Case law

Opinion No. 73-270 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1974

Title 63 O.S. 1 -208.1 [ 63-1-208.1 ](a) (1971) state in part: "The state board of health may establish regional guidance centers for regions designated by the board, such regions to be selected by the board on the basis … See Lairmore v. Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762 (1948); Board of Commissioners of Harmon County v. R. J. Edwards, Inc., 140 Okl. 247 , 282 P. 1090 (1930).

Opinion No. 49-0727 Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 1949

OPINION — AG — ** STATE BUILDING — STATE BOARD OF REGENTS — UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS ** AS THE TIME OF SENATE BILL NO. 99 THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, AS CONTRACTING AGENT, HAD SEVERAL BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE … (REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, CONSTRUCTION, LEGISLATION) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 74 O.S. 63 [ 74-63 ], 70 O.S. 1916 [70-1916] 70 O.S. 1916 .8 [70-1916.8], OPINION NO. JUNE 6, 1949 — DOYLE (FRED HANSEN)

Opinion No. (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1980

See AMF Tubescope Co. v. Hatchel, 547 P.2d 374 (Okl. 1976). However, in Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v. … See Felber v. Foote, 321 F. Supp. 85 (Dist. Conn. 1970).

Opinion No. 73-298 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1974

to the effect that the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund created by Senate Bill No. 73 is a "special fund" as referred to in Oklahoma Constitution, Article X , Section 23 , is supported by the decision in the case of Draper v. … Draper v. State Board of Equalization, supra. However, while in session, the Second Session of the Thirty-fourth Legislature may properly appropriate the cash on hand in the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund. (Odie A.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 12, 1982

OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION — PROTEST — HEARING ** (1) UNDER 68 O.S. 2465 [ 68-2465 ], AN INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER WHO FILES A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, FEELING HIMSELF AGGRIEVED BY … BY VIRTUE OF THE DECISION OF THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT ' STATE EX REL POULOS V.

W. R. Grimshaw Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa

563 P.2d 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1977

Brown v. Eastman Nat’l Bank, Okl., 291 P.2d 828 , 55 A.L.R.2d 971 (1955); Guthrie Nat’l Bank v. Gill, 6 Okl. 560 , 54 P. 434 (1898). … See Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County v. Snellgrove, Okl., 428 P.2d 272 (1967). In our opinion at least two instructions given by the trial court were prejudicial to Grimshaw.

Chapman v. Tulsa Used Lumber Wrecking Company

299 P.2d 787 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1956

Board of Equalization is the correct and proper valuation of the property. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD. and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Ritchie v. State

46 Okla. Crim. 155 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1930

Roebuck v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 241 , 170 Pac. 277 ; Adair v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 619 , 180 Pac. 253 ; Martin v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 248 , 250 Pac. 552 ; King v. State, 44 Okla. Cr. 311 , 280 Pac. 855 . … Edwards v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 306 , 131 Pac. 956 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 701; Baldock v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 203 , 182 Pac. 265 ; Burns v. State, 37 Okla.

Yellow Taxicab & Baggage Co. v. Cooke

171 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1935

Co. v. … Co. v.

Huffaker v. Town of Fairfax

115 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1925

Smith, Ark., v. … Co. v. Vance, 74 Okla. 261 , 180 Pac. 693 .

In Re Variance of Schrader

660 P.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1983

See also Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178 , (Okl.1975), and Nuchoils v. Board of Adjustment of Tulsa, 560 P.2d 556 , (Okl. 1977). … Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Puckett, 353 P.2d 4 (Okl.1960). Second, hardship must be peculiar to the particular piece of property.

Hayes v. Owen

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023

Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199). … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199).

Cathey v. Sheriff Vic Regalado

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2020

See Brown v. Glanz, 2016 WL 3632713, at *6 (N.D. Okla. … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1167 (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424, U.S. 319, 332 (1976)).

Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. Tipken

190 Okla. 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1942

Lusk v. Green, 114 Okla. 113 , 245 P. 636 ; Brazell v. Brown, supra; Parker et al. v. Parker et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 144 S.W. 2d 303 ; Louisiana Canal Co. v. … Carlock v. Krug et al., 151 Kan. 407 , 99 P. 2d 858 ; Brazell v. Brown, supra; Parker et al. v. Parker et al., supra.

Opinion No. 76-217 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1976

In Allen v. … Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , 477 (1964), and Jack v. State, 183 Okl. 375 , 82 P.2d 1033 (1937).

Opinion No. 75-110 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1975

board will suffice to carry out the directions of the act. … See Gammill v. Shackelford, 480 P.2d 920 (1970), and Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 468 P.2d 501 (1970).

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 2011

The court also found in Board of Commissioners v. … The Supreme Court discussed the role of county commissioners in Board of Commissioners v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1988

Taber v. Carter Oil Co., 57 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1936); Fearnside v. Graham, 1 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1931). … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 (Okla. 1977). The intended effect of 68 O.S. 2467 was to provide an adequate remedy to the taxpayer without disrupting the local budget process.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1989

Hughes Drilling Co. v. … Although the Board is not authorized to budget monies generally appropriated to the DAC, the Board does have the right and duty to communicate its recommendations regarding the Board's administrative needs to the DAC.

McArdle v. Stewart

446 P.2d 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1968

In Olmstead v. … J., IRWIN, V. C. J., and DAVIDSON, WILLIAMS, HODGES and LAVENDER, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, BERRY and McINER-NEY, JJ., dissent.