Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.69s

  • Lawrence v. . Brown

    5 N.Y. 394 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1851

    In Lawrence v. Miller ( 2 N. … (Ni ckells v. Atherstone, 10 Ad. & E. (N. S.) 944; Dodd v. Acklom, 6 Man. & Gr. 673, 679.)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Briggs

    1 How. Pr. 152 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1845

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cook

    123 Utah 505 · Utah Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1953

    Brown, her present husband, and then returned to Utah to get the child and commenced these proceedings after defendants refused to surrender him to her. … In Smythe v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    81 Miss. 143 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1902

    In Webb v. … To the same effect are the following cases: Houston v. State, 38 Ga., 165 ; State v. Rand, 33 N. H., at p. 227; Markham v. State, 25 Ga., 52 . Counsel misconceives James v. State, 77 Miss., 372 ; 26 So., 929 ; 78 Am.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Williams

    196 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1928

    Miller v. Lash, 85 N. C., 51 ; Laurence v. Hester, 93 N. C., 79 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 ; Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 ; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312 ; Fertilizer Co. v. Eason, 194 N. C., 244 . 2. … Bailey v. Rutjes, 86 N. C., at p. 520-1; Blount v. Guthrie, 99 N. C., 93 ; Dorsett v. Dorsett, 183 N. C., 354 . See Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., at p. 397; Dorsey v. Corbett, 190 N. C., at p. 788.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    458 S.W.2d 192 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 8, 1970

    The judgment making final the judgment nisi entered in Cause No. 3079 in the 31st District Court of Wheeler County, and adjudging that the State of Texas recover from the principal, William Robert Brown, and in like manner … United Bonding Insurance Company, as surety, the sum of $10,000.00 and all costs of suit; that *193 the execution issue and that the judgment draw interest at the rate of six percent from date, for the reasons set forth in Brown

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Meyer

    33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 207 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1990

    In Strake , the chairman of the Republican Party of Texas refused to accept Senator Brown’s application to be a candidate in the primary race for Attorney General in 1986 because he had held legislative office when an across-the-board … As we noted in Spears v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Clem v. Brown

    3 Ohio Misc. 167 · Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · May 14, 1965

    Flandermeyer v. Cooper (1912), 85 Ohio St., 327 ; Smith v. Nicholas Bldg. Co. (1915), 93 Ohio St. 101 ; Kelly v. Bouche (1941), 21 Ohio Ops. 244 , 6 Ohio Supp. 327 . … Co. v. Jones, 21 Colo. 340 , 40 Pac. 891 .” In Sheard v. Oregon Electric Ry.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Quinn

    406 Mass. 641 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 14, 1990

    We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review, see Brown v. Quinn, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 288 (1989), to examine the propriety of the dismissal of a draft report pursuant to Dist. Mun. Cts. R. Civ. … Director of the Div. of Employment Sec., 391 Mass. 403 (1984) (late ser *644 vice); Pierce v. Board of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804 (1976) (same); Gilmore v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Campbell

    110 Cal. 644 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1895

    The case of Priest v. Brown et al., in which Joseph Brown and A. M. … (Priest v. Brown, 100 Cal. 626 ; Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 ; 38 Am. St. Rep. 314 .)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Corbin

    40 Minn. 508 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 24, 1889

    St. 1878, c. 11, § 85; Eastman v. Linn, 26 Minn. 215 ; Chauncey v. Wass, 35 Minn. 1 , ( 25 N. W. Rep. 457 , and 30 N. W. Rep. 826 .) 4. … Weimer v. Porter, 42 Mich. 569 , ( 4 N. W. Rep. 306 ;) Miller v. Hurford, 13 Neb. 13 , ( 12 N. W. Rep. 832 .) Order affirmed. Gilfillan, C. J., being absent because of illness, took no part in this case.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Turner v. Brown

    7 Tex. 489 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1852

    . — Henderson v. Kissam, S T., 46; Greenwood v. Anderson, 8 T., 225; Pridgin v. Strickland, 8 T.,427; Bell v. McDonald, 9 T., 378; Tousey v. Butler, 9 T.,525; Tryon v. Butler, 9 T.,653; Williams v. … Randon, ID T., 74; Kinney v. Lee, 10 T., 155; Pridgen v. McLean, 12 T., 420; Whitehead v. Herron, 15 T., 127; Hopkins v. Wright, 17 T., 30; Chapman v. Sneed, 17 T„ 428; Thouve-nin v. Lea, 20 T., 012; Usher v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    200 A.3d 941 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    200 A.3d 942 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Harley

    2 Fla. 159 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1848

    Harley on the said 21st November, 1842, by the consideration of said Court recovered against one David Brown a judgment for,” &c.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    38 A.D.3d 676 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 2007

    Smith, 23 AD3d 416, 417 [2005]; People v Freeman, 305 AD2d 331 [2003]; People v Gatling, 222 AD2d 606 [1995]). … Hurley, 75 NY2d 887, 888 [1990]; People v Chapero, 23 AD3d 492, 493 [2005]).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Childers

    254 S.W.2d 275 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1953

    In Hessel v. … In Richards v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    222 Md. 290 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 14, 1960

    “In State v. … In Callan v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    348 N.W.2d 743 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 18, 1984

    See, e.g., State v. … Recently, in Escobedo v.

    Abrogated in part, on other grounds by State v. Ramey, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 626 (2006)Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McCurdy

    278 Pa. 19 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1923

    Brown then, made nursing necessary, and this service was performed, in addition, while the latter lived. … The mere fact that the claimant was a daughter-in-law of the decedent raises no presumption of gratuitous service (Schoch v. Garrett, 69 Pa. 144 ; Gerz v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.