Case law

Rose v. Osborne

133 Me. 497 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1935

Allen, Admr. v. Polereczky, 31 Me., 338; Dole v. Lincoln, 31 Me., 422; Northrop v. Hale, 73 Me., 66; Drew v. Hagerty, 81 Me., 231; Augusta Savings Bank v. Fogg, Exr. et al., 82 Me., 538; Norway Savings Bank v. … Merriam, et als., 88 Me., 146; Fairfield Savings Bank v. Small, 90 Me., 546; Getchell v. Biddeford Savings Bank, 94 Me., 452; Hallowell Savings Institution v. Titcomb, Exr. et al., 96 Me., 62; Brown v.

Gray v. Gray

609 A.2d 694 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1992

Mary Ann, an executive at UNUM, provided guidance and acted as a sounding board for ideas in the development of the new ventures. … Jacobs v. Jacobs, 507 A.2d 596, 600 (Me.1986).

State v. Rand

366 A.2d 183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1976

Bussey v. … The Board left it to the Department to initiate inter-pleader proceedings to resolve the ownership dispute. 2 .

Dinkel v. General Motors Corp.

400 F. Supp. 2d 289 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 9, 2005

See also Berry v. Am. … I recognize that my conclusion differs from that of Brown v.

Ezekiel v. Astrue

853 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2012

In Rodriquez v. … He refers to a letter he filed with the Decision Review Board on May 4, 2009.

Norton v. Heckler

612 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 18, 1985

concluded that Section 4 should be applied by the Court in its “determinations” on review of decisions of the Secretary which were made before the effective date of the Act, based on the statute’s broad language, on Bradley v. … Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), and on the fact that no manifest injustice would result. Boisvert v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 84-0292-P (D.Me.

Kenneth W. Ross v. Acadian Seaplants, LTD.

206 A.3d 283 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2019

McGarvey v. … Moore v.

Fotter v. Butler

145 Me. 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1950

Atherton v. Crandlemire et al., 140 Me. 28 , 33 A, (2nd) 303 (1943); Bragdon v. Kellogg, 118 Me. 42 , 105 A. 433 , 6 A. L. R. 669 (1919). … As said in Cayford v.

Warren v. Blake

54 Me. 276 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

This case of Pyer v. Carter has been very recently, not merely doubted, but denied by the Chancellor of England, in the case of Suffield v. Brown, reported in 10 Jurist, (N. S.,) part 1, p. 111. … Nichols v. Luce, 24 Pick., 102 ; Johnson v. Jordan, 2 Met., 234 ; Thayer v. Paine, 2 Cush., 327 ; Casberry v. Willis, 7 Allen, 364 ; Randall v. McLaughlin, 10 Allen, 366 .

Merrill v. Inhabitants of Harpswell

120 Me. 25 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1921

Island to Bailey’s Island, which plans and, specifications were used by the selectmen in connection with the advertising for bids for construction, 'which bids were opened on December 13, 1913, in the presence of the entire Board … Inhabitants of Wells v. County Commissioner, 79 Maine, 522.

Frustaci v. City of South Portland

879 A.2d 1001 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 25, 2005

See Blanchard v. … See, e.g., Finks v. Me.

Casey v. Sch. Union 106

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 5, 2000

The law in Maine “deliberately leaves the decision whether to review a probationary teaching contract to the unfettered discretion of the school board.” Marxsen v. … See Annable v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 507 A.2d 592, 594 (Me. 1986). The entry is The Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

State of Maine v. David L. Sullivan

181 A.3d 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2018

United States v. Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 64 (1st Cir. 2007). 2. … State v.

Scammon v. Cole

21 F. Cas. 627 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Sep 15, 1871

Hill v. Simpson, 7 Ves. 152; Kennedy v. Green, 3 Mylne & K. 722; Smith v. Low, 1 Atk. 489; 3 Sugd. Vend. 471; Jones v. Smith, 1 Hare, 43; Pringle v. Phillips, 5 Sandf. 157 ; Booth v. Barnum, 9 Conn. 286 ; Pitney v. … Hawley v. Cramer, 4 Cow. 717 ; Williamson v. Brown, 20 Law Rep. 397 .

McDonough v. Normand M. Methot Insurance, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 26, 2016

Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 ME 75, ,r 40, 118 A.3d 789 (citation omitted) (quotation marks omitted). … Brown, 2015 ME 75, ~ 29, 118 A.3d 789. Summary judgment is inappropriate on this basis. D.

Karbiner v. Montgomery

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 29, 2011

Wanda Haddock filed a Petition for Review under Rule 80B to review the most recent Board of Appeals decision on April 14, 2010 upholding a Planning Board denial of Ms. Haddock's most recent building permit request. … This Court entered its Order and Judgment in Wanda Haddock v.

Town of Hancock v. PCJ, LLC and Bridgetwin, LLC

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2020

Thereafter, the Planning Board asked for additional information several different times. PCJ representatives attended several Planning Board meetings between April 2016 and September 2016. … The new ordinance did not address any process for any applications then pending before the Planning Board.

Stone v. Northeast Publ'g Co.

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2003

Jd, At that meeting, the plaintiff advised his supervisor, J ohn Browning, that he thought the defendant’s failure to make full payments of the commissions was illegal. POSMF { 15 (citing Browning deposition at p. 48). … Browning notified his own supervisor, Pam Lynch, of this accusation. DSMF { 15. The next day, Browning, Lynch and the plaintiff met. Zd., 16.

Daggett v. Devine

973 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 18, 1997

I am aware that in Thorsted v. … In this respect, the case is unlike Buckley v.

Wainwright v. County of Oxford

369 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 21, 2005

De-Jesus-Adorno v. Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat'l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … FDIC v. Anchor Props., 13 F.3d 27, 30 (1st Cir.1994) (citing Darr v. Muratore, 8 F.3d 854, 859 (1st Cir.1993)). III.