Case law

Thomas v. Brown

145 A.D.2d 849 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 1988

It is true that where a dispute exists as to the designation of a boundary, the intent of the parties should control (see, Pauquette v Ray, 58 AD2d 950, 951 ). … However, this resulted in the preference of an artificial object over a natural object (see, Pauquette v Ray, supra; 1 NY Jur 2d, Adjoining Landowners, § 115, at 611).

Brown v. Meyer

33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 207 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1990

In Strake , the chairman of the Republican Party of Texas refused to accept Senator Brown’s application to be a candidate in the primary race for Attorney General in 1986 because he had held legislative office when an across-the-board … As we noted in Spears v.

Brown v. State

349 So. 2d 1196 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 12, 1977

BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 76-942. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 12, 1977. Rehearing Denied October 4, 1977. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. … See, e.g., Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139 , 82 S.Ct. 1218 , 8 L.Ed.2d 384 (1962); United States v. Hearst, 412 F. Supp. 888 (N.D.Cal. 1976); People v. Miller, 252 Cal. App.2d 877 , 60 Cal. Rptr. 791 (1967).

Smith v. Brown

302 Mass. 432 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 1, 1939

Ed.] c. 231, § 85; Sooserian v. … In Clarke v.

Kirkman v. Brown

93 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1894

Brown. … Jo' Brown. If the possession *481 was accidental, and not by design, tbe statute does not apply. Gates v. Butler, 3 Hum., 447 ; 2 Swan, 31 ; 1 Cold., 502 .

Brown v. Campbell

110 Cal. 644 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1895

The case of Priest v. Brown et al., in which Joseph Brown and A. M. … (Priest v. Brown, 100 Cal. 626 ; Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 ; 38 Am. St. Rep. 314 .)

Brown v. Corbin

40 Minn. 508 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 24, 1889

St. 1878, c. 11, § 85; Eastman v. Linn, 26 Minn. 215 ; Chauncey v. Wass, 35 Minn. 1 , ( 25 N. W. Rep. 457 , and 30 N. W. Rep. 826 .) 4. … Weimer v. Porter, 42 Mich. 569 , ( 4 N. W. Rep. 306 ;) Miller v. Hurford, 13 Neb. 13 , ( 12 N. W. Rep. 832 .) Order affirmed. Gilfillan, C. J., being absent because of illness, took no part in this case.

Brown v. State

649 S.W.2d 160 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1983

Banks v. State, 510 S.W.2d 592, 595 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); see also Darrington v. State, 623 S.W.2d 414 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Rohlfing v. State, 612 S.W.2d 598 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). … Myre v. State, 545 S.W.2d 820, 827 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Cunningham v. State, 500 S.W.2d 820, 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); see also, Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 , 92 S.Ct. 1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972); Harrington v.

State v. Brown

273 Conn. 330 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Apr 12, 2005

State v. King, supra, 249 Conn. 678 ; accord State v. … In State v.

Brown v. Childers

254 S.W.2d 275 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1953

In Hessel v. … In Richards v.

Brown v. State

222 Md. 290 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 14, 1960

“In State v. … In Callan v.

Waters v. Brown

44 Mo. 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1869

(Douglass v. Stephens, 18 Mo. 362 .)

Brown v. Olmsted

50 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

(Griffith v. Grogan, 12 Cal. 320 ; Welch v. Allington, 23 Cal. 322 ; Brewster v. Bours, 8 Cal. 506 .) We think it unnecessary to discuss other points made by the appellant. We find no error in the record.

People v. Brown

925 N.W.2d 845 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2019

Richards v. Brown

642 Utah Adv. Rep. 25 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Oct 29, 2009

Parker v. … Haupt v.

State v. Brown

199 Conn. 14 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 4, 1986

State v. … His true name is Judson Brown. General Statutes (Rev. to 1977) § 53a-112 (a) provides: “Sec. 53a-112.

People v. Brown

2019 NY Slip Op 8746 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 2019

People v Brown ( 2019 NY Slip Op 08746 ) People v Brown 2019 NY Slip Op 08746 Decided on December 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … The conviction was affirmed upon appeal ( People v Brown , 232 AD3d 750 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 940 [1997]).

Brown v. Dewey

2 Barb. 28 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1847

(Robinson v. Cropsey, 6 Paige, 480 . Holmes v. Grant, 8 Id. 257.) If there is gross inadequacy of price, it is always a strong circumstance to show that the parties did not intend a sale. … With the exception of the fact that a part of the consideration was paid by surrendering securities already held by the defendant, this case is not distinguishable from that of Glover v. Payn, ( 19 Wend. 518 .)

Brown v. Persons

48 Ga. 60 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 15, 1873

Brown v. State

269 So. 3d 517 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 15, 2019