Case law

State of Maine v. Dickson

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 27, 2013

The court is not persuaded by Defendant's argument that the facts of this matter distinguish this stop from those upheld in State v. McDonald, 201 0 ME 102, State v. Tozier, 2006 ME 105, State v. … Huether, 2000 ME 59, State v. Eklund, 2000 ME 175 and Hurtado v. State, 881 S.W.2d 738 (Tx. 1994).

Opinion of the Justices of Supreme Judicial Court

308 A.2d 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 1973

After a careful review of approaches taken by the Massachusetts Court in the case of Rice v. Osgood, 9 Mass. 38 (1812) and Brown v. Porter, 10 Mass. 93 (1813), in conjunction with the attitude expressed by Mr. … In State v.

Logan v. City of Biddeford

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 3, 2000

See Bailey v. City of South Portland, 1998 Me. 50, 98, 707 A.2d 391, 3 the description as a certain lot or parcel of land, rather than lots or parcels, does. … Since the deed itself has merged the formerly separate lots, the Planning Board and Board of Zoning Appeals were correct in their decisions.

Aetna Life Ins. v. Putnam

88 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 17, 1950

He paid nothing for either board or lodging at any time during the thirty years he lived with them. … Life Ins., *137 Co. v. Murphy, D.C.Mass.1942, 45 F.Supp. 826, 829 .

Steele v. Maine State Retirement

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 31, 2008

Seider v. Board of Exam'r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 <JI9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing eweo, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, <JI6, 703 A.2d 1258, 1261 (Me. 1997)). … Maine Bankers Ass'n v.

Antler's Inn & Restaurant, LLC v. Department of Public Safety

60 A.3d 1248 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2012

When the Town’s Board of Selectmen denied the requested license, the Inn appealed to the Bureau of Liquor Enforcement within the Department of Public Safety pursuant to 28-A M.R.S. §§ 82(5), 653(3) (2012). … Oronoka Rest, Inc. v. Me.

Dead River Co. v. Assessors of Houlton

149 Me. 349 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1953

(See Inhabitants of Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Me. 519 ). The situation may be likened to that which arises when several magnets are attracting the same piece of metal in different directions. … Butler et al. v. McPherson Brothers, 95 Miss. 635 , 49 So. 257 ; Mahan v. Clark, 219 Pa. 229 , 68 A. 667 ; Johnson v. Truitt, 122 Ga. 327 , 50 S. E. 135 . The dictum in Sands v.

State of Maine v. Matthew Rousseau

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 11, 2016

Under Terry v. … State v. Brown, 1997 ME 90, PS, 094 A.2d 453, 455.

Orono-Veazie Water District v. Penobscot County Water Co.

348 A.2d 249 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 2, 1975

In Foss v. … Co. v.

Grimes v. Town of Wells

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 16, 2000

GARBRECHT LAW LISRARY v. ORDER JUN 19 SB TOWN OF WELLS, et al., WONG ete Oe Defendants - Following hearing, and review of the administrative record and the memoranda of counsel, Mr. … The difficulty with the approach taken by the Planning Board is that it is not expressly permitted under the town’s ordinances. Perhaps the closest Maine case on point is Town of Kittery v.

State of Maine v. Edwards

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 8, 2001

CR-97-163 STATE OF MAINE san = g 2 TA Beye Hf 90 Clerk of Courts v. … See Aldus v. State, 2000 ME 47, ¥ 12, 748 A.2d 463, 467.

Mace v. Ship Pond Land & Lumber Co.

112 Me. 420 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1914

Phillips v. Rogers, 12 Met., 411 ; Lawrence v. Rokes, 61 Maine, 38; Sullivan v. P. & K. R. R. Co., 94 U. S., 806 . … Aggregating therefore the expenses of scaling, including the board of scaler, of surveying lines, and fire protection, we find it to amount to $3539.50.

Diva's, Inc. v. City of Bangor

176 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 2001

The plaintiffs, would-be owners of the establishments, sued the county board of commissioners in their individual capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … Serv., Inc. v.

EDGECOMB v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2023

v. Saul, No. 1:18-cv-00445-JHR, 2019 WL 5866068, at *5 (D. Me. … McClain’s and Milan’s less restrictive RFC opinions and PA Brown/Dr. O’Shanick’s and Dr.

Weigel v. Town of Wells

Superior Court of Maine · May 10, 2007

Twigg v. Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1996). Review of board findings is "for an abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings unsupported by substantial evidence in the record." O'Toole v. … This Court is "limited to determining whether the record contains evidence to justify the Board's determination." Lewis v. Maine Coast Artists, 2001 ME 75, «j[ 14, 770 A.2d 644, 650.

Sibley v. Penobscot Lumbering Ass'n

93 Me. 399 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1899

It is declared that the “corporate power” is vested in a board of trustees. … Moulton v. Scarborough, 71 Maine, 267.

Moreland v. Vomilas

127 Me. 493 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1929

Smith v. Putney, 18 Me., 87; Jewell v. Gage, 42 Me., 247. … Brown v. Hume, 16 Gratt (Va.), 456. The intent of the legislature in its use of the word “vacation” is what we are seeking.

Gerard v. Northern Transportation, LLC

146 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, D. Maine · May 24, 2001

See, e.g., Morris v. McComb, 332 U.S. 422 , 68 S.Ct. 131 , 92 L.Ed. 44 (1947); Brennan v. Schwerman Trucking Co., 540 F.2d 1200 (4th Cir.1976). In Crooker v. … See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). Generally, a court should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of a statute or regulation.

BRIGGS v. TOWN OF RUMFORD

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2019

In Ramsey v. … Durepos v. Town of Van Buren, 516 A.2d 565, 566 (Me. 1986); accord Barber v.

United States v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.

4 F. Supp. 3d 243 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 12, 2014

See United States v. Brown, 415 F.3d 1257, 1268 (11th Cir.2005) (“There is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself.”). … Brown, Chairman, Board of Trustees wherein Mr.