Case law

Fernald v. Town of Elliot

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 4, 2006

Yusem v. Town of Raymond, 2001 ME 61, P7, 769 A.2d 865, 869. As the party seelung to overturn the ZBA's decision, Mr. Fernald has the burden of establishing that the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Herrick v. … In other words, a demonstr-;itionthat no competent evidence supports the ZRA's findings is required in order to vacate the board's decision. Thacker v. Knnnver Dev. Corp., 2003 ME 30, T 8, 818 A.2d 1013, 1017.

Doyle v. Household Credit Services, Inc.

844 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 25, 1994

Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1213, at 131 (1990); Ayala Serrano v. … which has been disclosed to the creditor, unless that address was furnished less than twenty days before the end of billing cycle for which the statement is required. (7) Any other error described in regulations of the Board

United States v. The Tug Richard J. Moran

201 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 10, 1962

MORAN (ex MAINE) for damages sustained by the SS SAMUEL JOHNSTON and the SS HELEN HUNT JACKSON in a collision, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the tug, on March 29, 1947, at Brown’s Wharf, Portland, Maine … United *572 States v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720 , 22 U.S. 720, 735-737 , 6 L.Ed. 199 (1824); United States v. Insley, 130 U.S. 263 , 9 S.Ct. 485 , 32 L.Ed. 968 (1889); see United States v.

Ford v. Jorgensen Consulting, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Jun 30, 2021

Ford, Plaintiff v. Adv. Proc. … See Lassman v. Keefe (In re Keefe), 401 B.R. 520, 526 (B.A.P. Ist Cir. 2009).

State of Maine v. Pagnani

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2017

Underneath it; he located a sandwich baggie containing .5 total baggies of a tan/brown powder. … See generally Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983); United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976); Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218 (1973); Schmerber v.

Russell v. Stevens

118 Me. 101 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 1919

Smith et al. v. Pease, 27 N. Y., 45 ; People ex rel. Judson v. Thatcher, supra; Reid v. Julian, 2 Bart., 822, cited at length in McCrary on Elections, 4th ed. sec. 572.” … Benner v. Payson, 110 Maine, 204, 207; Libby v. English, 110 Maine, 449, 459; Murray v. Waite, 113 Maine, 485, 492.

Marchavich's Case

123 Me. 495 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 14, 1924

established that the finding that the accident is compensable may be supported by inferences, provided those inferences are reasonable, and not based merely upon surmise, conjecture, guess or speculation, for the Accident Board … Akin to this principle is the rule laid down in Atkins v. Field, 89 Maine, 281, that the “question of further delay was for the presiding justice to decide in the exercise of a sound discretion.

Ford v. Jorgensen Consulting LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Jun 30, 2021

Ford, Plaintiff v. Adv. Proc. … See Lassman v. Keefe (In re Keefe), 401 B.R. 520, 526 (B.A.P. Ist Cir. 2009).

S. D. Warren Co. v. Fritz

138 Me. 279 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1942

United States, supra,) appeals for review of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals in internal revenue cases (Old Colony Trust Co. et al. v. … E., 396 ; McAllister v.

Maine State Bd. of Nursing v. Lanning

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 26, 2003

AD-02-001 MAINE STATE BOARD OF NURSING, et al., Plaintiff V. DONALD L. GaraasofECISION AND ORDER PATRICIA E. … Senty v. Board of Osteophatic Examination & Registration, 594 A.2d 1068 (Me. 1991).

Penobscot Railroad v. White

41 Me. 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

In the case of these plaintiffs v. … In the case of these plaintiffs v.

Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad

100 Me. 430 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1905

Railroad Co. v. Beatty, 36 Ind. 15 ; Evansville and Terre Haute Railroad Co. v. Willis, 93 Ind. 507 ; Morris v. St. Louis, Kansas City and Northern Railway Co., 58 Mo. 78 ; Grosse v. … In Davis v. The Burlington and Mo.

Cleaves v. Braman

103 Me. 154 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 11, 1907

George v. Cox, 114 Mass. 382 . … See also Charley v. Potthoff, Wis. 95 N. W; 124; Elmer v. Fessenden, 151 Mass. 359 ; Peirson v. Boston El. Ry., 191 Mass. 223 ; Etna v. Brewer, 78 Maine, 377.

Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. LaFaver

834 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 3, 1993

See, e.g., Marigold Foods, Inc. v. Redalen, 809 F.Supp. 714 (D.Minn.1992); Farmland Dair *29 ies v. McGuire, 789 F.Supp. 1243 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Baldivin v. G.A.F. … Distillers Corp. v.

Martin v. G.W.V.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 23, 2015

With respect to plaintiffs showing of emotional distress, the Law Court's decision in Jacques v. … Brown, 609 A.2d 290, 292-93 (Me. 1992), demonstrates that a plaintiff seeking damages for sexual assault is not required to offer the kind of specificity that might otherwise be required in order to justify an attachment

Haynes v. Jackson

744 A.2d 1050 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2000

See Masters v. … See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee, 422 A.2d 998, 1002 (Me.1980). 9 .

MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · May 22, 2019

s Trial Memo); see Averill v. Cone, 129 Me. 9, 149 A. 297 (1930); Dixon v. Dixon, 123 Me. 470, 124 A. 198 (1924); Wyman v. Porter, 108 Me. 110, 79 A. 371 (1911); Lord v. Crowell, 75 Me. 399 (1883); Jordon v. … Cheney, 74 Me. 359 (1883); Sawyer v. Skowhegan, 57 Me. 500 (1868); Stewart v. Crosby, 50 Me. 130 (1863); Moore v. Ware, 38 Me. 496 (1854); Johnson v. Candage, 31 Me. 28 (1849).

Perkins v. Inhabitants of Standish

143 Me. 353 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1948

No person shall be employed to teach in any school under the supervision and control of any school board of any city, town or plantation of this state, who does not hold a state certificate as provided for in this chapter … S. 1840, Chap. 17, Secs. 43, 44 and 45 and the following decisions thereunder: Jackson v. Hampden, 20 Me. 37 ; Rolfe v. Cooper, 20 Me. 154 ; Jose v. Moulton, 37 Me. 367 ; Dore v.

Cobb v. Knight

74 Me. 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1882

should be reserved from the insurance fund and held in trust by the widow for her daughter till she should become of age, — that it should then be paid her without interest, the mother meanwhile having the interest and boarding … Benbow v. Townsend, 1 Mylne and Keene, 506. In Jones v. Lock, 1 L. R. Ch. Appeal Cases, 25, Lord Cbakwobth says that "a parol declaration of trust of personalty may be perfectly valid even when voluntary.

Veneer Products Co. v. Ross

127 Me. 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 1929

Banton v. Shorey, 77 Me., 48; Buker v. Bowden, 83 Me., 67; Emerson v. Shores, 95 Me., 237 ; Brown v. Bishop, 105 Me., 272. But the contract right, created by the permit, is not revocable and is subject to breach. … Emerson v. Shores, supra.