Opinion

Brown v. Mukasey

  • 298 F. App'x 9
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Oct 29, 2008
Status
Published
On the bench
Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.9%

The opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 29, 2008, be affirmed. The Attorney General of the United States has absolute discretion in deciding whether to investigate claims for possible civil or criminal prosecution. See Wayte v. U.S., 470 U.S. 598, 607 , 105 S.Ct. 1524 , 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985). Such discretionary decisions are not generally subject to judicial review. See Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480-81 (D.C.Cir.1995) (and cases cited therein).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.