Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

2.46s

  • State v. Vigliano

    50 N.J. 51 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 7, 1967

    The Hope Dell record, which clearly notes the above facts, shows also that at 1:10 n. m. on March 29 county prosecutor’s detective Edmond requested that Dario be kept at Hope Dell until further notice from him. … The witness qualified primarily as a chemist and toxicologist. In addition he said he had been associated with the State Police since 1939.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State v. Carlos Bolvito (071493)

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 2014

    Specifically, N.J.S.A. 2C:14-10 states that a person convicted of a qualifying sex offense “shall” be assessed the statutory penalty. … We construe that provision in accordance with established principles of statutory interpretation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • IN RE PROTEST OF CONTRACT AWARD FOR PROJECT A1150-18, ETC. (DIVISION OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2021

    Each subcontractor for the four trades enumerated in N.J.S.A. 52:32-2(a) must be "qualified in accordance with chapter 35 of Title 52." N.J.S.A. 52:32-2(b)(2). … The HVACR Licensing Laws created a Board of Examiners to establish HVACR licensing requirements and to oversee HVACR contractors. N.J.S.A. 45:16A-3 and -4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ROCKEMORE v. CITY OF CAMDEN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 26, 2023

    P. 12(b)(6) and/or to dismiss any defendant who is immune from suit.”); WHEREAS, on June 30, 2023, Defendant advised of its intention to file a Motion to Dismiss and requested … attacked on July 19, 2019, that “the city police department, the prosecutor[‘]s office & court system failed to protect [his] person, liberty & property as a citizen, tax payer, elderly & a qualified

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Matter of Prudential Ins. Co. Litig.

    282 N.J. Super. 256 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 1995

    Clearly, the codification of the particularity requirement in R. 4:36-2 was meant to halt abuses by insuring that shareholder plaintiffs use the courts as a last resort to bring about desired change. … Prudential's directors are elected by qualified voters. N.J.S.A. 17B:18-22. Qualified voters include "every policyholder who is 18 years of age or more and whose policy has been in force for at least 1 year."

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Mitchell

    245 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1991

    Such law shall become operative only if it is adopted by ordinance of the governing body of the municipality or county or by vote of the legally qualified voters thereof. … To function efficiently, special charter municipalities must assume that the provisions in their charters remain in effect unless general legislation expressly or clearly provides to the contrary.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Blackmon

    202 N.J. 283 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 2010

    That right is well-established and has been embodied in our Court Rules. … Small qualified as a relative within the meaning that term’s statutory definition, see N.J.S.A. 52:4B-36(n), -37, and therefore had a right to speak.

    Cited 182 timesPublished
  • Armaniaco v. Cresskill

    62 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1960

    The adoption of the established custom urged herein must come from the Legislature and not from the courts. … agency has no election whether or not to waive defects in a bid which fails to qualify in material particulars.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Menorah Chapels v. Needle

    386 N.J. Super. 100 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 2006

    General Price List for Menorah Chapels, effective June 1, 1998, provided: The special Orthodox ritual requirements of Tahara [ritual washing] and Watcher [shomer] will be carried out whether decedent is a man or woman by qualified … Such an intent clearly was not manifested by the parties at the time that the contract for services was executed, and cannot reasonably be inferred in the circumstances presented.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • F.B. v. A.L.G.

    176 N.J. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 2003

    However, certain subsections clearly are not applicable. Rule 4:50-2 requires an application for relief under subsections (a), (b), and (c) to be brought within one year of the judgment. … To qualify for federal funds, a State must certify that it will operate a child support enforcement program that conforms with the requirements of the Act, including, among other things, a comprehensive system to establish

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Adoption of Amendments to the Northeast Upper Raritan, Sussex County and Upper Delaware Water quality Management Plans to Establish Total Maximum daily Loads in the Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin And pompton lake/ramapo River Addressing Phosphorus Impairments and to Establish Watershed Criteria

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2014

    In her decision, the ALJ summarized the testimony of the seventeen witnesses presented by the parties, all of whom were qualified as experts in their fields. … That deference is clearly applicable in this case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Branella

    972 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 7, 1997

    As the statute clearly states, a prima facie case alleging a violation of Section 3604(a) is satisfied by evidence showing any one of the violative actions set forth. … a prima facie case: (1) the complainant is a member of a protected class; (2) she applied for and was qualified to rent the unit in question; (3) she was rejected; and (4) the unit remained available after she was rejected

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Spialter v. Testa

    162 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1978

    established legal rights of tenants or responsibilities of landlords as established by the law of this State at the time the lease is signed. … Defendants qualify. But for the damage clause which the landlord relied upon, the tenants would have had the refund by March 10, 1977.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Groh v. Groh

    439 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2014

    While the state did not at that time legalize same-sex marriages, the Act formally established the right *189 of same-sex couples to enter into civil unions, a legislatively created domestic status, which provided certain … The amendment was clearly intended and designed to permit people to end their marriages in a calm and dignified manner without having to engage in hurtful and unproductive mudslinging over who was at fault for the failure

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel

    161 N.J. Super. 317 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1978

    Such statement must “indicate the number of qualified units proposed, the price or rental ranges, and how the applicant intends to make the units available to qualified families.” … as low and moderate-income housing, if indeed they do not so qualify already.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Skillman's Executors

    18 N.J. Eq. 229 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1867

    The words in their natural meaning clearly would in all such cases, give an equal share to each of the children or heirs of the person so designated. … Thus the doctrine is established by a series of well considered cases, both in England and this country, that a devise or bequest like that under consideration, unless qualified by other parts of the will, gives the property

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ward v. Zelikovsky

    263 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1993

    The rule there stated was that "[w]henever words clearly `sound to the disreputation' of the plaintiff, there is no need of further proof, they are defamatory on their face and actionable per se." … Meanings of this sort fit comfortably within the immunity for name-calling. ... In daily life "racist" is hurled about so indiscriminately that it is no more than a verbal slap in the face; the target can slap back....

    Reversed on other grounds by Ward v. Zelikovsky, 136 N.J. 516 (1994)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Housing Inspection v. Frank Bright

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 2025

    DCA is further authorized to establish, through regulations, a schedule for required inspections. … The privilege "is not a blanket immunity" that allows an individual to refuse to answer all questions posed to them. Id. at 499-500.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • R.A.C. v. P.J.S.

    192 N.J. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 2007

    The Parentage Act was intended to “establish the principle that regardless of the marital status of the parents, all children and parents have equal rights with respect to each other and to provide a procedure to establish … Umsted, 446 F.3d 17 , 22 n. 4 (1st Cir.2006), and confers immunity on a defendant after running its course, Van Slyke v. Worthington, 265 N.J.Super. 603, 608 , 628 A.2d 386 (Law Div.1993).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • ESTATE OF SAULO DEL ROSARIO v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 9, 2020

    Response at 10; see also Leang, 198 N.J. at 587 (finding allegations sufficient for liability and precluding immunities). … Op. at 12.3 As to Defendant Kush, in the January Opinion, the Court declined to apply qualified immunity because it could not “rule on the reasonableness of the force” at the summary judgment stage, given remaining

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.