Case law

Evensizer v. Board of Parole

301 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1986

Like the petitioners in Price v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 393 , 723 P2d 314 (1986), and Martz v. … Board of Parole, 301 Or 400 , 723 P2d 317 (1986), this petitioner argues that the Board of Parole (Board) abused its discretion in setting her initial date of release on parole.

Tompkins v. District Boundary Board

180 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1947

In Hargis v. Board of Commissioners, 165 Ind. 194 , 73 N. … board.

Crouse v. Workmen's Compensation Board

26 Or. App. 849 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 20, 1976

The rule is valid if it is within the legislative delegation of authority, Angelos v. Bd. of Dental Examiners, 244 Or 1 , 414 P2d 335 (1966); Ore. Newspaper Publ. v. … The legislative purpose is to facilitate the employment of disabled persons and the Board has authority to regulate to that end. Harry & David v. Work. Comp. Bd., 6 Or App 566 , 488 P2d 829 (1971).

Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board

270 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2015

See McKay v. … See Villanueva v.

Brown v. Medo Land Creamery Co.

240 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1965

On the authority of Suetter v. A. E. Kern & Co., 1934, 146 Or 96, 109 , 29 P2d 534, 539 , the trial court dismissed this action. … fraudulently conceals any prop *627 erty from the creditors or the trustee, until after his discharge, he may not thereafter assert any claim to or arising out of such concealed property: First National Bank of Jacksboro v.

Guzman v. Board of Parole

346 Or. App. 784 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2026

See Brown v. … (emphasis in Brown), meaning “the sentence imposed by the sentencing court * * * represents the actual amount of time that an offender” will serve, subject to “certain reductions allowed by law,” State v.

State Land Board v. Schwabe

240 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1965

State Land Board v. Pekarek, 1963, 234 Or 74 , 378 P2d 734 . … In State Land Board v.

Schade v. State Board

94 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

On the basis of that report, the Board ordered no change in petitioner’s release date. Petitioner seeks review of the Board’s order. We affirm. … Accordingly, the Board did not err in issuing its order. Affirmed.

State Land Board v. Pekarek

234 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1963

We are then reminded that in State v. … E.g., Standard Oil Co. v. New Jersey, 341 US 428 , 71 S Ct 822 , 95 L Ed 1078 (1951); Security Bank v. California, 263 US 282 , 44 *78 S Ct 108, 68 L Ed 301 , 31 ALR 391 (1923); State v. First Nat.

Mullart v. State Land Board

222 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1960

Garvin v. Western Cooperage Co., 94 Or 487, 497 , 184 P 555 (1919); Carfa v. Albright, 39 Wash2d 697, 237 P2d 795, 797 , 31 ALR2d 983 (1951); 5 Wigmore, Evidence (3d ed) 298, §1483. … Clark v. Allen, 331 US 503, 517 , 91 L ed 1633, 1645, 67 S Ct 1431 . We, therefore, hold: 1.

Johnson v. Civil Service Board

162 Or. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1999

Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. … Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 506 , 985 P2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner

Nakashima v. Board of Education

204 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

In Montgomery v. … Neither OSAA nor the board has opposed the motion. . We have allowed the motion to intervene. In Barendrecht v.

Davis v. Board of Parole

200 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2005

Board of Pardons v. … Hamel v.

Hettle v. Construction Contractors Board

260 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 2013

See Shin v. … See Conway v.

Nakashima v. Board of Education

206 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2006

To begin with, we addressed — and rejected — it in Montgomery v. Board of Education, 188 Or App 63, 71-77 , 71 P3d 94 (2003). … See, e.g., Kinross Copper Corp. v.

Lewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole

329 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

Like the petitioners in two other cases decided today, Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, ___ P3d ___ (2023), and Watson v. … The petitioner in Watson did not raise the issue to the board, but, relying on Tuckenberry v.

Robertson v. State Land Board

42 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1902

of Supervisors v. … In McIntire v. Wood, 11 U.

Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board

344 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2025

In March 2021, following briefing, we affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 309 Or App 596, 481 P3d 313, rev den, 368 Or 637 (2021). … Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 368 Or 637, 496 P3d 630 (2021). That brings us directly to the new case before us.

Murphy v. Board of Parole

241 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2011

v. … failed to challenge an alternate ground for the board's decision); Maimon v.

Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

248 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1967

The plaintiff Viola V. … Brown v. Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., 234 F2d 204, 206 (5th cir, 1956).