Case law

Brown v. . Williams

196 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1928

Miller v. Lash, 85 N. C., 51 ; Laurence v. Hester, 93 N. C., 79 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 ; Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 ; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312 ; Fertilizer Co. v. Eason, 194 N. C., 244 . 2. … Bailey v. Rutjes, 86 N. C., at p. 520-1; Blount v. Guthrie, 99 N. C., 93 ; Dorsett v. Dorsett, 183 N. C., 354 . See Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., at p. 397; Dorsey v. Corbett, 190 N. C., at p. 788.

Brown v. State

458 S.W.2d 192 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 8, 1970

The judgment making final the judgment nisi entered in Cause No. 3079 in the 31st District Court of Wheeler County, and adjudging that the State of Texas recover from the principal, William Robert Brown, and in like manner … United Bonding Insurance Company, as surety, the sum of $10,000.00 and all costs of suit; that *193 the execution issue and that the judgment draw interest at the rate of six percent from date, for the reasons set forth in Brown

Commonwealth v. Brown

195 A.3d 164 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2018

Pearson v. Brown

105 Ga. 802 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 18, 1898

In the first of these, Edison General Electric Co. v. … The case of Harder v. Carter, 97 Ga. 273 , follows this ruling, as does also that of Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & Avery, 101 Ga. 39 . In American Car Co. v.

Clem v. Brown

3 Ohio Misc. 167 · Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · May 14, 1965

Flandermeyer v. Cooper (1912), 85 Ohio St., 327 ; Smith v. Nicholas Bldg. Co. (1915), 93 Ohio St. 101 ; Kelly v. Bouche (1941), 21 Ohio Ops. 244 , 6 Ohio Supp. 327 . … Co. v. Jones, 21 Colo. 340 , 40 Pac. 891 .” In Sheard v. Oregon Electric Ry.

Brown v. Quinn

406 Mass. 641 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 14, 1990

We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review, see Brown v. Quinn, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 288 (1989), to examine the propriety of the dismissal of a draft report pursuant to Dist. Mun. Cts. R. Civ. … Director of the Div. of Employment Sec., 391 Mass. 403 (1984) (late ser *644 vice); Pierce v. Board of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804 (1976) (same); Gilmore v.

Rossi v. Brown

9 Cal. 4th 688 · California Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1995

(Geiger v. Board of Supervisors (1957) 48 Cal.2d 832, 836-837 [ 313 P.2d 545 ]; but see Rider v. … (Brosnahan v. Brown, supra, 32 Cal.3d 236, 241 .)

State v. Brown

212 Utah Adv. Rep. 38 · Court of Appeals of Utah · May 12, 1993

State v. Brown, 853 P.2d 851 (Utah 1992); State v. Gibbons, 740 P.2d 1309, 1311 (Utah 1987); State v. Archambeau, 820 P.2d 920, 922 (Utah App.1991). 1 See also State v. Loe, 732 P.2d 115, 117 (Utah 1987); State v. … In State v. Brown, 853 P.2d 851 (Utah 1992), the Utah Supreme Court clarified that issues raised for the first time on appeal would be addressed only if the trial court proceedings demonstrated “plain error.”

Wright v. Brown

68 Mo. App. 577 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1897

Wetzell v. Wagoner, 41 Mo. App. 509 ; Stinde v. Blesch, 42 Mo. App. 578 ; Brennan v. Roach, 47 Mo. App. 290 ; Henderson v. Mace, 64 Mo. App. 393 ; Tyler v. Parr, 52 Mo. 249 ; Bass v. Jacobs, 63 Mo. App. 393 ; Jones v. … App. 130 ; Gaty v. Sack, 19 Mo. App. 476 ; Timbermann v. Craddock, 70 Mo. 638 ; Bell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150 ; Millan v. Porter, 31 Mo. App. 576 ; Woods v. Stephens, 46 Mo. 555 .

Babcock v. Brown

25 Vt. 550 · Supreme Court of Vermont · May 15, 1853

Brown v. Harley

2 Fla. 159 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1848

Harley on the said 21st November, 1842, by the consideration of said Court recovered against one David Brown a judgment for,” &c.

Brown v. Beuc

384 S.W.2d 845 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1964

Brown, acting Building Commissioner of the City of St. Louis, Missouri; and the City of St. … Louis and not to the Board. The Board is without a vestige of legislative power. State ex rel. Nigro v. Kansas City, supra; Shiverdecker v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Fulton, Mo.App., 351 S.W.2d 43 ; Himmel v.

Brown v. Munger

42 Minn. 482 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Feb 10, 1890

Of this class of cases may be mentioned Clarke v. Price, 2 Wils. Ch. 157; Kemble v. Kean, 6 Sim. 333; Stocker v. Wedderburn, 3 Kay & J. 393; Pickering v. Bishop of Ely, 2 Younge & C. Ch. 249, 267. The case of Cooper v. … Allen v. Cerro Gordo Co., 40 Iowa, 349 .

Brown v. Havard

23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 161 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1980

In Smith v. … In Miles v.

State v. Brown

214 Neb. 665 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1983

Brown was brought to trial well within such 6-month limitation prescribed by § 29-1207, and therefore there was no error in overruling Brown’s motion for a new trial in that regard. Brown relies on Barker v. … As expressed in United States v.

State v. Brown

348 N.W.2d 743 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 18, 1984

See, e.g., State v. … Recently, in Escobedo v.

Brown v. Tenney

125 Ill. 2d 348 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1988

CHIEF JUSTICE MORAN delivered the opinion of the court: In December of 1983, plaintiff, Melvin Brown, filed a three-count verified complaint in the chancery division of the circuit court of Cook County against Richard Tenney … Rickey v. Chicago Transit Authority (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 546, 556 .

Brown v. McCurdy

278 Pa. 19 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1923

Brown then, made nursing necessary, and this service was performed, in addition, while the latter lived. … The mere fact that the claimant was a daughter-in-law of the decedent raises no presumption of gratuitous service (Schoch v. Garrett, 69 Pa. 144 ; Gerz v.

Griffin v. Brown

167 Iowa 599 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 14, 1914

In Scott v. … In Sneed v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

3 Serg. & Rawle 273 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1817

Humphrey Brown was indicted and convicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Bradford county, of a nuisance, in the erection of a dam, across Wyalusing creek, which had been declared a public highway, by an act passed 4th