Case law

Thomas v. Buckley

176 A.3d 1277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2017

See Logan v. … In the context of historic landmark preservation, the Historic Preservation Review Board “is empowered to ‘designate and; maintain a current inventory of historic landmarks-’” Embassy Real Estate Holdings, LLC v.

Oscar H. Mendoza v. National Labor Relations Board

948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1991

MENDOZA, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 90-1589. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 2, 1991. Before BUCKLEY, D.H. … Substantially for the reasons appearing in the Board's decision, we agree with the Board's interpretation of the contract.

Dorsey v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2010

Council member Michael Brown. Id. at 3. B. … Council member Michael Brown] according to the Freedom of Information Act of the District of Columbia”).

Clydesdale, Inc. v. Wegener

372 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 1977

Ass’n v. Pinkett, D.C.Mun. App., 85 A.2d 58 (1951); Valois, Inc. v. Thorne, D.C.Mun.App., 86 A.2d 530 (1952). … Ass’n v. Pinkett, supra at 61 (Hood, J., dissenting).

DHSC, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2019

Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Board’s decision easily clears that bar. 1. … We leave it to the Board to determine in compliance proceedings how its order can be carried out. See Bolivar Tee’s Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 61 F. App’x 711, 711 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v.

Edmonds v. United States

609 A.2d 1131 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

Dunn v. United States , 284 U.S. 390 , 393 , 52 S.Ct. 189 , 190 , 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932) (Holmes, J.); accord, e.g., United States v. Powell , 469 U.S. 57 , 105 S.Ct. 471 , 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984); Steadman v. … Chambers v. United States , 564 A.2d 26 , 31 (D.C. 1989); Shorter v. United States , 506 A.2d 1133 , 1135 (D.C. 1986).

Feinerman v. Bernardi

558 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2008

Corp. v. … Co. of Am. v.

The American Bottling Company v. NLRB

992 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2021

Cir. 1987) (quoting NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946)). Board determinations regarding such matters are therefore “rarely to be disturbed,” South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 833 F.3d 202, 206 (D.C.

Matter of Solerwitz

601 A.2d 1083 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

By the same order, we directed the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the final discipline to be imposed; we requested the Board specifically to review the elements … See People v. Gorton, 60 Misc.2d 833 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 69 (1969) (removing magazine from library because it contained what defendant regarded as obscene passage lacked felonious intent necessary to establish larceny).

Wine & Liquor Salesmen & Allied Workers Local Union 195, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Brescome Distributors Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. The Brescome Distributors Corporation, Wine & Liquor Salesmen & Allied Workers Local Union 195, Etc., Intervenor

452 F.2d 1312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1971

P 12,159 WINE & LIQUOR SALESMEN & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION #195, etc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Brescome Distributors Corporation, Intervenor. … NLRB v. Elliott-Williams Company, 345 F.2d 460, 463 (7th Cir. 1965); Warner Company v. NLRB, 365 F.2d 435, 437 (3rd Cir. 1966); NLRB v.

James C. Jones v. United States

231 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1956

See also Ercoli v. United States, 1942, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 131 F.2d 354 . In Brown v. … In the instant case, as in Brown, we have no testimony from the child and no evidence reflecting injury to her. *246 In Dickey v.

United States v. Michael A. Whren

53 F.3d 371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1995

Soto opened the door, dove across Brown and grabbed the other bag from Whren’s left hand. Officer Littlejohn pinned Brown to the back of the driver’s seat so that he could not move. … See United States v.

Thornwell v. United States

471 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 1979

Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954). *350 In United States v. Brown, supra, the Supreme Court held that the Feres bar did not apply to an injury sustained by a veteran six years after his discharge. … Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954), and Hungerford v.

Culp v. United States

486 A.2d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1985

Jackson v. United States, 357 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C. 1976). Such a defense, however, “must have some reasonable basis.” Id.; Gaetano v. … McGloin v. United States, 232 A.2d 90, 91 (D.C.1967).

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

168 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

We will “uphold the Board’s determination unless it has ‘acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying'established law to the facts at issue.’ ” Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … National Treasury Employees Union v.

Robert O. Clouser, Individually and as Members of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Hot Shoppes, Inc., a Corporation

346 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1965

by counsel; and the trial judge having determined that the administrative record as stipulated is insufficient for the achievement of finality and having accordingly directed a remand for further proceedings before the Board

Cape Cod Hospital v. Leavitt

565 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2008

Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Gov’t Auth., 310 F.Supp.2d 172, 176 (D.D.C.2004); see McNutt v. Gen. … Chiropractic Ass’n v. Leavitt, 431 F.3d 812, 816 (D.C.Cir.2005) (citations omitted); see also Weinberger v.

Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

381 F. Supp. 1003 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1974

DePinto v. Provident Security Life Ins. … Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386, 409 , 65 S. Ct. 373 , 89 L.Ed. 322 (1945); Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329-330 , 64 S. Ct. 587 , 88 L.Ed. 754 (1944); Swift & Co. v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Bell Supervisors Protective Association (Not a Labor Organization) v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1972

B. v. … See, e. g., Dallas Mailers Union, Local 143 v. NLRB, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 445 F.2d 730 (1971) 5 The Board won judicial approval of the Oakland Mailers doctrine in Dallas Mailers Union, Local No. 143 v.

Temple University Hospital v. NLRB

39 F.4th 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2022

Ass’n v. NLRB, 499 U.S. 606, 608, 615–17 (1991). … Hammontree v. NLRB, 925 F.2d 1486, 1491–92 (D.C.