Case law

State of Tennessee v. Jamie Lee McKinney

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 13, 2010

Thus, “[t]he only procedure for a prisoner to obtain judicial review of an action or decision of the Board is by a petition for common-law writ of certiorari.” Hickman v. Tenn. … See State v.

Ferguson v. Tyler

134 Tenn. 25 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

In Nashville v. … In Knoxville v. Lewis, 12 Lea (80 Tenn.), 180, referring to the specific ruling in Nashville v.

In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163

Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2019

Bar Ass’n v. … In United States v.

Papachristou v. University of Tennessee

29 S.W.3d 487 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 29, 2000

Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. -5- 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. … Bryant v. Tennessee State Board of Accountancy, No. 01A01-9303-CH-00088, Davidson County (Tenn. Ct. App. filed September 1, 1993 at Nashville) (citing Metropolitan Gov’t. of Nashville v.

State v. Brooks

224 Tenn. 712 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1970

We think this was error, and hold, on authority of Hite v. State, supra; Young et al. v. State, 185 Tenn. 596 , 206 S.W.2d 805 (1947); Brown v. State, 186 Tenn. 378 , 210 S.W.2d 670 (1948); and Wilson v. … In Brown v. State, supra, 186 Tenn. at page 389 , 210 S.W.2d 670 , 27 Am.Jur., is approvingly quoted as saying- that a variance is immaterial “if the allegation was surplusage”.

In re Estate of John J. Burnette

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 16, 2016

Similarly, in Brown v. Daly, 884 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994), we held that a local rule regarding a demand for a jury trial conflicted with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 38.02. … Brown, 884 S.W.2d at 123-24; accord First Citizens Bank of Cleveland v. Cross, No. 03A01-9806-CH-00203, 1999 WL 76079, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Fitzpatrick v. Morgan Southern, Inc.

261 F. Supp. 2d 978 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 21, 2003

Drivers Assoc., Inc. v. … Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.

Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Evans

8 Tenn. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 1928

It is the insistence of the defendant that where usury appears upon the face of the note sued on, usury need not be pleaded' (citing Richardson v. Brown, 68 Tenn., 242 ; Bang v. Windmill Co., 96 Tenn., 365 ). … But this holding- has been expressly disapproved in Richardson v. Brown, 9 Baxter, 242 -249, as not in harmony with our laws defining usury.”

Hill v. Moore

510 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 25, 1981

S. v. … See, Williams v. Brown, 609 F.2d 216, 218 (5th Cir. 1980). Petitioner’s assertion that Stone v. Powell was wrongly decided in no way alters this Court’s views on its applicability to this case.

Hall v. TN Bd. of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 1999

Ellison v. Alley, 902 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. App. 1995). … Therefore, Appellant had no right to appointment of counsel in Parole Board matters. Flowers v. Traughber, Tenn. App. No. 01A01-9609-CH-00392, filed March 27, 1997, perm. app. denied July 14, 1997.

Duignan, Duwan v. Stowers Machinery Corporation

2018 TN WC 81 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 13, 2018

Johnson Carrier. ) REMAND COMPENSATION ORDER This matter came before the Court upon remand from the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. … He ' Duignan v. Stowers Mach. Corp., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 196 (Dec. 12, 2017). * Duignan v. Stowers Mach. Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Yeoman, Damien v. Transwood Logistics, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 56 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 13, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Damien Yeoman Docket No. 2024-30-2931 v. … See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015).

Erwin, Joe v. BT REDI MIX, INC.

2020 TN WC 118 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 17, 2020

To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey Scott

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 20, 2009

V; Tenn. Const. art. I, § 9. In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 471-75, 86 S. … Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 51, 107 S. Ct. 989, 998 (1987); State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d 427, 431 (Tenn. 2000).

Syph, Deborah v. Choice Food Group, Inc.

2016 TN WC 10 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 13, 2016

Smith v. The Newman Grp., LLC, No. 2015-08-0075, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 21, 2015.) … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review

Willis v. Franklin Co. Bd. of Education

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 15, 1998

The term is not ambiguous, see Anderson v. … This section does not prevent the superintendent or the school board from determining a laid off teacher’s competency, compatibility, and suitability for a particular position. See Randall v.

Grigsby v. the People's Bank

158 Tenn. 182 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1928

lawful requirements of the board of commissioners. … In Williams v.

Waste Connections of Tennessee, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 27, 2013

appeals, the legislative body becomes an administrative board for purposes of the administrative determinations it reserved.1 McCallen v. … Harvey v. Rhea County Beer Board, 563 S.W.2d 790 (Tenn. 1978); Ewin v. Richardson, 399 S.W.2d 318 (Tenn. 1966). Id. at 665-66.

State of Tennessee v. Wilson J.B. Jones

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2017

Brown, 479 S.W. 3d 200, 202 (Tenn. 2015), “held that Rule 36.1 does not authorize the correction of expired illegal sentences.” … State v. Pendergrass, 13 S.W.3d 389, 397 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999); State v. Jacqueline Crank, No. E2012-01189- CCA-R3-CD, 2013 WL 5371627, at *6 (Tenn. Crim. App.

State v. Wright

57 Tenn. 237 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

People v. … Brown v. O’Brien, 2 Indiana, 423; State v. Jones, 19 Indiana, 356. And so in Illinois they are not clothed with any discretionary power. They are not allowed to reject any returns. 29 Illinois, 422; 15 Illinois, 500.