Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersLA

10,000+ results

7.02s

  • Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge

    309 So. 2d 659 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 17, 1975

    Clearly the acute parking problem has been one of long standing. … The record clearly establishes that only the subject property has received special treatment in the city zoning regulations.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Darcy Driver, Deann Driver & Danielle Driver-Roussel, Individually and On Behalf of Their Parents, Albert Driver, Jr. and Kathie Driver v. Willis Knighton Pierremont Health Center

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 2025

    that the fact finder is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous. … We find that the jury’s verdict is clearly wrong, manifestly erroneous, and must be reversed. The record reflects testimony that established the standard of care owed by the defendants to Mr. Driver.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fruge v. Trahan

    194 So. 2d 478 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1967

    If Fruge actually slipped and fell, as indicated *484 by some of the testimony, then that clearly would have been the proximate cause of the accident and no negligence on the part of the truck driver could be inferred from … Since plaintiff has failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendants, the trial judge correctly rejected his demands.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Manning

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 8, 2021

    contentions are clearly baseless. Id. … Under Louisiana law, an entity must qualify as a 6 See Bailey, 647 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McHugh, III v. St. Tammany Parish

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 9, 2024

    “Furthermore,” the panel continued, “the action did not purport to establish a general policy; it was particular to [the clerk].” Id. … The panel held that only the fourth set of activities qualified as “legislative.” See id. at 273–74.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Red River Parish Port Commission v. Headwaters Resources Inc.

    698 F. Supp. 2d 684 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 19, 2010

    The $10,000 is clearly the result of the application of the previously established wharfage rate for fly ash, $0.20 per ton, to the 50,000 ton minimum cargo requirement. 30 The language also establishes the annual time frame … The agreement between Headwaters and the Port Commission establishing an obligation for Headwaters to build the barge loading facility qualifies as an agreement for a "public work” under the Public Bid Law. See La.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Minor Children v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 2024

    The trial court erred in ordering the “harsh, drastic remedy” of preliminary injunctive relief because the Plaintiff failed to establish a clear violation of either La. … First, it is plain to us that, based on our previous discussion, the Archdiocese qualifies as a place of public accommodation by virtue of the state funding it receives. Next, La.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ritter v. U-Park System of Louisiana, Inc.

    98 La.App. 4 Cir. 1699 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1999

    The defendant relies upon the | ¡immunity clause in La. … The contract clearly informs the owner of the vehicle that | ¿this is a mere lease and not a deposit or “bailment” which would impose further responsibilities on the owner of the parking lot.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rouse v. Ard

    District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jan 8, 2020

    Lastly, Sheriff Ard is entitled to qualified immunity. … Dist., 891 F.3d 214, 220 (5th Cir. 2018) (qualified immunity protects officials from actions for money damages unless the official violates a clearly established right).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shaw v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

    170 So. 2d 874 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1965

    Clearly this was a dangerous and hazardous condition which could have been remedied easily by installing a floor and walls or hand rails between the cars. … Apparently defendant’s objection is that Reuther was not qualified as an expert on “work trains”. It is not shown wherein that fact would make a difference.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. Scott

    52 La. Ann. 512 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 15, 1900

    Pardee, Judge, the said order placing the receivers in possession of all the property, effects or rights of said company, including any and all franchises, rights, immunities, donations, subsidies, etc.; that said receivers … qualified and took possession of all of said property, and that they and their successors have since proceeded with the collection of said subsidies and taxes now in contest, as well as all others; that on October 23rd,

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Department of Highways

    141 So. 2d 669 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 21, 1962

    This the Department was able to establish in both the Dickson and Burton cases. The facts in those cases, however, are different from the facts presented here. … The evidence clearly indicates that the Department intended to abolish Bennett’s job as being no longer necessary to the efficient operation of the Department.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    97 La.App. 4 Cir. 1546 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1999

    It is in this regard that this case is clearly distinguishable from Miller. Mr. … Thus there was ample evidence to establish that Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Banks v. LeBlanc

    District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Aug 27, 2019

    deliberate indifference, the Court need not fully examine the qualified immunity defense. 41 R. … To establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADA, a plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) that he has a qualifying disability; (2) that he is being excluded from 89 The medical records in this matter show consistent

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raymond A. Crawford and Alice Crawford v. William Karl Ordoyne, Jr., M.D. and Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, through the State of Louisiana, LSU Health Care Service Division

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2025

    LeBlanc opined that " the imaging studies, particularly the CT scans referenced above, clearly show that all tacks used by Dr. … Bonner' s affidavit clearly states that his opinions were formulated after reviewing the medical records presented to him, which include the CT reports at issue, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGurk v. City of Shreveport

    191 So. 553 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1939

    “Plaintiff does not know when, by whom, or under whose authority, nor upon whose property, the sidewalk was laid; and, further, defendant Compere and the officials of the City of Shreveport are or should be better qualified … These authorities are clearly inapplicable.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Corey

    339 So. 2d 804 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 8, 1976

    This clearly distinguishes Hodgeson from Launey and the instant case. … Unquestionably, certain exceptions to the hearsay rule are clearly desirable.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Burnett v. Lewis

    2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0020 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 2003

    that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). … The trial court erred in giving credence to the testimony of experts who otherwise would not have qualified under the criteria established in the principles of Daubert v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State, in Interest of Dj

    2006 La.App. 4 Cir. 1491 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 16, 2007

    the factfinder is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous". … In order to protect his right to confidentiality and privacy, he will be identified solely by his initials. [2] Qualified Mental Retardation Professional. [3] Dr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Parish v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

    361 F. Supp. 1220 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 31, 1973

    Rights, privileges and immunities not derived from the federal Constitution or secured thereby are left exclusively to the protection of the states.’ … To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. He must have more than a unilateral expectation of it.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.