Case law

Fleet Bank of Maine v. Prawer

789 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 3, 1992

Defendants have not provided any record of the minutes of MSB’s board or loan committee in this regard. 8 . … See Langley v.

Ward v. Merrill

154 Me. 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 14, 1958

Fitts v. Marquis, 127 Me. 75, 79 ; 140 A. 909 . … McCaffrey et al v. Silk, Jr., 150 Me. 58, 61 ; 104 A. 2d. 436. As was said in Stearns v.

Rogers v. Town of W. Bath

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 10, 2004

LEXIS 1474, at *10 (stating that because the zoning board of appeals was not authorized by ~~~ statute, the board could not decide issues of collateral estoppel); Fields v. … V(B)(3); see also Salisbury v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2002 ME 13, 18, 788 A.2d 598, 601; Oeste v.

Belfast & Moosehead Lake R. R. v. Inhabitants of Brooks

60 Me. 568 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

Grover v. Pembroke, 11 Allen, 89 ; School District v. Blakeslee, 13 Conn. 234 . … Whether or not the requisite amount had been subscribed by responsible parties must necessarily be decided by the-board of directors, for there was no other person or persons, or tribunal, by whom the question could be determined

State v. Gulick

759 A.2d 1085 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 2000

See State v. … Delaware v.

State v. Conlogue

474 A.2d 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1984

E.g., Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093 (D.C.1979); Fortson v. State, 269 Ind. 161 , 379 N.E.2d 147 (1978); State v. Hamlette, 302 N.C. 490 , 276 S.E.2d 338 (1981); State v. … State v. Mitchell 390 A.2d 495, 501 (Me.1978); see also State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 542 (Me.1980).

O'Donnell v. Maine State Bd. of Nursing

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 20, 2004

AP-04-39, DEM- KEN - \>] a jRnoor PETER O/DONNELL, Petitioner v. DECISION AND ORDER MAINE STATE BOARD OF vi Ly NURSING, Respondent tS OP ge Once again Mr. O’Donnell is before the court on a M.R. Civ. … It is clear that licensing boards do not have jurisdiction over individuals who do not hold a license pursuant to that board. Golz v. Maine Real Estate Commission, 634 A.2d 1288 (Me. 1993).

Marquis Products, Inc. v. Conquest Carpet Mills, Inc. (In Re Marquis Products, Inc.)

150 B.R. 487 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Feb 10, 1993

Marquis’ board authorized a Chapter 11 filing on June 14, and Marquis filed its petition on June 18, 1991. 4 *489 2. The Inter-Company Relationship. … Hickman v.

Keates v. Town of Freeport

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2022

Stucki v. Flavin, 291 A.2d 508,510 (Me. 1972). Petitioner argues that the Law Court's ruling in Wake/in v. … Chamber ofCommerce v.

State v. Wentworth

65 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 1875

Com. v. Nichols, 10 Metc., 259 . State v. Brown, 31 Maine, 520. Com. v. Morgan, 107 Mass., 199 . II. … In Ward v.

Stuart v. Chapman

104 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1908

Harrington v. Harrington, 53 Vt. 649 . … Dempsey v. Chambers, 154 Mass. 330 .

Sciaraffa v. Oxford Paper Company

310 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 25, 1992

; that the Union processed each grievance through the first step of the contract grievance procedure; that the grievance was denied *902 by the company at the first step; that the Union Grievance Committee and Executive Board … of any other member, officer, local union or agent of this International Union shall have the right of appeal ; first, to his local union; second, to the International President and third to the International Executive Board

Assessors, Town of Bristol v. Eldridge

392 A.2d 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 11, 1978

Dillon v. Johnson, Me., 322 A.2d 332 (1974); Young v. … Trustees of Thayer Academy v. Board of Assessors of Braintree and Trustees of Thayer Academy v. Inhabitants of Town of Braintree (two cases), 232 Mass. 402 , 122 N.E. 410 , 411 (1919); Welch et al. v.

Kramer v. Town of Kittery

Superior Court of Maine · May 7, 2008

After the variance was issued, Nextel and Light Tower filed for site plan approval with the Town of Kittery Planning Board (Planning Board). … Standard of Review The Court reviews a local board's decision for error of law, abuse of discretion, or findings not supported by substantial evidence in the record. York v.

Beliveau v. Beliveau

655 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1987

See Gonzalez Canevero v. Rexach, 793 F.2d 417 (1st Cir.1986); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 508 F.2d 348 (1st Cir.1974); Bates v. Bushey, 407 F.Supp. 163 (D.Me. 1976). … The Plaintiffs argue that in Wood v.

Cotton v. Smithwick

66 Me. 360 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1877

Miller v. Travers, 8 Bing. 244. Hiscocks v. Hiscocks, 5 M. & W., 363. Brown v. Saltonstall, 3 Met. 423 . Tucker v. Seaman’s Aid Society, 7 Met. 188 . Howard v. The American Peace Society, 49 Maine, 288. Madden v. … In discussing this question in Miller v.

United States v. Smith

920 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 25, 1996

See United States v. Brown, 72 F.3d 96, 97 (8th Cir.1995); United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir.1995); United States v. Leshuk, 65 F.3d 1105, 1112 (4th Cir.1995); United States v. … Hodel v.

Unity Church of Greater Portland v. Bd. Of Zoning Appeals of the town of Falmouth, Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 12, 2000

The basis for the decisions of the CEO and the Board appear on the record. See R. at 10, 65-66, 67; Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1026-27 (Me. 1982). … See Twigg v.Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1995); Sibley v. Inhabitants of the Town of Wells, 462 A.2d 27, 31 (Me. 1983); Cushing v. Smith, 457 A.2d 816, 823-24 (Me. 1983).

LSP Transmission Holdings, LLC v. Lange

329 F. Supp. 3d 695 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 21, 2017

Co-op Corp. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. … A, Statement of Senator Brown at 00:28 & 49:21.) The Court takes judicial notice of these comments. The Court considers the Notice of Intent because it is embraced by the Complaint.

Inhabitants of South Berwick v. Huntress

53 Me. 89 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1865

To the same point is the case of Brown v. Pinkham, 18 Pick., 172 . … Warring v. Williams, 8 Pick., 322 ; and Warring v. Williams, 8 Pick., 325 ; Hudson v. Revett, 5 Bingham, 368, (15 E. C. L., 467.)