Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.13s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976
Board, but only after the Board, by a majority vote thereof, shall have authorized and directed such performance by said Chairman." … This interpretation is consistent with the general rule that statutory grants of authority to Boards of County Commissioners are strictly construed. See Allen, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 1976
In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Welch, 446 P.2d 268 , 270 (Okl. 1968); Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 442 P.2d 309 , 311 (Okl. 1968); see also W.S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927
In the case of Gilmore v. … Wagnon v. Davison. 79 Okla. 209 , 129 Pac. 565 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1968
that had such officers been in a meeting of the Board they would have voted to ask for the opinion as a Board. … In the case of Draper v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 1962
STATE BY SOME OTHER STATE BOARD, AGENCY, COMMISSION, OR INSTITUTION? … OWING TO A STATE BOARD, AGENCY, COMMISSION, OR BY A COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN AND WHICH HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO BE WORTHLESS AND CANNOT BE COLLECTED, BE VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE V, SECTION 53 ?
Cited 0 timesPublished161 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1932
In Stoner v. … M., K. & T. v. City of Tulsa, 113 Okla. 21 , 238 P. 452 ; Grier v. Tulsa, 143 Okla. 244 , 288 P. 957 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa, 15 Fed. (2d) 960.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023
Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199). … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199).
Cited 0 timesUnknown113 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925
Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1975
board will suffice to carry out the directions of the act. … See Gammill v. Shackelford, 480 P.2d 920 (1970), and Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 468 P.2d 501 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublished206 Okla. 318 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1952
In Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Tulsa, 200 Okla. 285 , 193 P. 2d 291 , this court was considering similar amendatory, rezoning ordinances of Tulsa. … James, County Treasurer, v. State ex rel. Finney, etc., 160 Okla. 99 , 15 P. 2d 591 ; Foote v. Town of Watonga, 37 Okla. 43 , 130 P. 597 . Affirmed. HALLEY, V. C.
Cited 9 timesPublished55 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916
Gen. v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Atty. Gen. v. Railway Co., 35 Wis. 425 ; Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540 , 74 N. W. 357 . … Co. v. Malone, 116 Ala. 600 , 22 South. 897 ; Dyer v. Brogan, 70 Cal. 136 , 11 Pac. 589 ; Wilkinson v. Carter, 22 Neb. 186 , 34 N. W. 351 ; Town of Woodville v. Harrison, 73 Wis. 360 , 41 N. W. 529 ; Lowry v.
Cited 33 timesPublished749 P.2d 1137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1988
NANTZ, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann NANTZ, Appellee. No. 62029. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 2, 1988. As Corrected February 3, 1988. Dan R. Brown, Lawton, for appellant. John N. … Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges, Okl., 535 P.2d 295, 298 [1975], citing Graham v.
Cited 19 timesPublished66 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1917
McDonald v. Stiles, 7 Okla. 327 , 54 Pac. 487 ; Cope v. Braden, 11 Okla. 291 , 67 Pac. 475 ; McClung v. Penny, 11 Okla. 474 , 69 Pac. 499 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 225 ; Hack v. … Cahill v. Pine Creek Oil Co., 38 Okla. 568 , 134 Pac. 64 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1968
Arkansas Amusement Corporation v. Kempner, 182 Ark. 897 , 33 S.W.2d 42 ;Morgan v. Tennessee Valley Authority, C.C A. Tenn., 115 F.2d 990 ; Tucker v. State, 218 Ind. 614 , 35 N.E.2d 270 . … Crable v. Carter, 187 Okl. 421 , 103 P.2d 518 ; Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635 , 56 A.L.R. 706 ; Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152 , 309 P.2d 779 , 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law, Section 130.
Cited 0 timesPublished85 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922
Cases upon this question are reviewed in the case of Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., 69 Oklahoma 170 Pac. 899 , and Estus, County Clerk, v. State, 83 Okla. 181 , 200 Pac. 1002 ; Clark, State Highway Com’r, v. Warner, Co. … over the board in allowing claims.
Cited 2 timesPublished151 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1931
The assessment is not void because of the manner in which the property was listed. *228 In the case of Pentecost v. … Treas., v. Sawyer, 63 Okla. 155 , 163 P. 717 , this court said: “Under chapter 152, Sess.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 1949
OPINION — AG — ** STATE BUILDING — STATE BOARD OF REGENTS — UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS ** AS THE TIME OF SENATE BILL NO. 99 THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, AS CONTRACTING AGENT, HAD SEVERAL BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THE … (REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, CONSTRUCTION, LEGISLATION) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 74 O.S. 63 [ 74-63 ], 70 O.S. 1916 [70-1916] 70 O.S. 1916 .8 [70-1916.8], OPINION NO. JUNE 6, 1949 — DOYLE (FRED HANSEN)
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1980
Your question contemplates the powers granted to the Board of Electrology and specifically inquires as to the Board's power to regulate and restrict the location of an electrologist's practice. … The Board of Electrology as an administrative board of the State, may exercise those powers which have been expressly or impliedly conferred upon it by statute. See W. S. Pickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Inv.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1972
See Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Okl., 349 P.2d 646 (1960); Sebring v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Okl., 401 P.2d 479 (1963). … In County Election Board of Coal County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Richards
111 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925
The first, second, third, and fourth propositions here presented are similar to corresponding propositions presented in National Surety Company v. … for the use and benefit of the board of county commissioners.
Cited 18 timesPublished
Ask Donna