Case law

Lord v. Collins

76 Me. 443 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1884

will be noticed that the statute relating to the remedy of a party who pastures, feeds or shelters animals provides for a lien " thereon ;” that by § 40, of the statutes relating to the remedy of inn-holders and keepers of boarding-houses … Low v. Dunham, 61 Maine, 569.

Chapman v. Marcel's Barber Shop

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 10, 2022

CV-19-167 STEPHANIE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff V. … Tiemann v. Santarelli Enterprises, Inc., 486 A.2d 126, 131-32 (Me. 1984). This does not mean that factual findings from any report concerning a specific incident are inadmissible. In Daniels v.

Robert Goudreau v. Pine Springs Road and Water, LLC

60 A.3d 788 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 14, 2013

v. … In Goudreau v.

McManus v. Peerless Casualty Co.

114 Me. 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1915

Johnson v. Insurance Company, 83 Maine, 182; Boston v. Insurance Company, 89 Maine, 266; Strickland v. Casualty Co., 112 Maine, 100. … It was admitted that he operated a summer hotel or boarding house, but claimed that he was also a farmer and a teamster; and if so, the policy was void, and for two reasons: (1) *100 because the answer was untrue, and (2)

Seaward v. Coastal Lawn Care, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2016

Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 ME 75, '['[ 9, 14, 118 A.3d 789; Davis, 2011 ME 88, '[ 11, 26 A.3d 787. … Denman v. Peoples Heritage Bank, 1998 ME 12, <JI 9, 704 A.2d 411 (quoting Devine v.

Gaynor v. McEachern

437 A.2d 867 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1981

See Giles v. Maine Fidelity Life Insurance Co., Me., 423 A.2d 957, 959 (1980); Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals for the City of Bangor, Me., 398 A.2d 419, 420 (1979). … See also Roberts v. Tardif, Me., 417 A.2d 444, 450 (1980); cf. State v. Goyette, Me., 407 A.2d 1104, 1113 (1979).

Hall v. Patriot Mutual Insurance

942 A.2d 663 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2008

See Cash v. Green Mountain Ins. … Gillchrest v. Brown, 532 A.2d 692, 693 (Me.1987). Rather, loss of consortium is an injury that is understood to derive from the bodily injury of another. Id.

Toomey v. Inhabs. of the Town of Frye Island

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 19, 2007

(FOAA), and for declaratory judgment to have the board of selectmen's (Board) decision to appeal a prior judgment of this coure declared "null and void and of no legal effect." … Corp. v. Bangor Hisi~oric Track, Inc., 2000 ME 102, <JI6, 751 A.2d 1024, 1028 (citations omitted); Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm'n, 2004 ME 20, <JI 7,843 A.2d 43, 1 See Timothy Toomey v.

Tambrands, Inc. v. State Tax Assessor

595 A.2d 1039 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1991

See Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 169 , 103 S.Ct. 2933, 2942 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983).

In re Searsport Water Co.

118 Me. 382 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1919

nature, which has been enacted in many of the States, is, we think, to place the entire regulation and control of all public service corporations (or individuals engaged in supplying a public utility) in the hands of a Board … Board of Survey of Arlington v. Bay St. Ry., 224 Mass., 463, 469 . We think no rule of statutory construction is violated in so construing this Act. Black on Interpretation of Laws, pages 136, 137.

Schwanda v. Bonney

418 A.2d 163 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1980

Labbe v. Nissen Corporation, Me., 404 A.2d 564, 567 (1979); State v. Hussey, Me., 381 A.2d 665, 666 (1978); State v. Tullo, Me., 366 A.2d 843, 848 (1976). … Woodcock v. Atlass, Me., 393 A.2d 167, 170 (1978); Clark v. State Employees Appeals Board, Me., 363 A.2d 735, 738 (1976); Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products Company, Me., 241 A.2d 802, 805 (1968).

Warren v. Vinalhaven Light & Power Co.

424 A.2d 711 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 1981

Recently, in Ibbitson v. … Representative of recent cases thus mentioning the word “requirement” are Crocker v. Eastland Woolen Mill, Inc,, supra; Gaddis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Me., 382 A.2d 1045 (1978); and Bowen v.

Tilley v. Johnson

130 Me. 18 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 13, 1931

crosswalk, when the witness saw a car, which proved to be that of defendant, enter Broad Street from Main; heard a crash and saw what looked like a bag of potatoes roll from the right front fender of the car, along its running-board … House v. Ryder, 129 Me., 135, 150 A., 487 . Except for a condition of one leg, which plaintiff terms “nervous,” troubling him some at night, at the time of trial, his injuries seem to have been superficial.

State of Maine v. Williams

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 25, 2019

Thus, in Childs v. … Accord, Thorne v. Bailey, 846 F.2d 241,243 (4th Cir. 1988); State v. Brown, 85 P.3d 109, 113 (Ariz. App. 2004) (both relying on the statutory requirement of a specific intent to harass).

Onat v. Penobscot Bay Medical Center

574 A.2d 872 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1990

Mustafa V. … Koontz further averred that both of these corporations are managed by privately-selected boards of directors and that the corporations own the hospital property and privately distribute profits.

Damariscotta Rentals, LLC v. Bartow-Gilles

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 2, 2020

AP-2019-03 DAMARISCOTTA RENTALS, ) LLC ) Plaintiff/ Appellant, ) ) ) V. … Brown v. Tm.un of Starks, 2015 ME 47, Sf 6, 114 A.3d 1003. Otherwise, the issue is deemed waived. Id.; see Foster v.

Regan v. Maine S.A.D. 63

Superior Court of Maine · May 30, 2008

~itJ:·~I~,_. ..... , :'"1 T I' Plaintiff, $ , " i v. … Temple v. Inhabitants of City of Belfast, 30 F.Supp. 2d 60, 65 (D. Me. 1998). Under these circumstances, it would be difficult to find the existence of irreparable injury to the plaintiff.

Eastern Maine Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.

225 A.2d 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1967

Nebraska Power Co. v. Omaha Ice & Cold Storage, (1946) 147 Neb. 324 , 23 N.W.2d 312 . … Nebraska Power Co. v. Omaha Ice & Cold Storage, supra.

Jolovitz v. City of Waterville

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 26, 2003

JOLOVITZ, Appellant/Plaintit v. _ DECISION ON MOTION Str % ams FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF WATERVILLE and CITY OF WATERVILLE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, Appellees / Defendants This matter comes before the court on the motion … In the event the plaintiff cannot enforce a contract, he seeks relief by application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel, citing Chapman v. Bowman, 381 A.2d 1123 (Me. 1978).

Peach-Lambert v. Town of Kennebunk

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 10, 2011

(Zoning Board of Appeals Decision at 2.) … To bring a Rule 80B appeal, "a party must (1) have appeared before the board of appeals; and (2) be able to demonstrate a particularized injury as a result of the board's action." Wells v.