Case law

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

3 F. Supp. 2d 1473 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1998

The motivation for this case is injuries suffered by plaintiff Betty Smith allegedly caused by her smoking cigarettes manufactured by defendants Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., R.J. … Bailey v. Greenberg, 516 A.2d 934, 941 (D.C.1986) (emphasis added); see also Hobson v.

Brown v. Bradley

6 App. D.C. 207 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1895

S. 544 ; Muller v. Ehlers, 91 U. S. 249 , and United States v. Breitling, 20 How. 253 , do not support the contention of the petitioners. … first and last of these cases the judgments were rendered at the same terms at which the trials were had; and no such question arose, or could arise, as *224 is here presented to us ; and in the other case, that of Muller v.

Brown v. Gottschalk

484 F.2d 813 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1973

This court in Comm'n of Patents v. … Schindler v. Comm'n of Patents, 269 F.Supp. 630 (D.C.D.C. 1967); Monsanto Co. v. Kamp, 269 F.Supp. 818 (D.C.D.C.1967).

Brown v. Macfarland

19 App. D.C. 525 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1902

These instances are referred to, in the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Bauman v. Ross, 167 U.

Brown v. U.S. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT LEE BROWN, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. ll-l758 (RJL) U.S. … See Sentence, Nov. 14, 2011, United States v. Brown, No. 201 1-CF3-740l (D.C. Super. Ct.); see also USPC Mot., Ex. 1 (Sentence Monitoring Computation Data as of 03-16~2012) at 1-2.

MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

115 A.3d 571 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2015

Id. at 842-43 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 ; Timus v. … See also Kingdomware Tech., Inc. v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2021

Brown v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d at 1073.

Brown v. Suter

298 F. App'x 15 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 2008

Moreover, appellant’s damages claims are barred by Heck v. … See also Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 , 117 S.Ct. 1584 , 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

869 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2012

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). Here, Wells Fargo does not argue that Brown has failed to state a claim for fraud or violations of the CPPA. … .”); Anderson v.

Fielding v. BT Alex Brown

116 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2000

See Ottenberg v. … See Jackson v.

Brown v. Mukasey

298 F. App'x 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

See Wayte v. U.S., 470 U.S. 598, 607 , 105 S.Ct. 1524 , 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985). Such discretionary decisions are not generally subject to judicial review. See Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

146 F.R.D. 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1992

See, e.g., Genden v. … See, for instance, Newberry v. Washington Post Co., 71 F.R.D. 25 (D.D.C.1976); Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 61 F.R.D. 427 (W.D.Mo.1973).

Gorman v. National Transportation Safety Board

558 F.3d 580 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2009

National Transportation Safety Board Steven A. … Bowman v.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

50 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1995

Fibre-board Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 211 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 402 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964). … Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 821 F.Supp. 20 (D.D.C.1993), reprinted in J.A. 2911. Finally, on March 1, 1994, the District Court awarded the Players’ counsel $1,744,-578.41 in attorney’s fees. Brown v.

Brown v. Roberts

298 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (quoting Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv., 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir. 1985) (other quotations omitted)). … (per curiam) (denying mandamus petition against Clerk of Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 844 , 113 S.Ct. 131 , 121 L.Ed.2d 85 (1992); Panko v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

493 F. App'x 110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2012

We hold that, in light of the circumstances of and arguments made in this case, Brown was required to demonstrate constructive discharge to receive front pay and back pay. Clark v. … We have also reviewed the trial record and conclude that the district court’s determination that Brown failed to demonstrate constructive discharge was not clearly erroneous. Fogg v.

Brown v. United States Parole Commission

190 F. Supp. 3d 186 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2016

Board of Parole released petitioner to parole supervision, where he was to remain until the expiration of his sentence on December 7, 2007. Ex. 3. … Exs. 5, 8; see United States v. Brown, 1996 FEL 007523 (Sup. Ct.). On April 22, 1998, the Parole Board issued “a detainer warrant based on [the foregoing] allegations of criminal violation(s) of parole.”

Brown v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2025

Co. v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33, 39 (1916). Mr. Brown’s claims severely miss the mark. … Webster v. Del Toro, 49 F.4th 562, 566 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (quoting Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 (1976)). 3 The Defendants also argue that Mr. Brown failed to exhaust administrative remedies under the FTCA. Defs.’

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

602 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2009

Lynn v. Lappin, 593 F.Supp.2d 104, 104 (D.D.C.2009); Jackson v. Bureau of Prisons, 538 F.Supp.2d 194, 199 (D.D.C.2008); Brown v. Bureau of Prisons, 498 F.Supp.2d 298, 304 (D.D.C. 2007). … Brown is serving two life sentences, after having been convicted by a jury of kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child, a ten-year-old daughter of friends. United States v.

Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance

21 App. D.C. 325 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1903

Brown v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394. *339 Substantially tbe same rule prevails in Massachusetts. King v. State Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 , 6; Fogg v. Middlesex Ins. Co., 10 Cush. 337 , 346; Palmer Sav. … King v. State Mut. Ins. Co., I Cush. 1, 6; Brown *341 v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394; Cone v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 60 N. Y. 619, 624 .