Case law

State v. Brown

176 N.C. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2006

Morisey v. . Brown

144 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1907

University v. Borden, 132 N. C., 416 . The appellant, conceding this to be the law, insists that the devise of “all the residue of my lands in Sampson County” is a residuary devise. We do not concur in that view.

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

State v. Brown

630 S.E.2d 257 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 26, 2006

State v. Brown

624 S.E.2d 431 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2006

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005

State v. Brown

13 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1971

State v. … State v. Fletcher and State v. Arnold, 279 N.C. 85 , 181 S.E. 2d 405 (1971) ; State v. Burton, 256 N.C. 464 , 124 S.E. 2d 108 (1962).

Grant v. . Brown

212 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1937

Warren v. Dail, 170 N. C., 406 , 87 S. E., 126 . To hold otherwise would be to allow the defendant “to have his cake and eat it too.” Young v. Hood, Comr., 209 N. C., 801 , 184 S. E., 823 . … Whitmire v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 101 , 170 S. E., 118 . The cause will be remanded for judgment accordant herewith. Modified and affirmed.

State v. Brown

612 S.E.2d 693 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 9, 2005

State v. Brown

612 S.E.2d 446 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 25, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 854 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 2005

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 2005

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 2005

Little v. . Brown

126 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900

Corlyn v. … The cases of Overman v. Sims, 96 N. C., 451 , and Overman v. Tate, 114 N. C., 571 , differ from this.

State v. Brown

100 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1888

Bost v. Bost, 87 N. C., 477 ; Perry v. Jackson, 88 N. C., 103 ; Malloy v. Bruden, 86 N. … Of the instructions asked and refused as well as those given, it is only necessary to refer to the cases of State v. Davis, 92 N. C., 764 , and State v. Moody, 98 N.

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 854 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2005

Cox v. . Brown

27 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1844

Brown v. . Miller

108 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Woodlief v. Harris, 95 N. C., 211 ; Gwathney v. Etheridge, 99 N. C., 571; State v. Logan, 100 N. C., 454 . … Raw lings v. Hunt, 90 N. C., 270 , and cases there cited. The defendants further contend that the bale of cotton in question belonged to Fisher, the landlord, as and for the rent due to him from Patterson.