Case law

Woodbury v. Gardner

77 Me. 68 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1885

Stearns v. Hubbard, 8 Maine, 320 ; Wilton v. Harwood, 23 Maine, 131; Bubier v. Bubier, 24 Maine, 42; Farnham v. Clements, 51 Maine, 426. … So, in the absence of such relationship, where a husband and wife accepted the offer of an aged person in poor health, that if they would give himself and nurse lodging and board in a certain house and take care of him until

Bolton v. Bolton

73 Me. 299 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 1882

Soc. v. Clendenien, 44 Md. 429 ; Arthur v. Odd Fel. Ben. Asso. 29 Ohio St. 557, 376 ; Ken. Mas. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 13 Bush. (Ken.) 489; Masons’ Benev. Soc. v. Winthrop, 85 Ill. 537 ; Same v. … Brown, 7 Maine, 420 ; Elder v. Elder, 10 Maine, 80,) it does admit, by necessity, sufficient extrinsic testimony to apply them to the subjects and objects to which by their terms they refer. Eveleth v.

Allegiance Fin. Group, Inc. v. Camden Nat'l Corp.

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 23, 2001

Richard responded to questions generated by the members of the board of directors during Mr. Daigle’s discussion with the board regarding the plaintiffs proposal. See PI.’s Ex. 8. … See Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19, { 8, 723 A.2d 876, 879 (breach of contract); Sun Lumber v. Loiselle, 593 A.2d 213, 215 (Me. 1991) (account annexed); Harmony Homes Corp, v. Cragg, 390 A.2d 1033, 1035-36 (Me. 1978).

Agway, Inc. v. Ernst

394 A.2d 774 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1978

In 1969, Agway’s Board of Directors voted to discontinue its 2% discount policy. … Gulf Oil Corp. v. Lone Star Producing Co., 322 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1963), Savage v. Crag Lumber Co., 177 Cal.App.2d 770 , 2 Cal.Rptr. 498 (1960); Gilmore v. Texas Co., 100 Fla. 169 , 129 So. 587 (1930); Smart v.

Sawyer Envtl. Facilities, Inc. Sawyer Envtl. Facilities, Inc. v. Inhabs. of the Town of Hampden, Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 8, 2000

” to be an unconstitutional grant of power to a zoning board. … Section 5.4.A.2 allows the Board “to express a legislative-type opinion about what is appropriate for the community.” Wakelin v. Town of Yarmouth, 523 A.2d at 577.

State v. Rowe

238 A.2d 217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1968

State v. Walton, 1873, 62 Me. 106, 109 . See also State v. Keen, 1852, 34 Me. 500 ; State v. Gurney, 1853, 37 Me. 149 ; State v. Webber, 1926, 125 Me. 319, 322 , 133 A. 738, 741 . … Casper, 1958, 106 Ohio App. 176 , 154 N.E.2d 9 ; Krusoczky v. State, 1923, 108 Ohio St. 430 , 140 N.E. 614 ; State v. O’Dell, 1918, 187 Ind. 84 , 118 N.E. 529 ; State v. Brown, 1963, R.I., 196 A.2d 138 .

United States v. The Tug Richard J. Moran

201 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 10, 1962

MORAN (ex MAINE) for damages sustained by the SS SAMUEL JOHNSTON and the SS HELEN HUNT JACKSON in a collision, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the tug, on March 29, 1947, at Brown’s Wharf, Portland, Maine … United *572 States v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720 , 22 U.S. 720, 735-737 , 6 L.Ed. 199 (1824); United States v. Insley, 130 U.S. 263 , 9 S.Ct. 485 , 32 L.Ed. 968 (1889); see United States v.

Ehrenfeld v. Webber

499 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 4, 1980

E. g., Burns v. Anderson, 502 F.2d 970 (5 Cir. 1974); Nelson v. Keefer, 451 F.2d 289 (3 Cir. 1971); Turner v. Wilson Line, 242 F.2d 414 (1 Cir. 1957); Bewley v. Sims, 438 F.Supp. 708 (D.Md.1977). … Deutsch v. Hewes Street Realty Corp., 359 F.2d 96, 100 (2 Cir. 1966); Fritz v. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co., supra, 349 F.Supp. at 1253 ; Brown v. Bodak, 188 F.Supp. 532, 534 (S.D.N.Y.1960).

