Case law

McCormick v. LaChance

32 A.3d 1037 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 2011

landscaped the ten-foot-wide portion of the easement on his side of the boundary line, built a fence alongside the easement, and built a stone wall alongside his driveway. [¶ 14] LaChance appealed McCormick’s permit to the Board … See, e.g., Lyon v. Lea, 84 Me. 254, 257 , 24 A. 844, 845 (1892).

Merrill Trust Co. v. Red Barn, Inc. (In Re Red Barn, Inc.)

23 B.R. 593 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Sep 28, 1982

General Service Employees Union Local No. 73 v. National Labor Relations Board, 578 F.2d 361, 366 (D.C.Cir.1978) (footnotes omitted). … Mesa Farm Co. v. United States (In re Mesa Farm Co.), 475 F.2d 1004, 1007-08 (9th Cir. 1973); see In re Purdy, 16 B.R. 860, 865 (N.D.Ga.1981); see also Udall v.

In Re Dole Company

244 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 1965

Brown Co., 9 Am.Bankr.R.,N.S., 439 (D.Mass.1927); In re Am. Range & Foundry Co., 41 F.2d 845, 847-848 (D.Minn.1926); 3 Collier, op.cit. supra, para. 62.12(4); cf. Klein v. … It is noteworthy that in Finn v.

VK Yarmouth LLC v. McIntyre

Superior Court of Maine · May 18, 2020

E.g., Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, 9, 788 A.2d 168, 170; Thomas v. Thompson, 653 A.2d 417, 419-20 (Me. 1995). … Thomas v.

Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of South Portland

508 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 25, 1986

Brown, Deputy Atty. Gen., Augusta, for Maine Human Rights Comm. Tureen & Margolin, Harold L. Lichten, (orally), Portland, for intervenors, Me. Ass'n of Handicapped Persons and Judy Roberts. William H. … In Percy v.

In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation

575 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 22, 1983

See, e.g., McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 704 F.2d 444 *1378 (9th Cir.1983) (design defects in aircraft ejection system where military had set and approved design specifications); Brown v. … Plaintiffs rely on McCrae v.

HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INC

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 2024

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 821C; see also Brown v. … (quoting Brown, 47 Me. at 164); see also Smedberg v.

Whittemore v. Brooks

1 Me. 57 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 1820

Banks v. Farquarson, 1 Dick 167. Cooper v. Marsden, 1 Esp. 1. Prince v. Blackburn, 2 East. 250. Sluby v. Champlin, 4 Johns. 461 Dudley v. Sumner, 5 Mass. 444 . Homer v. Wallis, 11 Mass. 309 . Cooke v. … Brown, Peake's Ca. 23. 10. Where the deed comes out of the hands of the adverse party, after notice to produce it. Rex v. Middlezoy, 2 D. & E. 41. and cases there cited. Bowles v. Langworthy, 5 D. & E. 366. 11.

Barry v. Austin

118 Me. 51 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1919

Hatch v. Caine, 86 Maine, 282. Other illustrations may be found in Ramsdell v. Ramsdell, 21 Maine, 288; Stuart v. Walker, 72 Maine, 145; Copeland v. Barron, 72 Maine, 206; Small v. Thompson, 92 Maine, 539; Richards v. … Copeland v. Barron, 72 Maine, 206. Those two cases, Stuart v. Walker and Copeland v.

Inhabitants of Whiting v. Inhabitants of Lubec

121 Me. 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1922

Camden v. Camden Vil. Carp., supra; Somerville v. Waltham, supra; Wayland v. County Comm’rs., 4 Gray, 500 ; Worcester County v. Mayor of Worcester, supra; Rochester v. Rush, 80 N. Y., 302 ; Trustees v. Trenton, 30 N. J. … Eq., 667; New Castle Common v. Megginson (Del.), 77 Atl., 565 , An. Cases 1914A, 1207; West Hartford v. Water Comm’rs, 44 Conn., 360 ; People v. DeWitt, 69 N. Y. Sup., 366; People v. Board of Assessors, 111 N.

Equifax Services, Inc. v. Cohen

420 A.2d 189 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1980

See Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New York, - U.S. -, -, 100 S.Ct. 2326, 2331 , 65 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See also Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, 379-82 , 97 S.Ct. 2691, 2706-2708 , 53 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977); Virginia Pharmacy Board, supra, 425 U.S. at 771, n. 24 , 96 S.Ct. at 1830, n. 24 ; Friedman v.

Lombard Water-Wheel Governor Co. v. Great Northern Paper Co.

101 Me. 114 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1906

This delivery was effected in *119 accordance with the terms of the contract by placing the goods on board the cars in Boston. … Torrey v. Corliss, 33 Maine, 333; Wigton v. Bowley, 130 Mass. 252 ; White v. Harvey, 85 Maine, 212.

Roberts v. Richards

84 Me. 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 1891

S., c. 104, § 10; Wyman v. Brown, 50 Maine, 139; Stewart v. … Pray v. Pierce, 7 Mass. 381 ; Coburn v. Hollis, supra; Culver v. Rhodes, 87 N. Y. 348 ; Clark v. Gilbert, 39 Conn. 94 .

Gould v. Hutchins

10 Me. 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1833

Whitmore v. Sanborn, 8 Greenl. 228. … The case of Whitmore v. Sanborn, is an authority directly applicable on this point.

Fairfield v. Paine

23 Me. 498 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1844

In Emerson v. … Whittier v. Varney, 10 N. H.

Whitmore ex rel. Fisher v. Church of the Holy Cross

121 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 9, 1922

In Erhardt v. … Marwick v. Andrews, 25 Maine, 525, at 530; Board of Education v. First Baptist Church, 63 Ill., 204 ; First Presby. Church v. Elliott, 65 S. C., 251.

Allen v. Town of Rockport

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2002

See Cunningham v. Kittery Planning Board, 400 A.2d 1070, 1079 (Me. 1979); compare R. 51 at 584 with R. 51 at 661-62. 4. … and ROCKPORT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS s.

United States v. Feliz

20 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 10, 1998

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). … As such, the principles set forth in Wong Sun and Brown are applicable.

Woodman v. Freeman

25 Me. 531 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1846

should become parties to it as purchasers, on condition, that there should be found on examination or exploration, as it was called, a standing growth of pine timber sufficient to make seven thousand feet of merchantable boards … Bacon v. Brown, 7 Johns. Ch. R. 194.

Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

844 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1994

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), held that “the Sherman Act does not apply ‘to the anticompetitive conduct of a State acting through its legislature.’ ” 324 Liquor Corp. v. … See Mahaney v.