Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.66s

  • Schwartz v. Pridy

    874 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 1995

    Government officials performing discretionary functions are provided with qualified immunity from a civil rights damages action if their challenged conduct does not “violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … The second prong of the qualified immunity analysis requires a determination of whether the constitutional right in question was “clearly established.” Id.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Johnson

    797 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, D. Montana · Jul 18, 2011

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity shields a government actor from a suit for damages if the actor could have reasonably believed his conduct was lawful, in light of clearly established law and the information possessed … With that determination it is necessary to turn to the second step in the qualified immunity analysis, i.e., whether the right violated by Deputy Johnson was clearly established in the law as of June 10, 2009. b.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Linlor v. Polson

    263 F. Supp. 3d 613 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 11, 2017

    In evaluating whether Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, the Court must determine “(1) whether the plaintiff has established the violation of a constitutional right, and (2) whether that right was clearly established … of qualified immunity.”

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • White v. Bibb County, Georgia

    28 F. Supp. 2d 1374 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Dec 7, 1998

    To overcome qualified immunity, the plaintiffs must show (1) that Defendant God-bee violated their constitutional rights and (2) that those rights were clearly established at the time of the violation. … It is well settled in the Eleventh Circuit that “the law can be ‘clearly established’ for qualified immunity purposes only by decisions of the U.S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Williams v. ONTARIO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.

    662 F. Supp. 2d 321 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 21, 2009

    Qualified immunity shields law enforcement officials who perform discretionary functions from liability if their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable prison … to qualified immunity.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Hearle

    639 F. Supp. 2d 352 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 2009

    Qualified Immunity Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials are shielded from liability flowing from their performance of discretionary functions as long as “their conduct does not violate clearly established … Granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on grounds of qualified immunity is proper “only ‘if the court finds that the asserted rights were not clearly established, or if the evidence is such that, even when it is

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • John S. Pleasant v. Larry Lovell, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and Tim Fortune

    876 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jun 6, 1989

    Defendant Fortune has qualified immunity for his technical consensual monitoring assistance; no clearly established first or fourth amendment right was violated. … After applying clearly established fourth amendment principles, we reject the contention that these defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Est of La'Mello Parker v. MS Dept

    140 F.4th 226 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 6, 2025

    Coon therefore cannot provide the clearly established law necessary to overcome qualified immunity. 58 Plaintiffs also cite Grandstaff, but it, too, is distinguishable. … established at the time of the incident—and qualified immunity applies.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Michael A. Bolden, Sr. v. Al Alston, Superintendent, Lincoln Correctional Facility, Nathaniel Hayes, Sergeant and Edward Kirkland, Sergeant

    810 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 1987

    Concluding that these rights had been clearly established by June 1982, the District Judge rejected appellants’ defense of official good faith immunity. … They contend that, even if they deprived Bolden of some due process rights, they did not contravene clearly established law and are therefore entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 123 timesPublished
  • Tyson v. Willauer

    289 F. Supp. 2d 190 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 23, 2003

    However, qualified immunity shields them from liability under § 1983 “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Here, in support of their qualified immunity defense, Defendants assert that no clearly established right was violated and that Defendants’ entry into Plaintiffs’ residence to execute a valid arrest warrant was lawful and

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Williams v. County of Alameda

    26 F. Supp. 3d 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2014

    An officer will receive qualified immunity if a reasonable officer could have believed the action to be lawful, in 'light of clearly established law and the information the officer possessed. Id. … Even an officer who reasonably, but mistakenly, believed that his conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional right will receive qualified immunity. See Saucier, 533 U.S. at 205-206, 121 S.Ct. 2151 .

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Ciolino v. Eastman

    128 F. Supp. 3d 366 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 3, 2015

    Second Prong: Clearly Established Right The disputes of fact discussed above also preclude the Court from finding that the constitutional rights allegedly violated were not “clearly established,” such that Defendants would … be entitled to qualified immunity on the second prong of the test.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Willie Bigford, Jr. v. Joe Max Taylor, Individually and as Sheriff of Galveston County, Texas

    896 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 23, 1990

    action generally turns on the ‘objective legal reasonableness’ of the action ... assessed in light of the legal rules that were ‘clearly established’ at the time it was taken.” … For the legal rules to be considered “clearly established,” the “contours” of the right alleged to have been violated “must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Does

    764 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2014

    Qualified Immunity “Qualified immunity protects public officials from liability for civil damages when one of two conditions is satisfied: (a) the defendant’s action did not violate clearly established law, or (b) it was … Defendants bear the burden of establishing qualified immunity. Vincent v. Yelick, 718 F.3d 157, 166 (2d Cir.2013).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cathy Burns v. Rick Reed

    44 F.3d 524 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 1995

    Qualified immunity protects public officials from civil suit based on their discretionary functions except where such conduct violated “clearly established” law. Sherman v. … The Supreme Court’s test for qualified immunity has been summarized by this Court as follows; In determining whether the right alleged to have been violated was “clearly established,” the constitutional right must be identified

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Mccloud v. Testa

    97 F.3d 1536 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 13, 1997

    Finally, as an additional guidepost we note that, as a practical matter, invocation of the Rice canon and the general availability of qualified immunity will move in tandem, because if it is already clearly established that … immunity context, where the key inquiry is whether a principle of law is clearly established, may be perceived as problematic.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Hogan ex rel. J.H. v. County of Lewis

    929 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, N.D. New York · Mar 8, 2013

    The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials acting in their capacity from liability for civil damages as long as their conduct does not “violate clearly-established rights of which an objectively reasonable … The party invoking qualified immunity bears the burden of offering proof that it was objectively reasonable for her to believe that her actions did not violate a clearly established right and that she is entitled to qualified

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nicole Guerriero v. City of Delray Beach

    Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 21, 2024

    To establish a prima facie case, she must show that (1) “she belong[ed] to a pro- tected class,” (2) “she was subjected to an adverse employment ac- tion,” (3) “she was qualified to perform the job … GTE Fla., Inc., 226 F.3d 1249, 1255 (11th Cir. 2000) (holding that evidence showing that plaintiff was “clearly more qualified” in one area relevant for the job did not establish that employer’s decision

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • James Byron Green v. Margaret Baron, Joan Wright, Sherri Shea, Dr. R.T. Lara, and Gary Kirchhof

    925 F.2d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 6, 1991

    To determine if the employees are entitled to qualified immunity, we must first decide whether Green has invoked a constitutional right that was clearly established when the conduct in question occurred. See Harlow v. … Thus, when Green entered Oakdale, it was clearly established he could not be punished.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gary Jacobsen v. Michael Klinefelter

    992 F.3d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 30, 2021

    The court concluded that Klinefelter did not violate a clearly established right of Jacobsen’s under the Fourth Amendment and was therefore entitled to qualified immunity on the excessive force claim. … To overcome a defense of qualified immunity, Jacobsen must show that the evidence would support a finding that Klinefelter violated Jacobsen’s rights under the Fourth Amendment, and that the right was clearly established

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.