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Maine Employers' Mut. Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2001

In the same proceeding before the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), Liberty filed a petition for review of incapacity. … From all of this, the court concludes the Board HO lacked authority to apportion medical benefits between these two insurers, Hincks v.

State v. Elwell

156 Me. 193 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 1960

Prince v. Skillin, 71 Me. 361, 366 . See also Racine v. Hunt, 116 Me. 188 , 100 A. 911 , and Russell v. Stevens, 118 Me. 101 , 106 A. 115 . … This section refers to the decision in State v. Brown, 5 R. I. 1.

Paper v. S.D. Warren Co.

229 F.R.D. 28 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 24, 2005

Burrell v. Anderson, 353 F.Supp.2d 55, 59 (D.Me.2005); Toomey v. Unum Life Ins. Co., 324 F.Supp.2d 220, 222 (D.Me.2004); Currier Builders, Inc. v. Town of York, 2002 WL 1146773 *5, 2002 U.S. Dist. … As a member, he is very familiar with procedures before the Board, and familiar with the laws applied.

Levine v. Keybank National Ass'n

861 A.2d 678 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 2004

Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, ¶ 9 , 788 A.2d 168, 170 . … In Thomas v.

Fernald v. Town of Elliot

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 4, 2006

Yusem v. Town of Raymond, 2001 ME 61, P7, 769 A.2d 865, 869. As the party seelung to overturn the ZBA's decision, Mr. Fernald has the burden of establishing that the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Herrick v. … In other words, a demonstr-;itionthat no competent evidence supports the ZRA's findings is required in order to vacate the board's decision. Thacker v. Knnnver Dev. Corp., 2003 ME 30, T 8, 818 A.2d 1013, 1017.

Durstin v. Dodge

138 Me. 12 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1941

The plaintiff relies on Fenlason v. Shedd et al., 109 Me., 326, 84 A., 409 ; Westbrook Manufacturing Company v. Grant, 60 Me., 88; and Windsor v. China, 4 Me., 298. Fenlason v. … In Second National Bank v.

Wilson v. Inhabs. of the City of Saco

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 2, 2004

and Zoning Board Appeals. … Hodson v. Town of Hermon, 2000 ME 181, 75, 760 A.2d 221, 222.

Ford v. Jorgensen Consulting LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Jun 30, 2021

Ford, Plaintiff v. Adv. Proc. … See Lassman v. Keefe (In re Keefe), 401 B.R. 520, 526 (B.A.P. Ist Cir. 2009).

ROSS v. POLKY

District Court, D. Maine · Oct 22, 2024

Brown, 520 U.S. at 406-407. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997) (“[I]n a narrow range of circumstances, a violation of federal rights may be a highly predictable consequence of a failure to [train officials]”).

Ward v. School Directors, Maine School Administrative District No. 56

384 A.2d 681 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 1978

Ward’s request was taken up by the board of directors of MSAD # 56 at an October 10 meeting, but no decision was made at that time. … Parker v. Maynard Boyce, Inc., 74 F.Supp. 581 (S.D.Cal.1946); Lee v. Remington Rand, Inc., 68 F.Supp. 837 (S.D.Cal.1946); Dodds v. Williams, 68 F.Supp. 995 (D.Ariz.1946), aff’d, 163 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1947). *686 II.

Rines v. Scott

432 A.2d 767 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1981

Steele v. … As stated in Brown’s Case, 123 Me. 424, 425 , 123 A. 421 (1924), “[b]y all authorities an occurrence to be accidental must be unusual, undesigned, unexpected, sudden.”

State v. Day

538 A.2d 1166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1988

Co. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 513 A.2d 283, 286 (Me.1986); Stone v. Board of Registration of Medicine, 503 A.2d 222, 227 (Me.1986). … See State v.