Case law

Smith v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

364 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2010

705 S.E.2d 360 (2010) Phyllis Dianne SMITH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. … TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; Department of State Treasurer, Retirement Systems Division

Murphy v. . City of Charlotte

174 N.C. 771 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1917

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Butler (In Re Conner Corp.)

127 B.R. 775 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 15, 1991

Thus, although the Bank Board was acting in its regulatory sphere, a contract had been formed. See also Century Federal Sav. Bank v. … Labeling the conduct of the Bank Board as regulatory does not resolve the issue of whether that conduct also created a contract. In Resolution Trust Corp. v.

STATE EX REL. MOORE CTY. v. Pelletier

606 S.E.2d 907 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2005

606 S.E.2d 907 (2005) STATE of North Carolina, By and Through the MOORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. … The surety cites State v.

Madison v. International Paper Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 28, 2003

G.S. § 97-2 (6); Fields v. Tompkins-Johnston Plumbing Co., 224 N.C. 841 , 32 S.E.2d 623 (1945); Dillingham v. Yeargin Construction Co. , 320 N.C. 499 , 358 S.E.2d 380 (1987). … In Fields v.

Bouvier v. Porter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2021

BOUVIER V. … BOUVIER V.

Bowie v. Town of West Jefferson

231 N.C. 408 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1950

Where the town board got authority to do this does not appear; in this respect the statute seems to have been supplemented ex gratia; and whether future Boards would be so kind is not certain. As expressed in Stuart v. … In our own jurisdiction it is not an open question: Lexington v. Lopp, 210 N.C. 196, 197 , 185 S.E. 766 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N.C. 499, 514 , 115 S.E. 336 ; Lumber Co. v. Smith, 146 N.C. 199 , 59 S.E. 653 ; R. R. v.

State v. Rawls

70 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1984

As indicated in State v. Jenkins, 8 N.C. … Citing State v.

Richards v. Nationwide Homes

263 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

The case of Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 , relied on by claimant, is clearly distinguishable. … Brown had no franchise right independent of the defendant.” Tested by the standard set forth in Bryson v. Lumber Co., supra, and in Scott v.

Bateman v. . Sterrett

201 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931

C., 321 ; Brown v. Jennings, 188 N. C., 155 , 124 S. E., 150 ; Eubanks v. Becton, 158 N. C., 230 , 73 S. E., 1009 . … Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 125 ; Stanback v. Bank, 197 N. C., 292 , 148 S. E., 313 . Affirmed.

Sanders v. . Hamilton

229 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1948

Brown v. Osteen, 197 N. C., 305 , 148 S. E., 434 ; Meadows Co. v. Bryan, 195 N. C., 398 , 142 S. E., 487 ; Walter v. Kilpatrick, 191 N. C., 458 , 132 S. E., 148 ; Miller v. Marriner, 187 N. C., 449 , 121 S. … Brown v. Osteen, supra; Meadows Co. v. Bryan, supra; Walter v. Kilpatrick, supra; Dry-Kiln Co. v. Ellington, 172 N. C., 481 , 90 S. E., 564 ; 34 A. L. R., 897.

Chadwick v. . Insurance Co.

158 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

Cureton v. Garrison, 111 N. C., 272 ; Loftis v. Raxter, 66 N. C., 340 ; Wooley v. Robinson, 52 N. C., 30 . These *382 cases have been cited and approved, Sitton v. Lumber Co., 135 N. … In Brown v. R. R., 140 N.

State v. Stallings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 2020

Brown. … Brown denied knowing - 15 -  STATE V.

Costin v. Shell

53 N.C. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1981

See Loy v. Lorm, 52 N.C. App. 428 , 278 S.E. 2d 897 (1981). Our view of the record is in accord with the findings and judgment of the trial court. … Moreover, the Board offered in support of its summary judgment motion a letter signed by “Dr.

Johnson v. Eversole Lumber Co.

144 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1907

Justice Brown in McAden v. Palmer, supra, that it is sufficient to refer to the opinion in that case without repeating what is there so well said. … Blue v. Gilchrist, 84 N. C., 239 . It is true.that this claim, having accrued 27 June, 1856, was governed by the ten years’ statute of presumptions (R. C., ch. 65, sec. 19; Campbell v. Brown, 86 N.

Randolph Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2026

See Branch v. Bd. of Ed. of Robeson Cnty., 233 N.C. 623, 625 (1951). A school board is a political subdivision. Id. … A taxpayer may sue on behalf of a school board to recover funds wrongfully diverted from that school board when he is a taxpayer of that school board’s district. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs v. Trogdon, 124 N.C.

Brinson v. . Lacy

195 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1928

Walker, J., in Jones v. Williams, 155 N. C., 179 . Also in Culbreth v. Hall, 159 N. … Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Bird v. Gilliam, 125 N. C., 76 ; Morgan v. Bostic, 132 N. C., 751 . C.

Matthews v. Fry.

143 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1906

Summerlin v. Cowles, 107 N. C., 462 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 711 . … Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 103 ; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 118 N. C., 435 ; Walnut v. Wade, 103 U. S., 688 .

Beal v. Coastal Carriers, Inc.

251 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2016

Baird paid Michael Porter, Anthony Brown, Randy Wallace and Jeffrey Beal for the work they did for TWC in Florida. -7-  BEAL V. COASTAL CARRIERS, INC. … Oxendine v. Davis, 373 S.C. 438, 646 S.E.2d 143 (2007); Voss v. Ramco, Inc., 325 S.C. 560, 482 S.E.2d 582 (1997). 24.

Egelhof v. Szulik

2006 NCBC 4 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 13, 2006

Where no specific action of the board is challenged, however, Delaware courts apply the singular inquiry established in Rales v. Blasband. 634 A.2d 927 (Del. 1993). … Grimes v. Donald, 673 A.2d 1207, 1217 (Del. 1996); Grabow v.