action based on the record. Board Rule 13.4. … See Caravel Office Building Co. v. Peruvian Air Attache, 347 A.2d 280, 283 (D.C.1976); see also Briggs v. Goodwin, 186 U.S.

Benvenuti v. Department of Defense

613 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1985

Benvenuti v. Department of Defense, 587 F.Supp. 348 (D.D.C.1984). The Board has completed its inquiry and presently before the Court is defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment. … The Committee for GI Rights v. Callaway, 518 F.2d 466, 474 (D.C.Cir.1975). The Board adopted the OTJAG conclusion. A.R. at 2, 7.

Atkins v. Naval Sea Systems Command

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2025

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., 789 F.3d 146, 150 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Elghannam v. Nat’l Ass’n of Bds. of Pharmacy, 151 F. Supp. 3d 57, 60 n.1 (D.D.C. 2015) (Cooper, J.) (citing Brown, 789 F.3d at 151).

Jones v. Wainwright

744 F. Supp. 2d 341 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 2010

At the outset, petitioner’s claims arising from the Parole Board’s actions are moot, see Franklin v. … Parole Board. See Sutherland v.

Daryl Becker v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, T and P Railway, Inc. And American Trails Association, Inc., Intervenors

132 F.3d 60 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 1997

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. … Nevertheless, the Board, relying on Birt v.

Pinkney v. District of Columbia

439 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1977

Healy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 284-286 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 574-575 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471, 482-83 (1977). … Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494, 544-551 , 97 S.Ct. 1932 , 1959 1961, 52 L.Ed. 531 , 565-568 (1977). 24 . Id. 25 . See Cleveland Board of Education v.

Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. M. F. A. Milling Company, Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. M. F. A. Milling Company v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1972

P 12,665 LOCAL UNION 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. M. F. A. MILLING COMPANY, Respondent, Local Union 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. M. F. A.