Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • Matter of Solerwitz

    601 A.2d 1083 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

    By the same order, we directed the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the final discipline to be imposed; we requested the Board specifically to review the elements … See People v. Gorton, 60 Misc.2d 833 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 69 (1969) (removing magazine from library because it contained what defendant regarded as obscene passage lacked felonious intent necessary to establish larceny).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wine & Liquor Salesmen & Allied Workers Local Union 195, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Brescome Distributors Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. The Brescome Distributors Corporation, Wine & Liquor Salesmen & Allied Workers Local Union 195, Etc., Intervenor

    452 F.2d 1312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1971

    P 12,159 WINE & LIQUOR SALESMEN & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION #195, etc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Brescome Distributors Corporation, Intervenor. … NLRB v. Elliott-Williams Company, 345 F.2d 460, 463 (7th Cir. 1965); Warner Company v. NLRB, 365 F.2d 435, 437 (3rd Cir. 1966); NLRB v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gill v. Gill

    147 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1945

    Oklahoma v. Texas, 256 U.S. 70, 86, 88 , 41 S.Ct. 420 , 65 L.Ed. 831 . Shellman v, Shellman, 68 App.D.C. 197 , 95 F.2d 108 . Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 311 , 122 F.2d 219, 221 . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 ; Geracy, Inc. v. Hoover, 77 U.S.App. 55, 58, 133 F.2d 25, 28 ; see Spruill v. Serven, 68 App.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Culp v. United States

    486 A.2d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1985

    Jackson v. United States, 357 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C. 1976). Such a defense, however, “must have some reasonable basis.” Id.; Gaetano v. … McGloin v. United States, 232 A.2d 90, 91 (D.C.1967).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

    168 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

    We will “uphold the Board’s determination unless it has ‘acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying'established law to the facts at issue.’ ” Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … National Treasury Employees Union v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schwalier v. Panetta

    839 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2012

    Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … the final Board decision and not the underlying personnel action.4 Finally, Brigadier General Schwalier relies on Lebrun v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Borud v. Del Toro

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2025

    FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11, 25 (1998). Courts have done precisely that in response to flawed decisions by the Board. See, e.g., Penland v. Mabus, 181 F. … Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Nat. Res. Def.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Anthony Cutchin

    956 F.2d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1992

    In response, Officer Taylor stopped a brown car in the area but did not detain it. … See United States v. Longmire, 761 F.2d 411, 417-18 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Robinson, 536 F.2d 1298 (9th Cir.1976).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • United States v. Paxton

    1 D.C. 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1801

    The Court directed the jury that if they should be of opinion that the defendant sold the liquor as clerk, agent, servant, or barkeeper of Brown, then he was not guilty. … It was the selling of Brown within the meaning of the act. See also post, United States v. Shuck, Alexandria, January term, 1802, (p. 56,) and United Stales v. Voss.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kincade v. Wah

    38 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1944

    Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co., 292 U.S. 20 , 54 S.Ct. 584 , 78 L.Ed, 1096; Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Smith & Gottlieb, Inc. v. Cheatham, D.C. Mun.App., 31 A.2d 676 ; Scholl et al. v. … Bedrosian v. Wong Kok Chung, D.C.Mun.App., 33 A.2d 811 . The judgment is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial. Reversed. Code 1940, § 11—735.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Robert O. Clouser, Individually and as Members of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Hot Shoppes, Inc., a Corporation

    346 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1965

    by counsel; and the trial judge having determined that the administrative record as stipulated is insufficient for the achievement of finality and having accordingly directed a remand for further proceedings before the Board

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Bell Supervisors Protective Association (Not a Labor Organization) v. National Labor Relations Board

    487 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1972

    B. v. … See, e. g., Dallas Mailers Union, Local 143 v. NLRB, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 445 F.2d 730 (1971) 5 The Board won judicial approval of the Oakland Mailers doctrine in Dallas Mailers Union, Local No. 143 v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McLean v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    506 A.2d 1135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1986

    Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983) (citing In re Dwyer, 399 A.2d 1, 12 (D.C.1979); Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning, 409 A.2d 1067, 1070 (D.C.1979)). … E.g., Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 449 A.2d 301, 307 (D.C.1982).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Albino v. United States

    78 F. Supp. 3d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2015

    Occidental Eng'g Co. v. … Rudo v. Geren, 818 F.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In Re Berryman

    764 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2000

    See Berryman v. Thorne, 700 A.2d 181 (D.C.1997). The Hearing Committee found that, “by depositing the estate funds of $939.84 into the Citizens Account, [Ms. … Inst. of Architects v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 594 A.2d 83, 87 (D.C.1991)). Thus, the Board owed no deference to the Hearing Committee’s finding of negligent misappropriation.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Temple University Hospital v. NLRB

    39 F.4th 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2022

    Ass’n v. NLRB, 499 U.S. 606, 608, 615–17 (1991). … Hammontree v. NLRB, 925 F.2d 1486, 1491–92 (D.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan Habib

    424 F.2d 891 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1970

    Brown v. Plant, D.C.Mun.App., 157 A.2d 289, 291 (1960). 17 . As this court said in Holmes v. … Lane v. Brown, supra Note 35. 47 . Gardner v. California, supra Note 37. 48 . 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966). 49 .

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2013

    Ci v. P. 16(f). (ECF No. 10.) Defendant subsequently filed its own Motion for Sanctions, asking the Court to dismiss the case pursuant to Fed R. Civ. … Date: August 2, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Cloud

    939 A.2d 653 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2007

    Cloud argues should have been considered by the Board, the evidence was more than sufficient to support its findings and, in light of such cases as Anderson and Utley , its recommendation. V. … See Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Reid, 666 A.2d 41, 42-44 (D.C.1995). 3 . Ms. Dean was offered the $24,000 settlement as a result of negotiations by her previous attorney, Kathleen Dolan.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Michael A. Whren

    53 F.3d 371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1995

    Soto opened the door, dove across Brown and grabbed the other bag from Whren’s left hand. Officer Littlejohn pinned Brown to the back of the driver’s seat so that he could not move. … See United States v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.