Case law

Campbell v. United States Parole Commission

563 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2008

Board of Parole (“Board”) issued a violation warrant seeking his return to custody. (Resp’t Ex. C.) After a revocation hearing, the Board revoked Campbell’s parole on October 7, 1985. (Resp’t Ex. D.) … Lawson v.

Arellano v. DIST. OF COL. POLICE, ETC.

384 A.2d 29 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1978

Accord, Morgan v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 243, 245 (1973); see D.C.Code 1977 Supp., § 1-1510. … However, in Lewis v.

Duru v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 2018

at 1183 (quoting Milton v. Weinberger, 696 F.2d 94, 100 (D.C. Cir. 1982) and citing Pignato v. Am. Trans. … Brown’s infraction and chose not to discipline her. See Isse v. Am. Univ., 540 F.

RUTLAND COURT OWNERS, INC. v. Taylor

997 A.2d 706 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 2010

Lawlor v. District of Columbia, 758 A.2d 964, 974 (D.C.2000). The court’s judgment based on the facts will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it. Langon v. … Id. at 1121 (citing Radecki v. Joura, 114 F.3d 115, 116 (8th Cir.1997)).

In Re Glass

805 A.2d 236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2002

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Glass, 365 Md. 319 , 778 A.2d 1107 (2001). … XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility “Board”. The Board has recommended imposition of identical reciprocal discipline.

Schmidt v. Spencer

319 F. Supp. 3d 386 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2018

1552 (a)(1) ; see also Roberts v. … Jackson v. Mabus , 808 F.3d 933 , 936 (D.C. Cir. 2015) ; see also Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Matter of Solerwitz

601 A.2d 1083 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

By the same order, we directed the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the final discipline to be imposed; we requested the Board specifically to review the elements … See People v. Gorton, 60 Misc.2d 833 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 69 (1969) (removing magazine from library because it contained what defendant regarded as obscene passage lacked felonious intent necessary to establish larceny).

Adair v. England

417 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2006

Sampson v. … Mot. at 10; Carabillo v. ULLICO Inc.

Shook v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

132 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1998

Ayuda, Inc. v. … Hussey v. City of Portland, 64 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.1995); see Duncan v. Poythress, 667 F.2d 691 (5th Cir.

In Re Gilbert

538 A.2d 742 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1988

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Gilbert, 307 Md. 481 , 515 A.2d 454 (1986). … The only fully adjudicated case in this jurisdiction that presented a similar situation was Carver v.

Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

890 F.3d 1100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 2018

Univ. v. NLRB, 807 F.3d 308, 316 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Before the Board, ILWU did not challenge the Board remedy in light of the Employer’s settlement with IAM and its members. … See NLRB v.

Sperling v. Office of Information Policy

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2014

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) HERBERT SPERLING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: January 24, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Buzzfeed Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2024

Brown, B. Brown, and Schwartz). See Pl.’s Cross-Mot. at 5–8. … Brown and R. Brown. Id. ¶¶ 8–9. AUSA Schwartz stated that he did not have responsive records. Id. ¶ 9.

The American Bottling Company v. NLRB

992 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2021

Cir. 1987) (quoting NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946)). Board determinations regarding such matters are therefore “rarely to be disturbed,” South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 833 F.3d 202, 206 (D.C.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

533 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2008

Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Comm’n v. FERC, 522 F.3d 378, 398 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Turlock Irrigation District v. FERC

36 F.4th 1179 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2022

FERC distinguished the California Board’s denials without prejudice from Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, 913 F.3d 1099 (D.C. … Each time the California Board denied certification, the Board “act[ed]” within the meaning of section 401(a)(1). See N.Y. State Dep’t of Env’t Conservation v. FERC, 884 F.3d 450, 456 (2d Cir. 2018); N.Y.

Abbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development, Co.

576 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2008

P’ship v. Mass. Hous. Fin. … Scimed v.

Stainback v. Secretary of the Navy

520 F. Supp. 2d 181 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 2007

See Bethlehem Steel v. … Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 420 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971)); see also James Madison Ltd. v.

Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England

234 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2006

See, e.g., Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S.Ct. 1103 , 71 L.Ed.2d 199 (1982); St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 208, 218 , 82 S.Ct. 289 , 7 L.Ed.2d 240 (1961); Friedman v. … See ICG Commc’ns, Inc. v.

In re L.C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2025

v. … Moreover, there was evidence in Brown that the decedent was armed with a knife, had twice previously assaulted Mr. Brown with a knife, had threatened to kill Mr. Brown, and had been coming toward Mr.