Opinion

Grant v. . Brown

  • 212 N.C. 39
  • 192 S.E. 870
  • 1937 N.C. LEXIS 230
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Sep 22, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Stagy
On the bench
Stagy, Devin, Baenhill
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.2%

The opinion

Stagy, C. J.

The record, as it appears here, is barren of any evidence to support the verdict on the second cause of action. This will be stricken out, and as thus modified, judgment will be entered for the plaintiff on the first cause of action.

*40

The defendant having denied any extension of the option, and pleaded the statute of frauds, will not be permitted to retain moneys paid on the purchase price after the expiration of the option.

Warren v. Dail,

170 N. C., 406 , 87 S. E., 126 . To hold otherwise would be to allow the defendant “to have his cake and eat it too.”

Young v. Hood, Comr.,

209 N. C., 801 , 184 S. E., 823 . This is not after the manner of fair dealing.

Whitmire v. Ins. Co.,

205 N. C., 101 , 170 S. E., 118 .

The cause will be remanded for judgment accordant herewith.

Modified and affirmed.

DeviN and BaeNhill, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this ease.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.