Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.13s
Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n
83 N.J. Eq. 494 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 1, 1914
They selected the trustees and qualified them by giving to each the legal title to a cemetery lot in order that they might be ostensible lot owners, which lots they were severally required to retransfer to the corporation … Brrt even if the third section should be found to be clearly retrospective, yet it could not affect the vested' rights of any interested person, and this act so construed would have the effect of depriving the complainants
Modified on other grounds by Attorney-General, ex rel. Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n, 85 N.J. Eq. 501 (1916)Cited 8 timesPublished36 N.J. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1961
Persons involved in a traffic accident resulting in a fatality where a violation of the traffic regulation provisions of Title 39 is established. 3. … That concern does not end with the issuance of original licenses to qualified drivers, for it is equally vital that the drivers remain so at all times and be fit whenever they apply for their renewal licenses. Cf.
Cited 25 timesPublished346 N.J. Super. 583 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 2002
The amicus brief submitted by the Parole Board demonstrates the intricate nature of establishing primary parole eligibility dates. … Such sentences are clearly illegal and correctable in post-conviction relief proceedings.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 26, 2022
Under Section 1915, this Court may excuse a litigant from prepayment of fees when the litigant “establish[es] that he is unable to pay the costs of his suit.” Walker v. … If Plaintiff files an amended pleading, he must clearly explain the alleged wrongful conduct and the legal basis for any claims.
Cited 0 timesUnknown298 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1997
It is thus apparent that the existence of the conspiracy and defendant’s participation were established wholly apart from the hearsay declarations. V. … We are nevertheless clearly convinced that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Cited 18 timesPublished72 N.J. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 11, 1977
The word "term" as used in this statutory phrase clearly means term of office as legislator. … We submit that the ineligibility clause quite definitely and clearly falls into this latter category.
Cited 98 timesPublished133 N.J. 610 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1993
Medical experts were able to establish a significant but unmeasurable risk of contracting cancer. … Plaintiff did not suffer from any injury or condition clearly related to asbestos exposure. Further, plaintiff was a heavy smoker.
Cited 37 timesPublishedUNITED AERIAL ADVERTISING INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 11, 2020
. § 2201 to establish Defendants’ violations of Plaintiff’s rights, privileges and immunities and injunctive relief to cease the alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement by Defendants. … Indeed, § 1343(a)(3) is one of two methods of establishing jurisdiction over section 1983 claims; the other method is through federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Cited 0 timesUnknownComcast of South Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
27 N.J. Tax 79 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 20, 2013
Second, the taxpayer has the burden of establishing that it qualifies for the exemption it seeks. Third, under the Act, sales and use tax presumptively is payable. … A “prevailing taxpayer” is defined as one who establishes that the position of the State was without reasonable basis in law or fact as determined by the court. Ibid.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 25, 2023
Moreover, the New Jersey State Parole Board was established within the New Jersey Department of Corrections, see N.J. Stat. § 30:4-123.47(a); and the NJDOC is a state agency entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. … “Inmates clearly retain protections afforded by the First Amendment, ... including its directive that no law shall prohibit the free exercise of religion.” DeHart v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrennan v. Poritz (In Re Brennan)
198 B.R. 445 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 8, 1996
Standard of Review On appeal, this court may set aside the bankruptcy court’s factual findings only if the findings are clearly erroneous. … Another situation in which a bankruptcy court’s authority to enjoin a state regulatory action under § 105 is clearly established is where a state seeks to pursue a claim that would effectively contravene a specific bankruptcy
Cited 13 timesPublished208 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1986
He should have competent counsel and you are qualified and you are competent and I’ve seen you in action and you’ll do well for him. You’re doing it, not him. … I felt that he clearly met the criteria of the statute respecting competency to stand trial.
Cited 18 timesPublishedSabino v. Director, Division of Taxation
17 N.J. Tax 29 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 22, 1997
If an enabling statute fails to establish adequate standards to govern the discretion of an agency, the delegation of authority to the agency is improper. … Clearly, however, the Legislature did not intend to incorporate through N.J.S.A 54A:5-1.c all the substantive provisions of the Code relating to gains and losses, and just as clearly it did not intend to allow capital loss
Cited 7 timesPublishedCarmichael v. Pennsauken Township Board of Education
462 F. Supp. 2d 601 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 27, 2006
At oral argument, it was established that a committee made the decision. … Plaintiff does not bear his burden. 15 .Because this Court has held that no constitutional right has been violated, it need not address Defendants’ municipal liability and qualified immunity arguments. See Sanford v.
Cited 0 timesPublished416 N.J. Super. 286 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 14, 2010
Plaintiff also contends that if we prohibit it from proceeding with its foreclosure action, Hough "would clearly have been unjustly enriched," when, in fact, her own acts or omissions materially contributed to the mortgage … To implement the legislative process of the FHA, the Legislature established COAH, N.J.S.A. 52:27D-305a, and appointed the HMFA as the agency to "establish affordable housing programs to assist municipalities in meeting the
Cited 1 timesPublished891 F. Supp. 189 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 14, 1995
This claim clearly misconstrues the computations undertaken in this case. … Clearly, then, this definition encompasses conspiracies to distribute controlled substances such as heroin. 10 .
Cited 5 timesPublished270 N.J. Super. 55 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 1994
Defendant's other ineffective assistance of counsel arguments relating to the conduct of his trial involve matters of trial strategy within the discretion of defense counsel and are clearly without merit. … The Constitution does not require that sentencing should be a game in which a wrong move by the judge means immunity for the prisoner.
Cited 33 timesPublishedKnickerbocker Trust Co. v. Carhart
71 N.J. Eq. 495 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 4, 1906
Carhart to act as a director and as its secretary, at a salary of $2,000 a year, and qualified him by issuing to him a share of stock. … Clearly the argument put forward by counsel for complainant would lead to the abrogation of the well-established rule in New Jersey that a debtor may prefer a creditor. *507 The present case is entirely distinct from that
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re Trust Agreement Dec. 20, 1961
399 N.J. Super. 237 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 17, 2006
During his life, Johnson established a number of trusts to which his several children were made beneficiaries. … Such an attempt at proof does not suffice to establish a grantor's probable intent.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 24, 2026
Defendants point to judicial immunity and argue that Judge Dowd’s and Judge Spencer’s actions are immune from suit because they acted in their judicial capacity. (State Mot. at 5-8; Town Mot. at 12-16.) … “Like other forms of official immunity, judicial immunity is immunity from suit, not just from ultimate assessment of damages.” Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna