Case law

Unum Corp. v. United States

929 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, D. Maine · May 23, 1996

Co. v. United States, 594 F.2d 530, 534-35 (5th Cir.1979). … Co. v. United States, 594 F.2d 530, 532 (5th Cir.1979).

Beal v. Bryant

99 Me. 112 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1904

In Adasken v. … In Colton v.

SeniorsPlus v. Maine Department of Health and Human Services

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 23, 2017

V. … State v. Brown, 2014 ME 79, cir 14, 95 A.3d 82. However, the courts views claims of equitable estoppel against government agencies with caution. Mrs. T. v. Comm'r of the Dept.

Shattuck v. Potter

441 F. Supp. 2d 193 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 27, 2006

Navarro v. Pfizer Corp., 261 F.3d 90, 93-94 (1st Cir.2001) (quoting McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 56 F.3d 313, 315 (1st Cir.1995)). … Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). III.

York County Probate Court v. Atwood

Superior Court of Maine · May 10, 2005

ATWOOD and BOARD OF YORK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendants Tlys matter comes before the court only on count I of the substituted verified complaint. … York Register of Probate v. York County Probate Court, et al., 2004 ME 58, 19, 847 A.2d 395 (emphasis in the orignal).

Watkins v. J & S Oil Co., Inc.

977 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1997

Brown v. J.C. Penney Corp., 924 F.Supp. 1158, 1163 (SJD.Fla.1996); see 29 C.F.R. § 825.214 (a) (noting that an employee is entitled to reinstatement “even if the employee has been replaced”). … Id. at 893; see also Scheer v.

Lindsley v. Lindsley

374 A.2d 311 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1977

We find the purposes of § 61.14 not served by the across-the-board distinction here urged by Mr. Lindsley. … In Cordrey v.

Jipson v. S. Portland Hous. Auth.

Superior Court of Maine · May 5, 2008

Twigg v. Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (1996). Indeed, "a demonstration that no competent evidence supports the local board's findings is required in order to vacate the board's decision." … Comeau v.

Richard v. Reg'l Sch. Unit 57

296 F. Supp. 3d 274 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 7, 2017

Delgado Echevarria v. AstraZeneca Pharm. LP , 856 F.3d 119 , 133-34 (1st Cir. 2017) ; Kelley v. Corr. Med. … Abril-Rivera v. Johnson , 806 F.3d 599 , 609 (1st Cir. 2015) ; Sánchez-Rodriguez v.

State v. Hassett

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 23, 2016

United States v. Owens, 167 F.3d 739, 749 (1st Cir. 1999). … See, e.g., State v.

Jasper v. Austin

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 3, 2009

Nor is it clear from the pleadings what the issues were before the Board. … See Parrish v.

United States v. Reeks

441 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 7, 2006

See United States v. Hernandez, 234 F.3d 252, 256 (5th Cir.2000)(citing United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1217 (5th Cir.1991)); United States v. Sumlin, 317 F.3d 780, 782 (8th Cir.2003)(citing United States v. … United States v.

Smith v. Hines

119 Me. 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1920

Boldt v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 245 U. S. 441 , and cases cited. Monk v. Power Co. 112 Maine, 492. In Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co. v. De Atley, 241 U. … Co. v. Hall, 232 U. S. 94, 101 , Seaboard, Air Line v. Horton, 233 U. S. 492, 494 ; See Jacobs v. Southern Ry. Co., 241, U. S. 229; Dutrey v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co., Penn. Sup.

Ames v. Cohen

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 7, 2008

DISCUSSION Generally, equitable claims are tried to the court, not the jury. 1 Field, McKusick and Roth, Maine Civil Practice § 38.1 (2d ed. 1970), Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. … Jur. 2d Specific Performance § 1 et seq. (2001), Brown and Sons v. Boston and Maine Railroad, 106 Me. 248; 76 Me. 692 (1909); Sullivan v. Porter, 2004 ME 134; 861 A.2d 625.

THERRIEN v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 9, 2025

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Plaintiff has not alleged the existence of a policy or custom that would serve as a basis for the liability of Cumberland County. … Staples v. Gerry, 923 F.3d 7, 13 (1st Cir. 2019) (quoting Wright v. Goord, 554 F.3d 255, 268 (2d Cir. 2009)).

Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P. v. Harrington (In re Cushman)

589 B.R. 469 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Jun 29, 2018

See Hadges v. … Co. v.

Lincoln v. Stokes

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 8, 2005

Truman v. Browne, 2001 W E 182 ¶ 11,788 A.2d 168,171. … Dineen v. Dau~han,381 A.2d 663 (Me. 1978); Restatement, Second, Torts § 587.

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

157 Me. 187 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1961

V. Mentally ill individual. “Mentally ill individual” means an individual having a psychiatric or other disease which substantially impairs his mental health. … Stuart v. Smith, 101 Me. 397 . The writ of habeas corpus must remain available at all times to any person hospitalized under an Act such as L. D. 1496.

Susan R. Snow v. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A.

176 A.3d 729 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 2017

DiCentes v. … Peaslee v.

Pineo v. State

908 A.2d 632 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 23, 2006

In Strickland v. … In United States v.