Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

0.54s

  • ELLIS v. SHIRIKAWA

    District Court, D. Maine · Nov 3, 2021

    See Godin v. Schencks, 629 F.3d 79 (1st Cir. 2010). … See Desjardins v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fielder v. Town of Raymond

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 5, 2001

    Lewis v. Town of Rockport, 1998 ME 144, J 11, 712 A.2d 1047, 1049; Oliver v. City of Rockland, 1998 ME 88, 7 8, 710 A.2d 905, 908. … Banks v. Maine RSA #1, 1998 ME 272, J 4, 721 A.2d 655, 657 (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Boucher v. Town of Mount Desert

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2003

    SMITH, ROBERTA ROBINSON, and ADAM WATRAS, Plaintiffs DECISION AND ORDER v. … Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43, 1999 ME 143, 12, 738 A.2d 1239.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Small v. Inhabitants of City of Belfast

    617 F. Supp. 1567 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 1985

    Dow v. Board of Directors for S.A.D. No. 5, Civ. No. 76-14 SD (D.Me. August 9, 1977). … See Aitchison v. Raffiani, 708 F.2d 96, 100-103 (3d Cir.1983); but see Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Quinn v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gilmartin v. Emery

    131 Me. 236 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1932

    Parsons v. Bangor, 61 Me., 457. Knox v. Montville, 98 Me., 493. … Gorham v. Canton, 5 Me., 266; Wayne v. Greene, 21 Me., 357; Corinth v. Lincoln, 34 Me., 310; Etna v. Brewer, 78 Me., 377; Knox v. Montville, supra. “Residence, being a visible fact, is not usually in doubt.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Doucette v. Washburn

    766 A.2d 578 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 22, 2001

    Cummings v. … See also Crooker v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Town of Topsham v. Local S/89 Dist. Lodge 4

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 20, 2003

    Under the Plan, the Town’s Board of Selectmen and Bada dl bad Town Manager share the executive authority. … Maritime Energy v. Fund Insurance Review Board, 2001 ME 45 { 7, 767 A.2d 812.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Unity Church of Greater Portland v. Bd. Of Zoning Appeals of the town of Falmouth, Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 12, 2000

    The basis for the decisions of the CEO and the Board appear on the record. See R. at 10, 65-66, 67; Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1026-27 (Me. 1982). … See Twigg v.Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1995); Sibley v. Inhabitants of the Town of Wells, 462 A.2d 27, 31 (Me. 1983); Cushing v. Smith, 457 A.2d 816, 823-24 (Me. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bonney v. Blaisdell

    105 Me. 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 10, 1909

    The parties mutually agreed to put their boats "in as good order and condition as though they were to be used by themselves, with their full equipment and inventories on board.” … Bush v. Holmes, 53 Maine, 417. The evidence is meager and not very satisfactory. But we think the plaintiff should have judgment for $3100 and interest from the date of the writ. Judgment for plaintiff accordingly.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Marston v. Thibodeau

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 31, 2014

    In Graffam v. Wray, the Law Court provided that "Disputes over church property ... may be resolved in the civil courts." 437 A.2d 627, 631 (Me. 1981). … Through 2006, the Church operated with a Board of Directors. Votes were held for officers and directors.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Storie v. Land Use Planning Commission

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 14, 2021

    Nelson v. … The LUPC's argument is drawn from the Law Court's opinion in Great Hill Fill & Gravel v. Board ofEnvironmental Protection, 641 A.2d 184 (Me. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Blanchard v. Php Props., Inc.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2005

    BLAN CHARD, Plaintiffs V. CV-04-281 PHP PROPERTIES, IN C,, et al, Defendants JASCO COI CC IC IGS ICE i-ek-tok ORDER FOX RIDGE CON DOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and CONSTANCE B. HUTCHINSON, jax 24 Plaintiffs v. … Rogers v, Jackson, 2002 ME 140, | 5, 804 A.2d 379, 380 (citations omitted). We give the party opposing a summary judgment the benefit of any inferences that might reasonably be drawn from the facts presented. Curtis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wilson v. Borstel

    73 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1882

    In Emerson v. … Judge Sprague says, in Knowlton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burkett v. Blaisdell

    137 Me. 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1941

    Powers v. Mitchell, 75 Me., 364; Power Co. v. Railroad, 113 Me., 103, 93 A., 41 . … Dec. 722 in his note to Dane v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Houghton v. Davenport

    74 Me. 590 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 17, 1883

    Bostick v. Keizer, 4 J. J. Marsh, 597; Manley v. Hunt, 1 Ohio, 257; Vandermark v. Jackson, 21 Kan. 263 ; Plant v. Smythe, 45 Cal. 161 ; Ells v. Tonsley, 1 Paige, 280 ; Padgett v. Lawrence, 10 Paige, 170 ; Moger v. … Garrett, 3 Ired. 457 ; Piatt v. Oliver, 2 McLean, 267 ; Cox v. Milner, 23 Ill. 476 ; Savery v. Browning, 18 Iowa, 246 ; Reed v. Ownby, 44 Mo. 204 . Drake Att. 6 ed. § 234.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Lewiston v. Verrinder

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 23, 2021

    The Zoning Board's jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges is irrelevant not only because those challenges are not ripe for review, but also because Defendant could have sought review of the Board's decision in front … As such, the Zoning Board's jurisdiction does not render res judicata inapplicable here.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham

    Superior Court of Maine · May 2, 2003

    Town of Steuben v. … Town of Eagle Lake v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Harris v. Town of York

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2015

    3 Mills v. … See Wickenden v. Luboshutz, 401 A.2d 995, 996 (Me. 1979) (deferring to Board of Appeals' determination that a studio structure was a preexisting nonconforming "dwelling").

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • DiBiase v. Universal Design & Builders, Inc.

    473 A.2d 875 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1984

    On the day the contract was signed, the Defendant informed the Plaintiff that the Town of Cape Elizabeth Planning Board had given final approval for the subdivision of all 23 lots and that completion of the subdivision plans … Doane v. Pine State Volkswagen, Inc., 377 A.2d 481 , 484 n. 2 (Me.1977); Gallegos v. Stokes, 593 F.2d 372, 375 (10th Cir.1979). But cf. Cushman v. Perkins, 245 A.2d 846 (Me.1968).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Reed

    75 Me. 264 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 1883

    Arglasse v. Muschamp, 1 Vern. 77; Massie v. Watts, 6 Cranch, 148, 160 ; Brown v. Desmond, 100 Mass. 267 . … Woodman v. Woodman, 3 Maine, 350; Fales v. Reynolds, 14 Maine, 89; Thomaston Bank v. Stimpson, 21 Maine, 195; Whitney v. Batchelder, 32 Maine, 313, 315; Howe v. Russell, 36 Maine, 115; Richardson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.