Case law

Dubois v. City of Saco

645 A.2d 1125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 10, 1994

Id.; see also City of Augusta v. Allen, 438 A.2d 472, 474 (Me.1981) (tax lien statutes to be strictly construed against the taxpaying authority); Scavone v. … State v. Fournier, 617 A.2d 998, 999 (Me.1992).

Prince v. Maine Central Railroad

122 Me. 130 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 25, 1922

Moran v. Street Railway, supra, has no application to this state of facts. 2. Contributory Negligence. … Apparently the plaintiff and his companion King, thinking that the hand car with its load of materials and tools weighing several hundred pounds might afford a serious obstruction to the train and endanger the lives on board

State v. Nigro

24 A.3d 1283 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 2011

State v. … See United States v. Brown, 500 F.3d 48, 54 (1st Cir.2007) ("Since [the informant] was known to the police, he could have been held accountable if his information proved inaccurate or false.”).

Haskell Implement & Seed Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

114 Me. 277 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 1915

Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S., 542 , and cases cited; Boston & Maine Railroad v. Hooker, 233 U. S., 97 , and cases cited; Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Plff. in Error, v. … Co. v.

State of Maine v. Ronald A. Harding

2024 ME 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 2024

State v. Brown, 2017 ME 59, ¶ 9, 158 A.3d 501. [¶15] Harding claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he inflicted a traumatic brain injury causing the victim’s death. Although he includes Dr. … State v.

Lerman v. City of Portland

675 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 11, 1987

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 547 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1496 , 84 L.Ed. 2d 494 (1985). The extent of the process due varies, depending on the nature of the case. Logan v. … The Court agrees with Plaintiff that the Colorado Supreme Court has provided an insightful analysis of damages issues in this area in Board of Commissioners v. Slovek, 723 P.2d 1309 (Colo.1986).

Prescott v. The Woodfords Club

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 10, 2017

In Nadeau v. … Defendants communicated the false statements to other Board members. 32.

O'GRADY v. Partridge

319 A.2d 115 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 1974

French, Appellant, 134 Me. 140 , 183 A. 130 (1936); American Can Co. v. Milk Control Board, 313 Mass. 156 , 46 N.E.2d 542, 545 (1943). … Pettingill v. Pettingill, 60 Me. 411 (1872).

Scarborough Barbeque v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 4, 2010

ToolJley v. TaWil of Frye Islnnd, 2008 ME 44, 9I 13, 943 A.2d 563, 566. II. Sufficiency of the Findings A zoning board of appeals is governed by the procedural requirements of 30-A M.R.S. § 2691. … The court may remand a matter to a board of appeals when the board fails to make sufficient and clear findings of fact necessary for effective judicial review. Sallborll v.

Plummer v. Webb

19 F. Cas. 894 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1825

The ease of Crosby v. … “Baron and Feme,” V; Russel v. Corne, 1 Salk. 119, 2 Ld. Raym. 1031; 1 Chit. Pl. 61.

Kobeckis v. Budzko

225 A.2d 418 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1967

Ingersoll Candy Co. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 674 , 59 P.2d 144 [3, 4], 148; Brown v. Nebiker (1941) 229 Iowa 1223 , 296 N.W. 366 [2], 371, and that properly prepared it will cause no harm. … Holt v.

Ryan v. City of Augusta

622 A.2d 74 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 1993

Fowler v. Carrollton Pub. … See, e.g., Armstrong v. Meyers, 964 F.2d 948, 950 (9th Cir.1992); Narumanchi v. Board of Trustees of Conn. State Univ., 850 F.2d 70 , 72 (2d Cir.1988); Parrett, 737 F.2d at 696-97 .

Opinion of the Justices of Supreme Judicial Court

308 A.2d 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 1973

After a careful review of approaches taken by the Massachusetts Court in the case of Rice v. Osgood, 9 Mass. 38 (1812) and Brown v. Porter, 10 Mass. 93 (1813), in conjunction with the attitude expressed by Mr. … In State v.

Craig v. Kennebec Regional Dev. Auth.

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2001

The seminal case in the area is Brown v. … Brown was followed by other "public use” cases including Crommett v. City of Portland, 150 Me. 217, 107 A.2d 841 (1954).

Citizens Bank New Hampshire v. Acadia Group Inc.

766 A.2d 1021 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 2001

See Kapler v. Kapler, 2000 ME 131, ¶¶ 9-11 , 755 A.2d 502, 506-07 (holding that review of divorce court’s determination of property value is for clear error); Rangeley Water Co. v. … Citizens Bank also relies on Plumbago *1025 Mining Corp. v. Sweatt, 444 A.2d 361 (Me.1982).

DOYLE v. RUMMSEY

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 29, 2022

, MSAD 51 School Board Members, Superintendent Jeffrey Porter and Board Member Ann Maksymowicz (together, the “MSAD 51 Defendants”). … Saldivar v.

Thompson v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

847 A.2d 406 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 10, 2004

.; see also Larrabee v. … United States Code, Section 31502 as amended or to regulations adopted pursuant to that section and who is represented for purposes of collective bargaining by a labor organization certified by the National Labor Relations Board

Witham v. Wing

108 Me. 364 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1911

In the case of Palmer v. … Brown v. Lawton, 87 Maine, 86; Bugbee v. Sargent, 23 Maine, 269.

Connolly v. Henrietta D. Goodall Hospital

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 6, 2006

Notice of that suspension was sent by the hospital to the Maine Board of Nursing which licenses Ms. … An agency, board, commission, council, member or employee of the legislative branch of State Government; C.

Garmong v. Henderson

115 Me. 422 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1916

Garmong v. Henderson, 114 Maine, 75, 90. … Garmong v. Henderson, supra.