Case law

Hawkins v. State

569 P.2d 490 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1977

In the case of Harris v. … In the case of Dickerson v.

Smith v. Griffith

437 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 4, 1977

Plaintiffs assert that notwithstanding the rulings in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … In Summers v. Civis, supra, notice and hearing was claimed pursuant to standards of the North Central Association of College and Secondary Schools adopted by the Board of Education, 3 and in Singleterry v. Ind. Sch.

Opinion No. 80-108 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1980

Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corporation, 198 N.E.2d 483 (1964). … While a board of education is allowed to erect buildings or make improvements on a force account basis, a board may not employ the force account basis to circumvent the mandatory competitive bidding law.

Opinion No. 80-173 (1981) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1981

Board of Commissioners v. Bruce, 51 Okl. 541 , 152 P. 125 (1915), relying in part on Moore v. Nation, 80 Kan. 682 , 103 P. 107 (1909). As explained in Moore v. … The concept expressed by Board of Commissioners v. Bruce and Moore v.

Opinion No. 70-171 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1970

TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM — RETROACTIVE PAYMENTS The Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Teachers' Retirement System can make retroactive payments to one of its members for prior service credit not previously claimed, but … Hedges v.

Hummer v. STATE EX REL. BD. OF AGRICULTURE

245 P.3d 1244 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 2010

Swaim, Plaintiffs, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry; and Land O'Lakes, Inc., Defendant/Appellees. No. 107261. … Cameron v. Corporation Commission, 1966 OK 75 , 414 P.2d 266, 272 . The ALJ's report and recommendations are advisory only and are not binding upon the Board.

Lashley v. Moore

112 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1925

See, also, Alice Strong, 57 Fed. 249 ; Canty v. Latternar (Minn.) 17 N. W. 385 ; Milmo Nat. Bank v. Convery, 8 Tex. Civ. App. 181 , 27 S. W. 828 ; Bell v. Board of Com. of Lake Co. … In Ingersoll v. Coram, 211 U. S. 335 , 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 92, at p. 100, opinion by Mr. Justice McKenna, it is said: “In Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 , 41 L. Ed. 865 , 17 Sup. Ct.

Opinion No. 68-285

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1968

Any action of the committee shall be approved by the Board." … In O'Brien Packing Co. v.

Hobson v. Hall

267 P.2d 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1954

Under such circumstances as held by this court in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okl. 139 , 24 P.2d 295 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the court may in its discretion reverse and remand the cause

Opinion No. 69-115 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1969

Bureau of Indian Affairs, must be classified and supervised by me State Personnel Board. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Opinion No. (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1968

"On the interpretation of statutes we find that in McCain v. … "In Blanset v.

Draper v. State

621 P.2d 1142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1980

See also State v. Daxon, 51 OBJ 544, 607 P.2d 683 (Okl. 1980). . Latting v. Cordell, 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397 (1946). . Swanda v. Swanda, 207 Okl. 186 , 248 P.2d 575 (1952). . McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … Boe v. Gorton, 88 Wash.2d 773 , 567 P.2d 197, 199 (1977). . Wifi v. Wentz, 142 Okl. 128 , 286 P. 796 , 797 (1930). . Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 359 P.2d 183 (Okl.1961); Halliburton v.

State Ex Rel. Reardon, Co. v. Scales

21 Okla. 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1908

Edwards v. … (See, also, Page v. Board of Supervisors, 85 Cal. 50 . 24 Pac. 607 .)

Teeter v. City of Edmond

75 O.B.A.J. 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2004

Robinson v. City of Bartlesville Bd. of Education, supra, Walker v. … See also Bidlingmeyer v.

Opinion No. 79-224 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979

In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.

McKennon v. Winn

1 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1893

(Bishop on Contracts, S. 153; Mallory v. Gillette, 21 N. Y. 412 ; Wyman v. Goodrich, 26 Wis. 21 ; Green v. Brookins, 23 Mich. 48 ; White v. Maynard, 111 Mass. 250 .) … Co. v. O'Laughlin, C. C. A. 49 Fed. Rep. 440.)

BROYLES v. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION

2014 OK CIV APP 53 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 6, 2014

Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Emp't Sec. Comm'n , 1985 OK 21, ¶ 12 , 697 P.2d 533 (quoting Boynton Cab Co. v. … In Siler v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review , 77 P.3d 1002 (Kan. Ct.

Phillips v. Dillingham

44 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

Devault et al. v. Merchants’ Exchange Co., 22 Okla. 624 , 98 Pac. 342 ; Turley v. Hayes & Shirk, 28 Okla. 655 , 115 Pac. 769 ; Bottoms v. Neukirchner et al., 40 Okla. 142 , 136 Pac. 774 ; Brown-Beane Co. v. … Sumner et al. v. Sherwood, 25 Okla. 70 , 105 Pac. 642 ; Tishomingo Electric Light & Power Co. v. Harris, 28 Okla. 10 , 113 Pac. 713 ; State Savings Bank, etc., v. Bedden et ah, 38 Okla. 444 , 134 Pac. 20 ; Malloy v.

Opinion No. 72-181 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972

Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okl., 398 P.2d 827 . … State ex rel Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Company et al, 189 Okl. 629 , 118 P.2d 621 .

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1996

Supp. 1995, § 5-117[ 70-5-117 ], which sets forth the powers and duties of the board of education. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).