Case law

Mayor of Nashville v. Brown

56 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1871

In Humes v. … In the case of Painter v.

Mayor of Nashville v. Brown

56 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1871

In Humes v. … In the case of Painter v.

Brown, Angela v. Yates Services, LLC

2016 TN WC 85 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 14, 2016

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO ANGELA BROWN ) Docket No.: 2015-05-0014 Employee, ) v. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge

Brown v. Tennessee Real Estate Commission

494 S.W.2d 506 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 1972

And in Real Estate Commission v. … And again, see Boyce v.

State Ex Rel. Myers v. Brown

209 Tenn. 141 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1961

In the case of Grant v. … In the case of George v.

Womack v. Brown-Forman Corp.

897 F. Supp. 2d 646 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 2012

Seeger, 681 F.3d at 283 (quoting Dixon v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 324, 333 (6th Cir.2007)); see also EEOC v. … Grace v. USGAR, 521 F.3d 655, 677 (6th Cir.2008); Warfield v. Lebanon Corr. Inst., 181 F.3d 723, 729 (6th Cir.1999).

Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc.

216 S.W.3d 780 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 4, 2006

For example, Plaintiff Dawn Brown borrowed $2,343.93 and pledged the title to her vehicle as security. … Within thirty days, Brown could redeem her vehicle for the amount of the loan, i.e., $2,343.93, plus an additional $292.99, which represented interest and the “redemption premium fee.” 2 Brown’s only obligation under the

Brown v. John Martin Construction Co.

642 S.W.2d 145 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1982

The custodian of the Second Injury Fund raised this question in Stovall v. General Shoe Corp., supra, and in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company v. Friar, supra. … The employer relies on Employers-Commercial Union Companies v. Taylor, 531 S.W.2d 104 (Tenn.1975), Cleveland-Tennessee Enamel Company v. Eaton, 517 S.W.2d 10 (Tenn.1974), and Gluck Brothers, Inc. v.

State of Tennessee v. Carl Brown

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 6, 2015

Carl Brown, Memphis, Tennessee, Pro Se. Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Jonathan H. Wardle, Assistant Attorney General; Amy P. … See State v. Anthony Todd Ghormley, No. E2014- 00736-CCA-R3-CD, 2015 WL 5560008, at *2-3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sept. 21, 2015).

Kenneth Brown v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 28, 2025

Brown v. … Brown v. Wardlow, No. 23-5966, 2024 WL 4729429, at *1 (6th Cir. May 20, 2024). Thereafter, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. Brown v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Howell

134 Tenn. 93 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

These are Conn v. Richmond, 17 Cal. App., 705 , 121 *101 Pac., 714, 719 , and Robinson v. Anderson, 26 Cal. App., 644 , 147 Pac., 1182 . … Leavenworth v. Wilson, 69 Kan., 74 , 76 Pac., 400 , 2 Ann. Cas., 367. The other Kansas case is Hay et al. v. Dorn (1914), 93 Kan., 392, 397 , 144 Pac., 235 -237.

State ex rel. Webb v. Brown

132 Tenn. 685 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1915

Lim., 93; Webb v. Garter, 129 Tenn., 182, 239 , 165 S. W., 426 . … Rucher v. Supervisor, 7 W. Va., 661 ; Purcell v. Parks, 82 Ill., 346 ; State v. *690 McDowell, 19 Neb., 442 , 27 N. W., 433 ; Louisville v. Wilson, 99 Ky., 598 , 36 S. W., 944 .

Carla Brown v. Jeremy Brittenum

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 16, 2021

03/16/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 12, 2021 CARLA BROWN v. … Brown v. John Roebuck & Assocs., Inc., No. M2008- 02619-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 4878621, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2009).

State of Tennessee v. Detarus Brown

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 30, 2025

State v. Wooden, 478 S.W.3d 585, 595 (Tenn. 2015) (quoting Cantrell v. Easterling, 346 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tenn. 2011)). Failure to award pretrial jail credits is a clerical error. State v. … In Archer v.

State v. Charles R. Brown

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 1, 2010

Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Cazes, 875 S.W.2d 253, 259 (Tenn. 1994). … State v. Fiorito, No. 03C01- 9401-CR-00032, 1995 WL 695031 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, November 27, 1995). See also State v.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. McCanless

184 Tenn. 83 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1946

Nixon v. McCanless, 176 Tenn. 352, 354 , 141 S. … McCanless v. State ex rel. Hamm, 181 Tenn. 308, 314 , 181 S. W. (2d) 154 , 153 A. L. R. 832; McCanless, Com’r v. Klein, 182 Tenn. 631, 639 , 188 S.

Sheila Brown v. Rico Roland

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 23, 2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 11, 2010 Session SHEILA BROWN v. … Shoffner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 494 S.W.2d 756, 758 (Tenn. 1972), overruled on other grounds by State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cummings, 519 S.W.2d 773 (Tenn. 1975).

Vicki Brown v. Antione Batey

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 9, 2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 8, 2010 Session VICKI BROWN V. … Storey v. Storey, 835 S.W.2d 593, 599 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). For as we stated, in Moody v. Hutcheson, 159 S.W. 3d 15 (Tenn. Ct.

Howard v. Fox

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 29, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 418 (6th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Burgess v. Fischer, 735 F.3d 462, 472 (6th Cir. 2013)).

Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc.

935 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 1996

Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir.1987). Title VII Claims Against Brown Group, Inc. … law tort claims against Brown Group, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED.