Case law

Ronald White v. Real Deal Auto Sales & Service Center, LLC

2024 ME 18 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2024

v. … .”); Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Bickford, 2017 ME 140, ¶ 9, 166 A.3d 986 (“Legal issues do not include questions of weight to be given to evidence.”); Cote v.

Waldoboro Bank v. American Casualty Co.

775 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 11, 1991

See also Harris v. Resolution Trust Corp., 939 F.2d 926, 929 (11th Cir.1991). … See also § 545.121(f); Atlantic Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association v.

Rouillard v. Tardiff (In Re Tardiff)

38 B.R. 974 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · May 1, 1984

Since his divorce the debtor has lived in a number of apartments, boarding homes and motels. While he has on occasion been interested in purchasing a home, he has not been able to afford a down payment. … Braddock v. McBurnie, 152 Me. 39, 41 , 122 A.2d 319 (1956) (citing Smith v. Diplock, 127 Me. 452 , 144 A. 383 (1929)).

United States v. Holmes

26 F. Cas. 349 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Sep 15, 1858

He. also testified that a man by the name of Furlong was a seaman on board the ship. … Reg. v. Stokes, 3 Car. & K. 185; Reg. v. Allnut, and Reg. v. Pate. 1 Ben. & H. Lead. Cas. 95, 96.

Jortner v. Bellows

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 9, 2023

held that § 905(2) mandates that the Superior Court "independently determine whether the ballot question is understandable and not misleading" based on the record, without deference to the Secretary's decision. 2 Olson v. … Olson v. Sec'y of State, 1997 ME 30, 'I[ 6, 689 A.2d 605; see Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 3, § 20. Page3 of 6 III.

Rose v. Osborne

133 Me. 497 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1935

Allen, Admr. v. Polereczky, 31 Me., 338; Dole v. Lincoln, 31 Me., 422; Northrop v. Hale, 73 Me., 66; Drew v. Hagerty, 81 Me., 231; Augusta Savings Bank v. Fogg, Exr. et al., 82 Me., 538; Norway Savings Bank v. … Merriam, et als., 88 Me., 146; Fairfield Savings Bank v. Small, 90 Me., 546; Getchell v. Biddeford Savings Bank, 94 Me., 452; Hallowell Savings Institution v. Titcomb, Exr. et al., 96 Me., 62; Brown v.

State v. Hebert

480 A.2d 742 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 1984

V. … See State v.

Maine Human Rights Commission v. Local 1361, United Paperworkers International Union AFL-CIO

383 A.2d 369 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 1978

Cooper v. General Dynamics, Convair Aerospace Division, Fort Worth Operation, 533 F.2d 163, 172 (5th Cir. 1976), (Brown, C. … We, therefore, find persuasive Chief Judge Brown’s reasoning: [Rjeason argues overwhelmingly that in the structure of this statute Congress could not have thought that for two parties under the same stringent substantive

Rhodes v. Segee Realty, LLC

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 19, 2019

Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 ME 75,, 9, 118 A.sd 789. … See Brown v.

Norton v. Heckler

612 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 18, 1985

concluded that Section 4 should be applied by the Court in its “determinations” on review of decisions of the Secretary which were made before the effective date of the Act, based on the statute’s broad language, on Bradley v. … Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), and on the fact that no manifest injustice would result. Boisvert v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 84-0292-P (D.Me.

Ezekiel v. Astrue

853 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2012

In Rodriquez v. … He refers to a letter he filed with the Decision Review Board on May 4, 2009.

Fotter v. Butler

145 Me. 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1950

Atherton v. Crandlemire et al., 140 Me. 28 , 33 A, (2nd) 303 (1943); Bragdon v. Kellogg, 118 Me. 42 , 105 A. 433 , 6 A. L. R. 669 (1919). … As said in Cayford v.

Kenneth W. Ross v. Acadian Seaplants, LTD.

206 A.3d 283 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2019

McGarvey v. … Moore v.

Mottram v. Murch

330 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 5, 1971

a petition for post-conviction habeas corpus relief under the provisions of 14 M.R.S.A. § 5502 et seq. challenging the procedures followed by the Parole Board in revoking his parole. … Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 67 , 88 S.Ct. 1549 , 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968); Desmond v. United States Board of Parole, 397 F.2d 386, 389 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 919 , 89 S.Ct. 249 , 21 L.Ed.2d 206 (1968).

Merrill v. Inhabitants of Harpswell

120 Me. 25 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1921

Island to Bailey’s Island, which plans and, specifications were used by the selectmen in connection with the advertising for bids for construction, 'which bids were opened on December 13, 1913, in the presence of the entire Board … Inhabitants of Wells v. County Commissioner, 79 Maine, 522.

Rauch v. Town of Kittery

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 21, 2004

See Juliano v. Town of Poland, 1999 ME 42, 47, 725 A.2d 545, 8. There was no request for a permit with more generous conditions nor any challenge to the permit as issued. … The Board was correct in its findings and decision. The Board is also correct for a somewhat more complex reason.

Casey v. Sch. Union 106

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 5, 2000

The law in Maine “deliberately leaves the decision whether to review a probationary teaching contract to the unfettered discretion of the school board.” Marxsen v. … See Annable v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 507 A.2d 592, 594 (Me. 1986). The entry is The Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Dow v. Caribou Chamber of Commerce

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 9, 2005

P. 56(c); see also Darlings v. Ford Motor Co., 2003 ME 21, § 14, 817 A.2d 877, 879. … Rodrigue v. Rodrigue, 1997 ME 99, J 8, 694 A.2d 924, 926. “‘A fact is material when it has the potential to affect the outcome of the suit.’” Prescott v. State Tax Assessor, 1998 ME 250, 45, 721 A.2d 169, 172.

State of Maine v. David L. Sullivan

181 A.3d 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2018

United States v. Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 64 (1st Cir. 2007). 2. … State v.

Scammon v. Cole

21 F. Cas. 627 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Sep 15, 1871

Hill v. Simpson, 7 Ves. 152; Kennedy v. Green, 3 Mylne & K. 722; Smith v. Low, 1 Atk. 489; 3 Sugd. Vend. 471; Jones v. Smith, 1 Hare, 43; Pringle v. Phillips, 5 Sandf. 157 ; Booth v. Barnum, 9 Conn. 286 ; Pitney v. … Hawley v. Cramer, 4 Cow. 717 ; Williamson v. Brown, 20 Law Rep. 397 .