Case law

Williamson v. State Election Board

431 P.2d 352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1967

Cloud v. … See Sparks v. State Election Board, Okl., 392 P.2d 711 .

Brown v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

73 O.B.A.J. 3315 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 2002

Jackson v. … Co. v.

Baggett v. State Election Board

501 P.2d 817 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1972

See Wagoner County Election Board v. Plunkett, Okl., 305 P.2d 525 . … Brown (1921), 82 Okl. 227 , 200 P. 156 , wherein Goar brought an action in the .Superior Court of Pottawatomie County to cancel an election certificate which had been issued by the county election board certifying that Brown

Board of Ed. v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County

140 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1929

In Board of Ed. of Sapulpa v. … It was held in Board of Education, City of Sapulpa, v.

Brown v. B & D LAND CO.

823 P.2d 380 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1991

Brown, appeals the trial court’s judgment for defendant, B & D Land Company, following a non-jury trial. Plaintiff purchased a twelve-acre tract on which to build a house and barn from defendant on November 9, 1984. … Tulsa Orthopaedic Associates, 566 P.2d 429 (Okla.1977), and Onstott v. Osborne, 417 P.2d 291 (Okla.1966).

General American Life Ins. Co. v. Brown

176 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1936

Brown as purchaser and beneficiary, sued the defendant on, a certain policy of life insurance issued by the defendant’s predecessor on the life of his son, George R. (Brown. … Brown, as insured; Charles J. Brown, as beneficiary, and Missouri State Life Insurance Company, as the company.

Brown v. State

22 Okla. Crim. 393 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1923

On September 5, 1919, defendant, Eddie Brown, was by information charged with selling intoxicating liquor to L. B. White, in the Kingkade Hotel in Oklahoma City on September 4, 1919. … Brown v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 567 , 115 Pac. 615 , cited with approval in State v. Ling, 91 Kan. 650 , 138 Pac. 582 , Ann. Cas. 1915D, 374; 22 Cyc. 275.

Johnson v. Brown

77 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1919

In this court counsel for the Browns say in their brief that, “in the light of the recent case of Parker v. … J., RAINEY, V. C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Chickasha Packing Company v. Brown

372 P.2d 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1962

Claimant cites and relies upon Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas and Electric Co., 49 Okl. 304 , 152 P. 82 , L.R.A.1916B, 910; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Lenahan, 68 Okl. 73 , 171 P. 455 ; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. … Lenahan, 85 Okl. 290 , 206 P. 233 ; Atlas Assurance Co. of London v. Fairchild, 171 Okl. 609 , 43 P.2d 482 ; Crisp v. Nunn, 173 Okl. 203 , 47 P.2d 139 ; American National Bank of Enid v.

Thompson v. Brown

45 Okla. 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Putnam et al. v. Western Bank Supply Co., 38 Okla. 152 , 132 Pac. 483 ; Cable v. Myers, 43 Okla. 302 , 142 Pac. 1114 . The case is therefore dismissed. All the Justices concur, except KANE, C.

Today Homes, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Brown)

267 B.R. 877 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 1, 2001

See Spilka v. … See also, Stratton v.

First National Bank of Guthrie v. Brown

579 P.2d 825 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1978

Brown when policies he had initially sold were renewed. Ultimately, Mr. Brown defaulted on both notes, leaving an unpaid balance of approximately $8,000.00. Mr. … Brown and the Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company, seeking to enforce their assignment, which entitled them to future renewal commissions payable to Mr. Brown from Pennsylvania Life. Both Mr.

Brown v. Stogsdale

42 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1913

Brown pray that they may be ordered to pay to said Joe D. … And in Cornwell et al. v.

Rees v. Brown

186 Okla. 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1940

This action upon a demand note was commenced in a justice of the peace court of Oklahoma county by Cecil Brown, as plaintiff, against W. E. Rees, as defendant. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Dees v. Brown

106 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

Brown for possession, cancellation of the deeds, and to quiet' title. January 7, 1919, the defendant, Eli W. Brown, died, and the cause was, thereafter, revived in the name of W. N. Brown, as the administrator. … This question is determined and settled in favor of the contention of the plaintiff in error and against the defendant in error in the cases of Criner v. Farve et al., 44 Okla. 618 , 146 Pac. 10 , and Blackwell v.

Brown v. State

16 Okla. Crim. 727 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1919

Plaintiff in error, Morris Brown, and Tom Mundy were jointly informed against, and tried upon an information charging that in Muskogee county on or about the 21st day of August, 1916, they did knowingly and unlawfully have … The question presented was passed upon at this term in the case of Pate v. Smith, 15 Okla.

Johnston v. Board of Education

194 Okla. 150 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1944

Board of Education of City of Duncan v. Johnston, 189 Okla. 172 , 115 P. 2d 132 ; Wilson v. City of Hollis ex rel. Armstrong, 193 Okla. 241 , 142 P. 2d 633 . … That statement was considered to some extent in Board of Education v. Johnston, supra.

Swindall v. State Election Board

96 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1923

This is an action to enjoin the State Election Board from placing .the name of the defendant in error, Garber, on the official ballot as a candidate for Congress in the general election held in November, 1922. … After the dismissial of the action in the court below, no action was taken to restrain the election board or to prevent it from placing the name of the defendant in error on the official ballot as a candidate for Congress

Girdner v. Board of Commissioners

227 P.3d 1111 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 2009

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 . A motion to dismiss cannot be sustained "unless it should appear without doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim for relief" Miller v. … Cruse v. Board of County Commissionmers of Atoka County, 1995 OK 143, ¶¶ 16-18 , 910 P.2d 998, 1004-1005 .

State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. State Board of Education

287 P.2d 704 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1955

In Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … V, § 55 of the Oklahoma Constitution in cases involving a similar question. In Fortinberry Co. v.