Case law

Maddox v. Brown

233 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 1951

Both vehicles,— the motorcycle ridden by the intestate and the bus driven by the defendant Brown, — were traveling westerly toward Gastonia. … See Maddox v. Brown, supra ( 232 N.C. 542 , pp. 544 and 545).

Brown v. Marks

45 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

Harrison v. Penny, 28 Okla. 523 , 114 Pac. 734 ; Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. State Nat. Bank, 25 Okla. 128 , 105 Pac. 647 ; First Nat. Bank v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383 , 108 Pac. 748 ; Cooper v. … Laws 1910, sec. 5244; Upton v. Am. Trust Co., 31 Okla. 456 , 122 Pac. 159 ; Ripey v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 ; Hess v. Harrah v, 28 Okla. 627 , 115 Pac. 790 ; Harrison v.

People v. Brown

924 N.W.2d 582 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2019

Brown v. Storm

4 Vt. 37 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1831

Storm having recovered in an action of ejectment against Brown, the latter has filed this declaration for betterments under the statute. … Harvill, supposed he purchased a title in fee : but if Dewey only purchased of Harvill his right under the contract which Harvill made with Storm, Brown cannot recover for those improvements ; — and that Brown cannot recover

Brown v. State

128 Fla. 762 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 1, 1937

Brown, J., dissents. Mr. Justice Davis concurred in the foregoing opinion.

Brown v. Bell

58 Mich. 58 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1885

On the 5th of April, 1857, Thomas Brown of Greenfield in the county of Wayne, made his last will, by the provisions of which he gave to his wife all his estate, both real and personal, for and during her life, with remainder … Brown, the proponent in this case, to whom he gave immediate possession of all the property.

Brown v. Burrow

171 Minn. 219 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 6, 1927

The plaintiff Ida Brown claimed that, as she was walking across Sixth street going north on the westerly side of Sibley street in St. … In Storhaugen v.

Brown v. State

198 Ark. 920 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1939

In the case of Spurgeon v. State, 160 Ark. 112 , 254 S. … Dewein v. State, 114 Ark. 472 , 170 S. W. 582 .”

Brown v. Tourtelotte

24 Colo. 204 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 15, 1897

To the same effect is the case of Lackland v. Smith, 75 Mo. 307 ; while in the subsequent case of Board of Trade v. … However, in its general features we think it is more like the case of Board of Trade v.

Poff v. Brown

374 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 2008

Southern Farmers Ass’n v. Wyatt, 234 Ark. 649, 653 , 333 S.W.2d 531, 533 (1962); see also Clark v. … Wilson v. Brown, 320 Ark. 240 , 897 S.W.2d 546 (1995); Batesville Truck Lines, Inc. v. Martin, 219 Ark. 603 , 243 S.W.2d 729 (1951). Courts of equity are careful to deny any person the advantage of his or her own wrong.

James v. Brown

11 Mich. 25 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1862

Brown’s testimony is the only evidence bearing directly on this question. It becomes necessary therefore to examine closely. … We have been thus particular in scanning Brown’s testimony, as the defense may be said to turn on the view taken of it.

State v. Brown

130 Wash. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 13, 2005

Brown asserts that the state constitution prohibits the challenged jury instruction language. ¶9 In State v. … Here, *771 Brown argues that the language of the “to convict” instruction affirmatively misleads the jury about its power to acquit. Brown points to the jury’s power to acquit against the evidence, citing to Hartigan v.

Brown v. State

561 S.W.2d 484 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 1, 1978

On April 20, 1975, I talked to Zelma Strader and she stated to me that James David Brown had nothing to do with the death of his wife, Linda Faye Brown.” No hearing was ever held on this motion. … Browning v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 85 ; Watkins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d 819 ; Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 459 S.W.2d 845 .

Hahn v. Brown

51 Ohio App. 2d 177 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1976

Brown v. Baldwin

131 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1994

Defendant responds that, although certain previous decisions, including Fine v. Zenon, 114 Or App 183 , 834 P2d 509 (1992), might support petitioner’s position, those decisions were implicitly overruled by Bartz v. … Bartz v. State of Oregon, supra, 314 Or at 358 , adopts the same construction.

Priest v. Brown

100 Cal. 626 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1893

(Dana v. Stanford, 10 Cal. 269 ; Low v. Wortman, 44 N. J. Eq. 202; Shelley v. Boothe, 73 Mo. 74 ; 39 Am. Rep. 481 ; Brashear v. West, 7 Pet. 614 ; Giddings v. Sears, 115 Mass. 505 .) … In Gregory v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

201 A.3d 732 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2019

Allen v. Brown

39 Iowa 330 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 25, 1874

S. v. Kirkpatrick, 9. Wheat., 720. Iowa v. U. S., 7. How., 681. See also 1 Am. Leading Cases, 299. Notice to Mayor v. Patten; Allen v. Culen, 3 Denio, 293 . Fairchild et al. v. Hawley et al., 10 Conn., 176 .

Brown v. McBride

129 Ga. 92 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 12, 1907

See, in this connection, Proctor v. Pointer, 137 Ga. 134 , 56 S. E. 111 ; Slaughter v. Heath, 127 Ga. 748 (6), 57 S. E. 69 . 3. … Brown, the caveator, requesting Brown to pay certain amounts of money to certain parties designated as creditors of the estate of Y. A. Clegg, the testator.

Furniss v. Brown

8 How. Pr. 59 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1853

In all of Brown’s letters he recognizes Furniss’s joint ownership. … The motion by Brown for the injunction must, of course, under the view of the case, be denied with costs. Furniss agt. Brown. DECISION. 1.