Case law

Brown v. State

473 So. 2d 1260 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 27, 1985

473 So.2d 1260 (1985) Larry Donnell BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 62922. Supreme Court of Florida. June 27, 1985. … By failing to object at trial, Brown waived any error in alleged comments on his failure to present evidence. See Maggard v.

Brown v. Harris

20 Ga. 403 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1856

In our opinion, “ a mere substitution by the plaintiff of Rogers & Meara as debtor, in the place of Brown & Harris,” would, of itself have abrogated the debt as to Brown & Harris. … The cause of action which that testimony proved, was &>. contract of Brown & Harris made with Isaac C. Harris, as¡ the agent of some one, whom the testimony did not show..

Simpson, Mark Twain

Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2015

(quot- ing Howell v. State, 175 S.W.3d 786, 792 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (quot- ing Brown v. State, 870 S.W.2d 53, 55 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994))). … App. 2007); see also State v. Zalman, 400 3 S.W.3d 590 (Tex. Crim.

State v. Brown

32 La. Ann. 1020 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 15, 1880

Keen v. Brown

46 Fla. 487 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 15, 1903

This was not true in the cases of Smith v. Gibson, 14 Fla. 263 , and Swepson v. Call, 13 Fla. 337 , where the petition did not aid the order. … Davis v. Hall, 4 Jones Eq. (N. C.) 403. See, also, 9 Encv. Pl. & Pr. 613 ; Greenup v. Crooks, 50 Ind. 410 ; Williams v. Cheatham, 99 Ga. 301 , 25 S. E. Rep. 698 .

Brown v. State

412 So. 2d 420 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 14, 1982

412 So.2d 420 (1982) James Frederick BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 79-459. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 14, 1982. *421 Robert L. … See, also, Davis v. State, 350 So.2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) and Lattimore v.

Hull v. Brown

35 Wis. 652 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1874

It was a primary liability, and is quite analogous in principle to the contract entered into in Vogel v. Melms, 31 Wis., 306 ; Young v. French, ante, p. 111; Aldrich v. Ames, 9 Gray, 76 , and that class of cases. … See also Mountstephen v. Lakeman, Law Reports, 7 Q. B., 196.

Brown v. Irwin

21 Vt. 68 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Dec 15, 1848

In Bruce v. … In Hewet v. Mantell, 2 Wils. 374, the learned judge declared to the same effect.

People v. Brown

106 N.Y.S.3d 664 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Jul 25, 2019

Brown v. People

36 Mich. 203 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1877

.— Burt v. The State, 23 Ohio St., 394 . … —Com. v. McDonald, 110 Mass., 405 ; State v. Burgdorf, 53 Mo., 65 ; People v. Brown, 47 Cal., 447 . The circuit judge gave several instructions on this part of the case, and most of which were unobjectionable.

Guthrie v. Brown

192 Minn. 434 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Oct 26, 1934

Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 146 Minn. 202 , 178 N. W. 881 ; Soderberg v. Taney, 152 Minn. 376 , 188 N. W. 993 ; Klare v. Peterson, 161 Minn. 16 , 200 N. W. 817 ; Primock v. Goldenberg, 161 Minn. 160 , 200 N. … W. 537 ; Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey, 174 Minn 450, 219 N. W. 774 ; Mechler v. McMahon, 180 Minn. 252 , 230 N. W. 776 ; Heikkinen v. Cashen, 183 Minn. 146 , 235 N. W. 879 ; Brown v. Raymond Bros. M. T.

People v. Brown

125 A.D.3d 1550 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2015

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the fact that he was photographed from a closer range did not impermissibly draw attention to his photograph in the array (see People v Brown, 169 AD2d 934, 935 [1991], lv denied 77 NY2d … 958 [1991]; see also People v Smiley, 49 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 870 [2008]).

Brown v. Ward

53 Md. 376 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 30, 1880

Brown v. People

158 Colo. 561 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Dec 13, 1965

Brown was convicted on both counts and his codefendant, Glymph, was convicted on the first count only. Each was sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary. … Evans v. U. S., 242 F.2d 534 ; Rettich, et al. v. U. S., 84 F.2d 118 ; Benton v. U. S., 70 F.2d 24 ; Rose v. U. S., 274 Fed. 245 . The holding in the Evans case, supra, is based on Fed. R. Crim.

People v. Brown

931 N.W.2d 368 · Michigan Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2019

Wakefield v. Brown

38 Minn. 361 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Apr 30, 1888

“Execution,” H, 724; Hutsonpiller v. Stover, 12 Grat. 679; Michell v. Cue, 2 Burrow, 660; U. S. v. Hanford, 19 John. 173 ; Noland v. Seekright, 6 Munf. 185 . … Real Prop. 281, (marg. p. 566;) Hommel v. Devinney, 39 Mich. 522 ; Nixon v. Cobleigh, 52 Ill. 387 ; Lyon v. Kain, 36 Ill. 362, 369 ; Middleton v. Findla, 25 Cal. 76, 81 ; Fallen v. Kehoe, 38 Cal. 44 ; Staak v.

Brown v. State

269 So. 3d 476 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Feb 13, 2018

Funchess v. State , 202 So.3d 1286 , 1290 (¶ 9) (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). "Additionally, under Strickland v. … Walden v. State , 201 So.3d 1042 , 1045 (¶ 14) (Miss. 2016) (quoting Vielee v. State , 653 So.2d 920 , 922 (Miss. 1995) ). Brown has not shown good cause why he has not provided affidavits other than his own.

State v. Brown

2015 Ohio 3402 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2015

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2015-Ohio-3402.] … State v. Robinson, 3d Dist. Hancock No. 5-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5346, ¶17.

State v. Brown

2014 Ohio 314 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 2014

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-314.] … State v.

Brown v. Luehrs

79 Ill. 575 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

Moeller & Busch testified that the money left their office the next morning, was sent to Brown, but could not say that it reached' him. Brown testified that he never received the money. … and pay it to Brown, and take his receipt; that witness took the blank receipt book of the firm of Moeller.-& Busch, filled out the receipt ready for signing, and took the money and receipt book to Brown,' gave the money