Case law

Brown v. Watson

115 Ga. 592 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 4, 1902

Hall v. Holmes, 42 Ga. 179 ; Huff v. Markham, 70 Ga. 284 . 2. Inasmuch as the granting of an injunction in the present case was contrary to the law as above announced, the judge erred in granting the same. 3. … This case differs in its facts from Brooks v. Stroud, 111 Ga. 857 . In that case the alleged tenant denied the tenancy and claimed title to the land.

People v. Brown

58 A.D.3d 540 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 2009

Accordingly, this issue is unpreserved (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits.

Brown v. Weik

725 S.W.2d 938 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 11, 1985

Simmons v. … In Tipton v.

Field v. Brown

24 Gratt. 74 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Nov 26, 1873

Nichols v. Aylor, 7 Leigh 546 . … In the case of Nichols v.

Brown v. Babcock

273 Or. 351 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1975

See Budd v. Nixen, supra at 854. … See also Citizens Ins. v. Signal Ins. Co., 261 Or 294, 297 , 493 P2d 46 (1972). Cf. Berry v. Branner, 245 Or 307, 311-12 , 421 P2d 996 (1966); and Frohs v.

Brown v. Dunckel

46 Mich. 29 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1881

This case began in justice’s court where Dunckel replevied from Brown a horse which he claimed as owner. Brown defended in the right of Roehm & Davison for whom he was agent. … The jury returned their verdict for the plaintiff. *33 The instructions given were in accordance with the rulings in Hotchin, v. Secor 8 Mich. 494 ; Sage v. Walker 12 Mich. 425 , and Burchard v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

555 S.W.2d 252 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1977

As explained in Jewell v. … The Brown boys are white. 4 . They had gone to college together, and Collins said that he “used to buy marijuana” from Mark. 5 . “Mullaney v.

Rosenthal v. Brown

247 N.Y. 479 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1928

(Smith v. Craig, 211 N. Y. 456, 460 .) … (Toplitz v. Bauer, supra; Small v. Housman, 208 N. Y. 115 .)

Brown v. Bigné

14 L.R.A. 745 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1891

(Lathrop v. Amherst Bank, 9 Met. 489 ; Gilbert v. Holmes, 64 Ill. 548 ; Barker v. Barker, 14 Wis. 142 ; Lafferty v. Jelley, 22 Ind. 471 ; Halloway v. Lowe, 7 Port. (Ala.) 488; Weakly v. Hall, 13 Ohio, 167; 42 Am. … (Dorwin v. Smith, 35 Vt. 69 ; Findon v. Parker, 11 M. & W. 675; Stanley v. Jones, 7 Bing. 369.)

Commonwealth v. Brown

200 A.3d 942 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2019

Brown v. State

354 S.W.3d 518 · Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · Nov 17, 2011

Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763 (Tex.Crim.App.2006); Cardona v. State, 665 S.W.2d 492, 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). … Cobb v. State, 851 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tex.Crim.App.1993).

Stark v. Brown

101 Ill. 395 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1882

therefore, on the hearing, gave evidence tending to show that he had color of title, made in good faith, and paid all taxes assessed thereon for more than seven successive years, and so that their defence against the claim of Brown … Phelps v. Funkhouser, 39 Ill. 401 ; Cutter v. Thompson, 51 id. 390; Gridley v. Watson, 53 id. 186; Shoemate et al. v. Lockridge, id. 503 ; Foltz v. Prase, 17 id. 487; Walbridge v. Day, 31 id. 379; Helm v.

Brown v. Grove

116 Ind. 84 · Indiana Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1888

Nealis v. Dicks, 72 Ind. 374 . Cavanaugh v. Smith, 84 Ind. 380 ; Earle v. Earle, 91 Ind. 27 . The appellee was neither plaintiff nor defendant. Henry W. Grove was the sole party to the suit.

Simpson, Mark Twain

Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2015

(quot- ing Howell v. State, 175 S.W.3d 786, 792 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (quot- ing Brown v. State, 870 S.W.2d 53, 55 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994))). … App. 2007); see also State v. Zalman, 400 3 S.W.3d 590 (Tex. Crim.

Brown v. State

533 So. 2d 1118 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1988

In Sheffield v. … In Sanders v.

State v. Brown

2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0855 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2015

Brown’s application. … Brown is not charged with a crime which requires the specific intent to kill. See State v. Brumfield, 329 So.2d 181, 189-90 (La. 1976).

Brown v. State

85 Ark. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 10, 2004

See also Pennington v. State, 24 Ark. … A hearing on the State’s petition to revoke Brown’s probation was held immediately following the two bench trials. Brown’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v.

Brown v. Johnstone

5 Ohio App. 3d 165 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1982

In the syllabus of Keaton Co. v. … The Keaton court cited to Wyler v.

State v. Brown

201 S.C. 417 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Sep 6, 1942

In discussing Sections 18 and 21 of Article V of the Constitution of 1895 in the ease of State v. Wolfe, 61 S. C., 25, 39 S. E., 179, 180 , this Court through Mr. … State v. Jeter, 47 S. C., 2, 24 S. E., 889 .

State v. Brown

152 Iowa 427 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 19, 1911

Brown, 146 Iowa, 113 ), 'that be bad repeatedly threatened bis life, bad armed himself with a deadly weapon, and, with knowledge that deceased was about Mrs. … In State v.